ZTE Blade A75 4G vs Nothing CMF Phone 1 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date July 1, 2024 July 9, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 106.97 cm³ 103.55 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.49 "/g 3.39 "/g
Weight 189 g 197 g
Height 164.1 mm 164 mm
Width 75.8 mm 77 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White
  • Black
  • Orange
  • Light Green

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.67 "
Resolution 720 x 1612 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.1 % 85.1 %
Pixel Density 267 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 2000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.74 mAh/cm³ 48.29 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Unisoc T606 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

ZTE Blade A75 4G vs. Nothing CMF Phone 1: A Practical Comparison

The budget smartphone market is heating up, with the ZTE Blade A75 4G and the Nothing CMF Phone 1 vying for your attention. While both aim to deliver value, their approaches differ significantly. Let's dissect their specifications and uncover which phone best suits your needs.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureZTE Blade A75 4GNothing CMF Phone 1Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6 mm164 x 77 x 8.2 mmCMF Phone 1 is slightly wider but thinner. Negligible difference in hand feel for most users.
Weight189g197gA75 is slightly lighter, but the difference is minimal.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild quality and durability remain unknown without further information.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCD, 90HzAMOLED, 120HzCMF boasts a superior AMOLED display with richer colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling due to the higher refresh rate.
Resolution720 x 16121080 x 2400CMF offers significantly sharper visuals due to the higher resolution (Full HD+ vs. HD+).
Peak BrightnessNot specified2000 nitsCMF's display will be far more visible in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T606 (12nm)Dimensity 7300 (4nm)CMF's 4nm Dimensity chip promises significantly better performance, efficiency, and thermal management compared to the A75's 12nm Unisoc processor.
CPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)CMF has faster and more powerful CPU cores, translating to smoother multitasking and app loading.
GPUMali-G57 MP1Mali-G615 MC2CMF's GPU offers better gaming performance and graphics rendering.
RAM4GB8GBCMF's double the RAM enables smoother multitasking and reduces app reloading.
Storage256GB128GB/256GBA75 offers a single high-storage variant, while CMF provides options for different storage needs.
OSAndroid 13Android 14CMF comes with the latest Android version, offering potential feature and security advantages. Longer OS support expected.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacities suggest comparable battery life, though real-world usage will depend on software optimization and individual use patterns.
Other
NFCYesNoA75 supports contactless payments and data transfer via NFC.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fpsCMF offers higher resolution video recording.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Nothing CMF Phone 1 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G due to its superior processor, GPU, and double the RAM. This translates to a smoother, more responsive user experience, especially for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Display: CMF's AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate provides a vastly improved visual experience compared to the A75's 90Hz IPS LCD. Expect vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling on the CMF.
  • Software: The CMF Phone 1 ships with Android 14, promising newer features and longer software support compared to the A75's Android 13.
  • Price-to-Performance: While the CMF Phone 1 is positioned in a higher price bracket, its superior specifications and features likely justify the increased cost for users who prioritize performance and display quality. The A75 aims for affordability.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • ZTE Blade A75 4G: Best suited for budget-conscious users who primarily use their phones for basic tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and social media. Its large storage is a plus for media consumption.
  • Nothing CMF Phone 1: Ideal for users who value performance, a high-quality display, and a modern software experience. Gamers, content creators, and power users will appreciate the CMF's capabilities.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? If price is your primary concern, the A75 is the more affordable option.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? If you need a phone for demanding tasks or gaming, the CMF's superior performance is essential. For basic usage, the A75 is sufficient.
  3. How important is display quality? If you value a vibrant and smooth display, the CMF's AMOLED screen is a significant advantage.

By carefully considering these questions and the insights provided, you can make an informed decision about which phone best aligns with your individual needs and priorities.

Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.