Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro vs Motorola Moto G35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 12, 2024 September 25, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 96.66 cm³ 98.58 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.73 "/g 3.57 "/g
Weight 179 g 188 g
Height 161.1 mm 166.3 mm
Width 75 mm 76 mm
Thickness 8 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Purple
  • Midnight Black
  • Sage Green
  • Leaf Green
  • Guava Red

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.72 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.9 % 86.3 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 392 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1300 nits 1000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 110.72 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.73 mAh/cm³ 50.72 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra Unisoc T760 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x Cortex-A76 & 4x Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G57

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco M6 ProMotorola Moto G35Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions161.1 x 75 x 8 mm166.3 x 76 x 7.8 mmMoto G35 is slightly larger and thicker. Poco M6 Pro might feel more compact in hand.
Weight179g188gPoco M6 Pro is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Fingerprint SensorUnder displaySide-mountedPreference-based, but under-display is generally considered more modern. Side-mounted can be easier to reach for some.
Display
Display TypeAMOLED, 120HzIPS LCD, 120HzAMOLED offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and better power efficiency in dark mode compared to IPS LCD.
Peak Brightness1300 nits1000 nitsPoco M6 Pro's higher peak brightness ensures better visibility in direct sunlight.
Size6.67 inches6.72 inchesNegligible difference in screen size.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2400Identical resolution, resulting in similar sharpness.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations thanks to the high refresh rate.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G99 UltraUnisoc T760 (6 nm)Difficult to compare directly without benchmarks. Unisoc T760 being 6nm might offer better power efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x Cortex-A76 & 4x Cortex-A55)Moto G35's CPU configuration suggests potentially better multi-core performance, but real-world difference needs benchmarking.
GPUMali-G57 MC2Mali-G57Moto G35's GPU might offer slightly better graphical performance, although practical difference might be minimal. Missing core count for Moto G35 makes direct comparison difficult.
RAM/Storage12GB/512GB8GB/128GBPoco M6 Pro offers significantly more RAM and storage, enabling smoother multitasking and ample space for apps and files.
Camera
Video Capabilities1080p@30/60fps (EIS)4K@30fps, 1080p@30fpsMoto G35 can record in 4K resolution. Detailed camera sensor specifications are missing to fully compare image quality.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhIdentical battery capacity suggests similar battery life, although real-world usage will depend on other factors like the display and chipset.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro Advantages:

  • Brighter Display: Better outdoor visibility.
  • Larger Storage: More space for apps, photos, and videos.
  • More RAM: Smoother multitasking and better performance with demanding applications.
  • Potentially Lighter and More Compact: Improved one-handed usability.

Motorola Moto G35 Advantages:

  • 4K Video Recording: Higher resolution video capture.
  • Potentially More Powerful CPU/GPU: Could lead to better performance in demanding tasks and gaming (needs benchmarks to confirm).
  • More Recent Android Version: Access to newer features and potentially longer software support.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro: Users who prioritize a bright, vibrant display, ample storage, smooth multitasking, and a compact form factor. Ideal for media consumption, gaming, and general productivity.

Motorola Moto G35: Users who prioritize 4K video recording and potentially slightly better performance in demanding tasks. Suitable for casual gaming, content creation involving video, and general use.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Is storage and RAM a priority? If yes, the Poco M6 Pro is the clear winner.
  2. Is 4K video recording essential? If yes, the Moto G35 is the better choice.
  3. Which display technology is preferred? AMOLED offers better colors and contrast, while IPS LCD is often considered more color-accurate (subjective).

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro

While the Motorola Moto G35 offers 4K video recording and potentially a slightly more powerful chipset, the Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro is my choice due to its superior combination of features. The brighter AMOLED display, significantly larger RAM and storage, and more compact design are compelling advantages for everyday use. The lack of specific core count for the Moto G35's GPU makes it difficult to judge the actual performance difference. The massive 512GB storage on the Poco M6 Pro provides long-term value, especially for users who store a lot of media. The brighter display enhances outdoor usability. While 4K recording is a nice feature, 1080p at 60fps with EIS on the Poco M6 Pro offers a good balance of quality and practicality for everyday video recording. Ultimately, the Poco M6 Pro provides a more well-rounded package for the majority of users.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.