Samsung Galaxy M55 vs Nothing CMF Phone 1 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 28, 2024 July 9, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 97.8 cm³ 103.55 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.72 "/g 3.39 "/g
Weight 180 g 197 g
Height 163.9 mm 164 mm
Width 76.5 mm 77 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Light Green
  • Dark Blue
  • Black
  • Orange
  • Light Green

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.4 % 85.1 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 2000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.13 mAh/cm³ 48.29 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 644 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M55Nothing CMF Phone 1Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.9 x 76.5 x 7.8164 x 77 x 8.2CMF Phone 1 is slightly larger and thicker. M55 might feel more comfortable for one-handed use.
Weight (g)180197M55 is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without this information.
Display
Display TypeSuper AMOLED+, 120HzAMOLED, 120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations thanks to 120Hz. Super AMOLED+ generally offers slightly better color accuracy and power efficiency.
Size (inches)6.76.67Negligible size difference.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2400Identical resolution, resulting in similar sharpness.
Peak Brightness (nits)1000 (HBM)2000CMF Phone 1 offers significantly higher peak brightness, ensuring better visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm)Dimensity 7300 (4nm)Both are mid-range chipsets built on a 4nm process, offering comparable performance. Specific benchmarks are needed for a definitive comparison.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.4 GHz A710 & 3x2.36 GHz A710 & 4x1.8 GHz A510)Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz A78 & 4x2.0 GHz A55)Different core configurations. Performance differences would depend on specific tasks and optimization.
GPUAdreno 644Mali-G615 MC2Different GPUs. Gaming performance may vary; further benchmarks are needed for accurate comparison.
RAM8GB8GBSame RAM capacity, meaning similar multitasking capabilities.
Storage256GB128GB/256GBCMF Phone 1 offers more storage configuration options.
Camera
Video Capabilities4K@30fps (OIS, EIS), 1080p@30/60fps (OIS, EIS)4K@30fps (EIS), 1080p@30/60fps (EIS)M55 has Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) at 4K and 1080p, potentially resulting in smoother videos, especially in low light, compared to CMF Phone 1's Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS).
Other Camera SpecsNot specified for either phoneNot specified for either phoneInsufficient information to compare camera quality and features.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity. Actual battery life depends on usage and optimization.
Charging SpeedNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare charging speeds without this crucial information.
Other
OSAndroid 14Android 14Both run on the latest Android version.
NFCTrueFalseM55 supports NFC for contactless payments and other functionalities, while CMF Phone 1 does not.
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-CM55 supports On-The-Go (OTG) for connecting peripherals, while CMF Phone 1's USB version is unspecified.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy M55 Advantages:

  • Lighter and potentially more ergonomic: Noticeably lighter weight improves handling comfort.
  • OIS for video recording: Offers smoother and more stable video footage.
  • NFC support: Enables contactless payments and data transfer.

Nothing CMF Phone 1 Advantages:

  • Brighter Display: Significantly brighter display for better outdoor visibility.
  • More storage options: Offers a 128GB option, potentially catering to a wider budget range.
  • Confirmed Android updates: Guaranteed updates up to Android 16.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy M55: Users who prioritize a comfortable, lightweight phone with good video stabilization and NFC functionality. Ideal for:

  • One-handed use
  • Content creation involving video recording
  • Contactless payments

Nothing CMF Phone 1: Users who prioritize a bright display and potentially need a more affordable option with ample storage. Ideal for:

  • Outdoor usage in bright sunlight
  • Media consumption
  • Users sensitive to price differences

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is outdoor visibility? CMF Phone 1's superior brightness is a significant advantage in sunny conditions.
  2. Do you frequently use contactless payments? M55's NFC functionality is essential for this.
  3. Is video recording quality a priority? M55's OIS provides a noticeable advantage in video stability.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Frequent traveler: M55 for NFC for payments and lighter weight for portability.
  • Outdoor enthusiast: CMF Phone 1 for its superior screen brightness.
  • Budget-conscious buyer: CMF Phone 1 potentially offers a lower entry price with the 128GB option.
Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.