vivo Y76 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 23, 2021 March 28, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 95.82 cm³ 97.8 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.76 "/g 3.72 "/g
Weight 175 g 180 g
Height 163.8 mm 163.9 mm
Width 75 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Aurora
  • Midnight Space
  • Light Green
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.58 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 86.4 %
Pixel Density 401 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 460 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 94.70 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 42.79 mAh/cm³ 51.13 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4100 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Adreno 644

Connectivity

USB Version N/A 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

vivo Y76 5G vs. Samsung Galaxy M55: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones not just by their specs, but by how they feel in your hand and how they fit into your life. Let's dive into a narrative-driven comparison of the vivo Y76 5G and the Samsung Galaxy M55.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

Featurevivo Y76 5GSamsung Galaxy M55User Experience Impact
Interface DesignAndroid 11 (Funtouch OS)Android 14 (One UI)M55 offers a more modern and potentially feature-rich OS experience.
Interaction FlowStandard Android NavigationCustomizable One UI NavigationM55 allows for personalized navigation, potentially improving efficiency.
Accessibility FeaturesBasic Android AccessibilityEnhanced One UI AccessibilityM55 likely provides more comprehensive accessibility options for diverse user needs.
Design Ergonomics175g, 7.8mm thick180g, 7.8mm thickNegligible difference in weight and thickness; both should feel comfortable in hand.
Display6.58" IPS LCD, 401 ppi6.7" Super AMOLED, 393 ppi, 120HzM55 boasts a vibrant AMOLED display with a smoother 120Hz refresh rate for superior visual experience.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're a photography enthusiast who also relies heavily on your phone for everyday tasks.

  • vivo Y76 5G: Offers a capable triple-lens camera system for capturing everyday moments. The 44W fast charging keeps you powered up throughout the day. However, the IPS LCD might feel less vibrant compared to newer AMOLED displays. Think of it as a reliable point-and-shoot camera - it gets the job done, but lacks advanced features.

  • Samsung Galaxy M55: The 50MP main camera with OIS and 4K video recording allows you to capture stunning photos and videos with impressive detail and stability. The 120Hz Super AMOLED display brings your content to life, offering a smooth and immersive viewing experience. It's like having a versatile mirrorless camera with a high-quality viewfinder that also handles your daily communication needs effortlessly.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For users who prioritize affordability and basic functionality: The vivo Y76 5G offers a solid foundation at a potentially lower price point.
  • For users who value a premium visual experience, enhanced performance, and the latest software: The Samsung Galaxy M55 provides a more compelling overall package.
  • For users with specific accessibility needs: The more advanced accessibility features of the Samsung Galaxy M55 may be crucial.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The vivo Y76 5G presents a functional design, while the Samsung Galaxy M55 embraces a more modern and refined approach. Consider these design-driven insights:

  • Visual Appeal: The M55's AMOLED display offers richer colors and deeper blacks.
  • Performance: The M55's newer processor and higher refresh rate display provide a noticeable performance advantage.
  • Longevity: The M55's newer Android version ensures longer software support and access to the latest features.

My Choice: I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M55.

Why? While the vivo Y76 5G is a decent phone, the Samsung Galaxy M55 provides a significantly better user experience. The Super AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate is a game-changer for visual clarity and smooth interactions. The newer processor, more advanced camera system with OIS, and updated Android OS offer substantial performance and feature advantages. In the long run, the M55's superior technology and extended software support make it a more valuable investment, even considering a potential price difference. It aligns more closely with a design philosophy that prioritizes user engagement and long-term satisfaction. It's like choosing a well-crafted tool that enhances your creative potential and seamlessly integrates into your digital life.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.