Xiaomi 11T vs Samsung Galaxy M55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Xiaomi 11T
Xiaomi 11T
Xiaomi

General

Launch Date October 5, 2021 March 28, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 111.05 cm³ 97.8 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.29 "/g 3.72 "/g
Weight 203 g 180 g
Height 164.1 mm 163.9 mm
Width 76.9 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Meteorite Gray
  • Moonlight White
  • Celestial Blue
  • Light Green
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.1 % 86.4 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 800 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 1000 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.02 mAh/cm³ 51.13 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G77 MC9 Adreno 644

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a user-centered comparison of the Xiaomi 11T and the Samsung Galaxy M55, moving beyond mere specs to understand how these devices translate into real-world experiences.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureXiaomi 11TSamsung Galaxy M55User Experience Impact
Interface DesignMIUI 12.5 (Android 11)One UI Core 5 (Android 14)M55 offers a potentially more modern and refined interface due to newer Android and One UI versions.
Interaction Flow120Hz AMOLED Display120Hz Super AMOLED+ DisplayBoth offer smooth scrolling and responsiveness. The M55's "Plus" suggests potential display enhancements.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android 11 Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android 14 Accessibility FeaturesM55 likely benefits from advancements in Android's accessibility features over the two OS generations.
Design Ergonomics203g, 8.8mm thick180g, 7.8mm thickM55 is lighter and thinner, potentially offering a more comfortable one-handed experience.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a photography enthusiast, Sarah, who loves capturing vibrant cityscapes and sharing her adventures online.

  • Xiaomi 11T: Sarah appreciates the 108MP main camera for detailed shots, but finds the lack of optical image stabilization challenging when shooting on the go. The fast charging is a lifesaver for quickly topping up the battery during a busy day of exploring.

  • Samsung Galaxy M55: Sarah enjoys the M55's lighter weight and slim profile, making it easier to carry while navigating crowded streets. The 4K video recording with OIS ensures smoother, more professional-looking footage. The newer OS offers potential advantages in photo editing apps and features.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For a senior user: The M55's lighter weight and potentially simpler One UI Core interface might be more manageable. The larger text options and accessibility features in the newer Android version would also be beneficial.
  • For a budget-conscious student: The Xiaomi 11T offers compelling performance at a potentially lower price point. The robust battery life is ideal for long days on campus.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

While both phones offer strong features, the Samsung Galaxy M55 demonstrates a more user-centered design approach. The combination of a lighter, slimmer build, a newer Android OS with potentially refined UI, and advancements in camera stabilization caters to a broader range of user needs and preferences. The Xiaomi 11T offers compelling value and performance, but the M55’s design choices indicate a stronger focus on creating a holistic, enjoyable user experience.

My Choice: I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M55.

Why? As a technology communicator focused on user experience, I prioritize devices that seamlessly integrate into people's lives. The M55's thoughtful design considerations, such as its lighter weight, slimmer profile, and the newer Android OS and UI, indicate a commitment to creating a device that is not just powerful, but also enjoyable and accessible to use. While raw specifications are important, the M55's subtle design choices contribute to a more satisfying and intuitive overall experience, which aligns with my core values of user-centered communication and design thinking. The advancements in camera technology, particularly the optical image stabilization, are crucial for capturing high-quality content effortlessly, a feature that greatly enhances the user experience for both casual and passionate photographers. Finally, the updated OS ensures access to the latest features and security updates, further solidifying the M55 as the more future-proof and user-friendly option.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.