Xiaomi Poco F4 GT vs Samsung Galaxy M55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 28, 2022 March 28, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 105.94 cm³ 97.8 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.18 "/g 3.72 "/g
Weight 210 g 180 g
Height 162.5 mm 163.9 mm
Width 76.7 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Stealth Black
  • Knight Silver
  • Cyber Yellow
  • Light Green
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.2 % 86.4 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 105.64 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.36 mAh/cm³ 51.13 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4700 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 730 Adreno 644

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a user-centered comparison of the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT and the Samsung Galaxy M55, moving beyond mere specs to understand how these devices translate into real-world experiences.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureXiaomi Poco F4 GTSamsung Galaxy M55User Experience Impact
Interface DesignGaming-centric, potentially overwhelming for some usersLikely a cleaner, more universally appealing UIImpacts visual appeal and ease of navigation.
Interaction FlowOptimized for speed and responsiveness; gamer featuresLikely smoother, more general-purpose flowAffects how quickly and intuitively users accomplish tasks.
AccessibilityLimited information availableMore research neededDetermines how usable the device is for people with diverse needs.
ErgonomicsHeavier (210g), thicker (8.5mm)Lighter (180g), thinner (7.8mm)Impacts comfort during extended use, especially single-handed operation.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: A Mobile Gamer vs. An Everyday User

Imagine two users: Maria, a passionate mobile gamer, and David, a professional who primarily uses their phone for communication and productivity.

For Maria, the Poco F4 GT's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 processor and Adreno 730 GPU become her gateway to a lag-free, immersive gaming world. The 120Hz refresh rate ensures buttery smooth visuals, making fast-paced games a joy. The physical pop-up trigger buttons transform her phone into a dedicated gaming device.

David, however, might find the Poco's aggressive gaming aesthetic and features overkill. He'd appreciate the Galaxy M55's lighter weight, longer battery life (5000mAh vs 4700mAh), and potentially cleaner interface for everyday tasks like email, browsing, and social media. While the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 is less powerful, it's ample for his needs.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

Both phones offer large, vibrant AMOLED displays with 120Hz refresh rates, catering to users who value visual clarity and smooth scrolling. However, the Poco F4 GT's heavier weight might be less suitable for users with smaller hands or those who prefer a lighter device. More information is needed on accessibility features for a thorough evaluation.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Choosing the Right Phone:

  • Prioritize Performance & Gaming: Poco F4 GT
  • Prioritize Battery Life, Comfort & Ease of Use: Samsung Galaxy M55

Beyond the Specs: Consider your individual usage patterns, aesthetic preferences, and comfort levels. Don't solely rely on benchmarks, but envision how each phone fits into your daily life.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy M55

While the Poco F4 GT boasts impressive performance, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M55. As Sophia Rodriguez, my focus is on user-centered design and holistic experiences. The M55's lighter weight, longer battery life, and likely more streamlined interface align better with a broader range of user needs. Its more modern OS (Android 14) promises longer software support. Though gaming is a significant aspect of mobile usage, the everyday user experience for tasks like communication, productivity, and content consumption is paramount. The M55 likely provides a more balanced and enjoyable experience for the average user, while the Poco F4 GT caters to a niche audience of power users and mobile gamers. The significant difference in AnTuTu benchmark scores, while important for gamers, is less crucial for everyday tasks. Ultimately, the M55 appears to offer a more sustainable and accessible user experience in the long run.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.