Xiaomi 14 vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Xiaomi 14
Xiaomi 14
Xiaomi

General

Launch Date November 1, 2023 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 89.59 cm³ 90.05 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.65 "/g
Weight 188 g 189 g
Height 152.8 mm 171.4 mm
Width 71.5 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 7.1 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Black
  • White
  • Pink
  • Jade Green
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Spring Green (Dill)
  • Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer)

Display

Screen Size 6.36 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1200 x 2670 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.3 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 460 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness 1000 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 3000 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 113.97 mAh/in² 84.02 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.46 mAh/cm³ 44.42 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4610 mAh 4000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 750 Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 18 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi 14Motorola Razr 50 UltraPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions152.8 x 71.5 x 8.2 mm171.4 x 74 x 7.1 mm (Unfolded)Razr 50 Ultra significantly taller and wider when unfolded, but much more compact when folded. Xiaomi 14 is thinner overall.
Weight188g189gNegligible weight difference.
FoldableNoYesRazr 50 Ultra offers portability advantage when folded; Xiaomi 14 offers a traditional smartphone form factor.
Display
Size6.36"6.9"Razr 50 Ultra offers a larger screen for media consumption.
TypeLTPO OLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLEDRazr's foldable screen introduces a crease and potential durability concerns. Xiaomi 14's traditional display may offer better visual consistency.
Resolution1200 x 26701080 x 2640Xiaomi 14 has a slightly sharper display due to higher pixel density (460ppi vs 413ppi).
Refresh Rate120Hz165HzRazr 50 Ultra offers smoother scrolling and animations. Difference may not be perceptible to all users.
Peak Brightness3000 nits3000 nitsBoth excel in outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 3Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1Xiaomi 14 boasts a significantly newer and more powerful processor, leading to better performance and efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.3 GHz...)Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz...)Xiaomi 14's CPU has higher clock speeds, translating to faster processing in demanding tasks.
GPUAdreno 750Adreno 735Xiaomi 14 has a more powerful GPU, resulting in smoother gaming and graphics performance.
RAM12GB12GBBoth offer ample RAM for multitasking.
Storage256/512GB256GBXiaomi 14 offers a 512GB storage option for users needing more space.
Battery
Capacity4610 mAh3800 mAhXiaomi 14 has a significantly larger battery, likely resulting in longer battery life.
Other
OSAndroid 14Android 14Both run the latest Android version at launch. Max OS version unknown for Xiaomi 14, 17 for Razr 50 Ultra.
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 2.0Xiaomi 14 offers faster data transfer speeds.
Sensors...color spectrum... Fingerprint (side-mounted)Xiaomi 14 includes a color spectrum sensor for potentially improved display color accuracy. Razr's side fingerprint scanner might be more accessible while folded.
Video CapabilitiesUp to 8K@24fpsUp to 4K@60fpsXiaomi 14 supports 8K video recording, offering higher resolution video.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi 14 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 provides a significant performance advantage over the Razr's 8+ Gen 1. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming.
  • Longer Battery Life: The larger battery capacity suggests significantly longer usage time.
  • Sharper Display: Higher resolution results in a slightly sharper image.
  • Faster Charging & Data Transfer: USB 3.2 offers significant advantages in charging and data transfer speeds.
  • Larger Storage Option: Availability of a 512GB model caters to users with high storage demands.

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Advantages:

  • Foldable Design: Offers unparalleled portability and a unique form factor.
  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: Provides smoother scrolling and animations, though the difference might not be noticeable to all users.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi 14: Ideal for users prioritizing performance, battery life, and a traditional smartphone experience. Excellent for power users, gamers, and those who consume a lot of media.

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra: Best suited for users who value portability and a unique, compact design above all else. Appeals to those who want a phone that easily fits in a pocket or small bag.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. Is portability your top priority? If yes, the Razr's foldable design is a compelling advantage.
  2. Do you need the best possible performance and battery life? If yes, the Xiaomi 14 is the clear winner.
  3. Are you willing to compromise on some aspects for the novelty of a foldable phone? The Razr requires accepting potential trade-offs in performance, battery life, and durability.

My Choice: Xiaomi 14

While the Razr 50 Ultra's foldable design is intriguing, the Xiaomi 14's superior performance, battery life, and overall feature set make it the more compelling device for me. I prioritize a smooth and powerful user experience, and the Xiaomi 14 delivers that with its latest-generation processor and larger battery. The faster charging and data transfer speeds offered by USB 3.2 are also significant advantages in my daily usage. The slightly sharper display is a bonus. While I appreciate the Razr's portability, I'm not willing to compromise on performance and battery life for the foldable form factor. The potential durability concerns associated with foldable screens also contribute to my decision.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.