Xiaomi Poco F4 vs Oppo Reno8 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 27, 2022 July 19, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 95.5 cm³ 87.32 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 195 g 183 g
Height 163.2 mm 161.2 mm
Width 76 mm 74.2 mm
Thickness 7.7 mm 7.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Night Black
  • Moonlight Silver
  • Nebula Green
  • Glazed Green
  • Glazed Black
  • House of the Dragon

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.6 % 90.3 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness 900 nits 800 nits
Peak Brightness 1300 nits 950 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 101.15 mAh/in² 100.25 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.12 mAh/cm³ 51.54 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 650 Mali-G610 MC6

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version 13 14

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco F4 vs. Oppo Reno8 Pro: A Comparative Analysis

Let's dive deep into a head-to-head comparison of the Xiaomi Poco F4 and the Oppo Reno8 Pro, dissecting their specifications and uncovering what they truly offer in real-world usage.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco F4Oppo Reno8 ProReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.2 x 76 x 7.7161.2 x 74.2 x 7.3Reno8 Pro is slightly more compact and thinner.
Weight (g)195183Reno8 Pro feels noticeably lighter in hand.
Fingerprint SensorSide-mountedUnder-displayPersonal preference; under-display feels more modern, side-mounted can be faster.
Display
Size (inches)6.676.7Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2412Virtually identical sharpness; both offer crisp visuals.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Smooth scrolling and animations on both.
Panel TypeAMOLEDAMOLEDVibrant colors, deep blacks, and excellent contrast on both.
Peak Brightness1300 nits950 nitsPoco F4 can get significantly brighter outdoors.Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 870Dimensity 8100 MaxBoth offer excellent performance, but benchmarks suggest the Dimensity 8100 Max might have a slight edge in sustained performance and efficiency.
CPUOcta-coreOcta-coreBoth handle multitasking and demanding apps with ease. Real-world difference will be minimal for most users.
GPUAdreno 650Mali-G610 MC6Gaming performance should be comparable, with potential minor advantages for either depending on the specific game.
RAM6/8/12GB8/12GBSufficient RAM for smooth multitasking on both, though the Poco F4 offers a 6GB option for budget-conscious users.
Camera
Main Sensor (MP)6450Oppo's IMX766 sensor generally produces better low-light images and dynamic range.
Selfie Camera (MP)2032Reno8 Pro boasts a higher resolution selfie camera.
Video4K@60fps4K@30fpsPoco F4 offers higher resolution video recording.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)45004500Similar battery capacities suggest comparable longevity.
Fast Charging (W)6780Reno8 Pro charges significantly faster.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: Both phones deliver flagship-level performance for everyday tasks and demanding applications. The Dimensity 8100 Max in the Reno8 Pro may offer better sustained performance and efficiency due to its 5nm fabrication process compared to the 7nm Snapdragon 870 in the Poco F4.
  • Camera: The Oppo Reno8 Pro generally captures superior images, particularly in challenging lighting conditions, thanks to its Sony IMX766 sensor. The Poco F4, however, offers 4K@60fps video recording, providing smoother and more detailed videos.
  • Display: Both feature excellent AMOLED displays with 120Hz refresh rates. However, the Poco F4 boasts a higher peak brightness, making it more legible in direct sunlight.
  • Charging: The Reno8 Pro's 80W fast charging significantly outpaces the Poco F4's 67W, minimizing downtime.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Poco F4: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize performance, a bright display, and high-resolution video recording. Ideal for mobile gamers and content creators who don't need the absolute best camera quality.
  • Oppo Reno8 Pro: A better choice for users who value camera quality, faster charging, and a sleek design. Well-suited for photography enthusiasts and those who prefer a premium feel.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What is your budget? The Poco F4 generally offers better value for money due to its lower price point.
  • Is camera quality your top priority? If so, the Oppo Reno8 Pro is the clear winner.
  • How important is fast charging? The Reno8 Pro's 80W charging will significantly reduce waiting time compared to the Poco F4.

My Choice: The Oppo Reno8 Pro

While the Poco F4 offers incredible value, I would choose the Oppo Reno8 Pro. The superior camera, especially in low light, is a major deciding factor for me. I also appreciate the faster charging and the slightly more refined design. Although the price premium exists, the enhanced camera capabilities and quicker charging align better with my personal needs and priorities. The marginal performance differences between the two chipsets are less significant to me than the tangible benefits of a better camera and faster charging in daily use.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.