Xiaomi Redmi A2+ vs Samsung Galaxy M55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 March 28, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 115.25 cm³ 97.8 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.4 "/g 3.72 "/g
Weight 192 g 180 g
Height 164.9 mm 163.9 mm
Width 76.8 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Aqua Blue
  • Classic Black
  • Sea Green
  • Light Green
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.52 " 6.7 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81 % 86.4 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.62 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.39 mAh/cm³ 51.13 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Adreno 644

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi A2+Samsung Galaxy M55Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.9 x 76.8 x 9.1163.9 x 76.5 x 7.8M55 slightly smaller and thinner
Weight (g)192180M55 noticeably lighter
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild quality comparison not possible
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDSuper AMOLEDM55 offers significantly better contrast, colors, and viewing angles
Size (inches)6.526.7M55 has a slightly larger screen
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2400M55 boasts much sharper visuals
Refresh RateNot specified120HzM55 provides smoother scrolling and animations
Brightness400 nits (typ)1000 nits (HBM)M55 significantly brighter, enhancing outdoor visibility
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G36 (12 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)M55 significantly faster and more power-efficient
CPUOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)M55 offers vastly superior CPU performance for demanding tasks and multitasking
GPUPowerVR GE8320Adreno 644M55 provides a substantially better gaming and graphics experience
RAM2GB/3GB8GBM55 allows for seamless multitasking and app switching
Storage32GB/64GB256GBM55 offers much more storage space for apps, media, and files
Camera
Rear Camera8MP + 0.3MP50MP + 8MP + 2MPM55 provides significantly higher resolution and versatility with ultrawide and macro lenses
Front Camera5MP50MPM55 allows for much higher resolution selfies
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fpsM55 offers superior video recording capabilities
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacity
Fast Charging10W45WM55 charges significantly faster

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi A2+ Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Significantly more affordable.

Samsung Galaxy M55 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly faster processor, more RAM, and better GPU for smoother operation, multitasking, and gaming.
  • Better Display: Higher resolution, AMOLED technology, higher refresh rate, and brightness for a vastly improved visual experience.
  • Enhanced Camera System: Higher resolution sensors, versatile lens options (ultrawide, macro), and better video recording capabilities.
  • Faster Charging: 45W fast charging significantly reduces charging time compared to 10W.
  • More Storage: Offers significantly more storage space for apps and files.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and other NFC functionalities.
  • More up-to-date OS: Ships with Android 14, offering newer features and potentially longer software support.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi A2+: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication and light internet browsing. Ideal for:

  • Basic phone users: Calling, texting, and occasional social media use.
  • Students: Limited budget and basic smartphone needs.
  • Elderly users: Simple interface and essential functionalities.

Samsung Galaxy M55: Users who value performance, display quality, camera capabilities, and faster charging. Ideal for:

  • Power users: Demanding tasks, multitasking, and gaming.
  • Photography enthusiasts: Capturing high-quality photos and videos.
  • Content consumers: Enjoying media on a vibrant display.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi A2+ is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Basic tasks vs. demanding applications.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Performance, display, camera, or battery life.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy M55

While the Redmi A2+ offers an extremely budget-friendly option, the Samsung Galaxy M55 provides significantly better value in the long run. The superior performance, display, camera, and faster charging dramatically enhance the overall user experience. The higher initial cost is justified by the long-term benefits of a smoother, more enjoyable, and feature-rich smartphone experience. Even though specific build materials aren't listed for either phone, Samsung generally has better quality control than Xiaomi, leading to a potentially more durable device. The M55's up-to-date OS also promises longer software updates and better security in the long run. For a moderate increase in price, the M55 provides a substantial leap in functionality and quality.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.