Samsung Galaxy M55 vs Motorola Moto G35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 28, 2024 September 25, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 97.8 cm³ 98.58 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.72 "/g 3.57 "/g
Weight 180 g 188 g
Height 163.9 mm 166.3 mm
Width 76.5 mm 76 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Light Green
  • Dark Blue
  • Midnight Black
  • Sage Green
  • Leaf Green
  • Guava Red

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.72 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.4 % 86.3 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 392 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 110.72 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.13 mAh/cm³ 50.72 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) Unisoc T760 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x Cortex-A76 & 4x Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 644 Mali-G57

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M55Motorola Moto G35Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.9 x 76.5 x 7.8166.3 x 76 x 7.8The Moto G35 is slightly taller and negligibly wider. Real-world difference in handling would be minimal.
Weight (g)180188The Moto G35 is slightly heavier, but the difference (8g) is unlikely to be noticeable in daily use.
Fingerprint SensorUnder DisplaySide-mountedUnder-display sensors are generally considered more modern and premium feeling, while side-mounted sensors can be more convenient for some users.
Display
Display Size (inches)6.76.72Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Display TypeSuper AMOLED+, 120HzIPS LCD, 120HzAMOLED generally offers better contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors than IPS LCD. The M55 likely provides a superior visual experience. Both offer smooth scrolling with 120Hz refresh rate.
Peak Brightness (nits)1000 (HBM)1000Both offer similar peak brightness, ensuring good visibility in sunlight. Note: HBM (High Brightness Mode) on the M55 suggests its sustained brightness might be lower.
Resolution1080x24001080x2400Identical resolution resulting in similar sharpness.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm)Unisoc T760 (6nm)The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 is generally a more powerful and efficient chipset than the Unisoc T760. This translates to smoother performance, better gaming capabilities, and potentially longer battery life for the M55.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (1x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x Cortex-A76 & 4x Cortex-A55)Specific core configurations suggest a performance advantage for the Snapdragon chip in the M55.
GPUAdreno 644Mali-G57The Adreno 644 generally offers better graphics performance than the Mali-G57, beneficial for gaming and graphically demanding tasks.
RAM8GB8GBBoth offer the same RAM, providing sufficient memory for multitasking.
Storage256GB128GBThe M55 offers double the storage, allowing users to store more apps, photos, and videos.
Camera
Video Capabilities4K@30fps (OIS, EIS), 1080p@30/60fps (OIS, EIS)4K@30fps, 1080p@30fpsThe M55 offers optical and electronic image stabilization (OIS/EIS) at various resolutions and frame rates, likely resulting in smoother and more stable videos compared to the Moto G35, which lacks this information.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity suggests similar potential battery life, though actual usage will depend on other factors like the processor efficiency.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy M55 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED technology offers richer colors and deeper blacks.
  • Significantly Better Performance: The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 outperforms the Unisoc T760 in processing power and graphics capabilities.
  • More Storage: Double the storage capacity (256GB vs 128GB).
  • Superior Video Stabilization: OIS and EIS provide smoother and clearer videos.

Motorola Moto G35 Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: While both are in the "medium price" range, specific pricing isn't provided. Motorola devices often offer competitive pricing.
  • More Color Options: Offers a wider variety of color choices.

Trade-offs:

  • M55: Potentially higher price for superior performance and display.
  • G35: Compromises on performance and display quality for potential affordability.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy M55: Suitable for users who prioritize performance, a high-quality display, ample storage, and excellent camera features, especially video recording. Ideal for mobile gaming, media consumption, and demanding tasks.

Motorola Moto G35: Suitable for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality and a large screen. Ideal for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and casual photography. Less suitable for demanding gaming or heavy multitasking.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The M55 likely commands a higher price due to its superior specifications.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? For demanding tasks and media consumption, the M55 is superior. For basic usage, the G35 might suffice.
  3. How important is display quality and performance? The M55 significantly outperforms the G35 in these areas.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Gamer: M55 for its powerful GPU and smooth display.
  • Photographer/Videographer: M55 for its superior camera features, particularly video stabilization.
  • Budget-conscious User: G35 if basic functionality is sufficient.
  • Power User: M55 for its overall performance and large storage.
Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.