Xiaomi Poco X5 vs Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 7, 2023 September 4, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 101.13 cm³ 118.89 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.11 "/g
Weight 189 g 257 g
Height 165.9 mm 155.2 mm
Width 76.2 mm 150.2 mm
Thickness 8 mm 5.1 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Jaguar Black
  • Wildcat Blue
  • Supernova Green
  • Obsidian
  • Porcelain

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 8 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 2076 x 2152
Aspect Ratio 20:9 16:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85 % 88.5 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 373 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 700 nits 1600 nits
Peak Brightness 1200 nits 2700 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 72.66 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.44 mAh/cm³ 39.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4650 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) Google Tensor G4 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G715 MC7

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.2

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 21

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco X5Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)165.9 x 76.2 x 8155.2 x 150.2 x 5.1Pixel 9 Pro Fold is significantly wider but thinner due to its foldable design. Poco X5 is lighter and easier to pocket.
Weight (g)189257Poco X5 is noticeably lighter for one-handed use.
FoldableNoYesPixel offers a larger screen in a potentially more pocketable size when folded.
Display
Size (inches)6.678 (unfolded)Pixel offers significantly more screen real estate when unfolded.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24002076 x 2152Pixel has a sharper display with higher resolution, especially noticeable when unfolded.
TypeSuper AMOLEDFoldable LTPO OLEDPixel's LTPO technology potentially allows for more power-efficient variable refresh rate, but we lack color depth info for both.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)12002700Pixel's significantly higher peak brightness ensures better visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)Google Tensor G4 (4 nm)Tensor G4 is a more powerful and efficient chip, leading to better performance and potentially longer battery life.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660)Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520)Pixel's CPU configuration suggests significantly better performance, especially in demanding tasks.
GPUAdreno 619Mali-G715 MC7Pixel's GPU should offer superior gaming and graphics performance.
RAM (GB)616Pixel's substantially larger RAM allows for smoother multitasking and handling more demanding applications.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)4848Resolution is similar, but sensor details are lacking for comprehensive comparison. Pixel's DxOMark score suggests superior overall camera quality.
Video Capabilities1080p@30fpsUp to 4K@60fps with HDR, OIS, EISPixel offers significantly better video recording capabilities with higher resolution, frame rates, and stabilization.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50004650Poco X5 has slightly larger battery capacity, but real-world battery life depends on various factors including chipset efficiency and software optimization.
Fast Charging (W)3327Poco X5 charges faster with wired charging. Pixel offers wireless charging (7.5W).

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco X5 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Significantly more affordable.
  • Lighter and More Pocketable: Easier for one-handed use and carrying.
  • Faster Wired Charging: Reduces downtime.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Advantages:

  • Foldable Design: Offers a larger display in a compact form factor.
  • Significantly More Powerful: Superior performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Better Camera System: Higher quality photos and significantly better video recording.
  • More Premium Display: Higher resolution, brightness, and potentially better power efficiency.
  • Longer Software Support: Expected to receive more OS updates and security patches.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco X5: Budget-conscious users who prioritize affordability, lightweight design, and fast charging. Ideal for everyday tasks like social media, web browsing, and casual gaming.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold: Users who value cutting-edge technology, a large and high-quality display, top-tier performance, and excellent camera capabilities. Ideal for power users, content creators, and those who want the latest innovations.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Pixel is significantly more expensive.
  2. Do you prioritize portability or screen size? The Poco X5 is lighter and easier to pocket, while the Pixel offers a larger unfolded screen.
  3. What are your performance and camera needs? The Pixel significantly outperforms the Poco X5 in these areas.

My Choice: Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

While the Xiaomi Poco X5 offers excellent value for its price, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is the phone I would choose. The foldable form factor, combined with the superior performance, camera system, and display, makes it a compelling device. The higher price is justified by the significant advancements in technology and user experience it offers. While I appreciate the Poco X5's lighter weight, the Pixel's larger screen and overall capabilities are more important to me personally. The longer software support also ensures a longer lifespan for the device, making it a better long-term investment.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.