Xiaomi 13 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy M55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 8, 2023 March 28, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 83.33 cm³ 97.8 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.83 "/g 3.72 "/g
Weight 171 g 180 g
Height 159.2 mm 163.9 mm
Width 72.7 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 7.2 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Lite Blue
  • Lite Pink
  • Light Green
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.5 % 86.4 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 1000 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.89 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 54 mAh/cm³ 51.13 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 644 Adreno 644

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi 13 LiteSamsung Galaxy M55Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)159.2 x 72.7 x 7.2163.9 x 76.5 x 7.8M55 is slightly larger and thicker. May impact one-handed usability.
Weight (g)17118013 Lite is noticeably lighter, more comfortable for extended use.
Display
Display TypeAMOLEDSuper AMOLED+Both offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. Subtle differences in power efficiency and brightness may exist, but require real-world testing to confirm. We lack specific brightness data for the M55 to make a definitive comparison.
Display Size (inches)6.556.7M55 offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive media consumption.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2400Identical resolution, sharpness will be similar. Due to the larger screen size of the M55, the 13 Lite has a higher pixel density (402 vs 393 ppi), though the difference is negligible in practical use.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
HDRDolby Vision, HDR10+No HDR Data13 Lite supports wider HDR formats for better video quality in supported content. Lack of HDR data for the M55 limits our analysis.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7 Gen 1Snapdragon 7 Gen 1Identical chipsets, performance should be comparable.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Identical CPU configurations, performance should be similar.
RAM (GB)88Equal RAM, multitasking capabilities should be comparable.
OSAndroid 12Android 14M55 ships with a newer Android version, offering potential feature and security advantages. 13 Lite may receive updates to a later version, but this is not guaranteed.
Camera
Rear Camera (MP)50MP Main, 8MP Wide, 2MP Macro50MP Main, 8MP Wide, 2MP MacroSimilar camera configurations on paper. Image quality will depend on sensor quality, processing, and software, which are not fully detailed.
Front Camera (MP)32MP + 8MP Depth50MPM55 has a higher resolution front camera. Dual front camera setup on the 13 Lite may offer better portrait mode effects.
Video StabilizationNo OISOIS & EISM55 offers optical and electronic image stabilization for smoother video recording.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)45005000M55 has a larger battery, likely resulting in longer battery life.
Fast Charging67W45W13 Lite supports significantly faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi 13 Lite Advantages:

  • Lighter and more compact: Easier to handle and carry.
  • Faster charging: Significantly reduces downtime.
  • Wider HDR support: Better video quality on compatible content.
  • Dual front camera: Potentially better portrait mode effects.

Samsung Galaxy M55 Advantages:

  • Larger battery: Potentially longer battery life.
  • Newer Android version: More up-to-date features and security.
  • Video Stabilization: Smoother video recording.
  • Larger Display: More immersive experience for media.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi 13 Lite: Users who prioritize portability, fast charging, and high-quality video playback. Suitable for:

  • Users who dislike large, heavy phones.
  • Content consumers who value HDR.
  • Users who need quick top-ups of battery.

Samsung Galaxy M55: Users who value long battery life, a large display, and the latest software. Suitable for:

  • Heavy users who need all-day battery life.
  • Users who prioritize video recording stability.
  • Users who prefer the latest software features.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is battery life versus charging speed?
  2. Do you prioritize a large screen or a compact design?
  3. How important is video recording stability?

My Choice:

I would choose the Xiaomi 13 Lite. While the Samsung Galaxy M55 boasts a larger battery and newer Android version, the 13 Lite's significantly faster charging, lighter weight, and more compact design are more compelling to me. I value portability and quick charging highly. The wider HDR support is a bonus for video streaming. The slightly older Android version is less of a concern as long as the 13 Lite receives sufficient software updates. While the M55 offers video stabilization, I personally don't record enough video for this to be a deciding factor. Ultimately, my choice reflects my personal preference for a lighter, faster-charging device. The M55 may be a better choice for users who prioritize battery life and screen size above all else.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.