Specifications Comparison
| Feature | vivo V40 | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75 x 7.6 mm | 165.1 x 71.9 x 6.9 mm | Z Flip6 is slightly narrower and thinner, but taller when unfolded. V40 is a traditional slab phone design. Z Flip6's foldable design offers portability but introduces a crease on the main display. |
| Weight | 190g | 187g | Negligible weight difference in practical use. |
| Foldable | No | Yes | Z Flip6's foldable design allows for compact storage and a unique form factor. V40 offers a more traditional smartphone experience. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.78" | 6.7" | V40 has a slightly larger display area. |
| Type | AMOLED, HDR10+, 120Hz | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+ | Both offer smooth scrolling and vibrant colors. Z Flip6's foldable display technology allows for a compact form factor when closed but may have a visible crease. |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 | 1080 x 2640 | V40 has a sharper display due to higher resolution. |
| Peak Brightness | 4500 nits | 2600 nits | V40 will be significantly more readable in direct sunlight. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Z Flip6 boasts a significantly more powerful processor, leading to smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance. |
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz A715 & 3x2.4 GHz A715 & 4x1.8 GHz A510) | Octa-core (1x3.39 GHz X4 & 3x3.1 GHz A720 & 2x2.9 GHz A720 & 2x2.2 GHz A520) | Z Flip6 has a more powerful CPU architecture, resulting in noticeable performance advantages. |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Adreno 750 (1 GHz) | Z Flip6's GPU provides a superior gaming and graphics rendering experience. |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB | Both phones offer ample RAM for smooth multitasking. |
| Storage | 512GB | 512GB | Both phones offer the same storage capacity. |
| Camera | |||
| Video Capabilities | 4K@30fps (OIS, EIS), 1080p@30fps (OIS, EIS) | 4K@30/60fps (HDR), 1080p@60/120/240/960fps (HDR) | Z Flip6 offers significantly more versatile video recording options including higher frame rates and HDR at various resolutions, enabling slow-motion capture and smoother high-quality videos. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 5500 mAh | 4000 mAh | V40 offers significantly longer battery life. Z Flip6's smaller battery is a trade-off for its foldable design. |
Key Differences Analysis
vivo V40 Advantages:
- Larger, sharper display with higher brightness
- Significantly longer battery life
- Potentially lower price (within the "medium price" range)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 Advantages:
- Significantly more powerful processor and GPU for better performance
- More versatile video recording capabilities
- Foldable design for portability and unique form factor
Trade-offs:
- V40: Less powerful processor, less versatile video recording, traditional design.
- Z Flip6: Shorter battery life, smaller display with potential crease, higher price within the "medium price" range.
User Profiles & Recommendations
vivo V40: Ideal for users prioritizing battery life, display quality, and affordability. Best for media consumption, web browsing, and everyday tasks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6: Ideal for users prioritizing performance, portability, and a unique design. Best for demanding tasks, gaming, and content creation leveraging its versatile video recording capabilities. Suitable for users who value compactness and style.
Decision Framework
- Is top-tier performance a priority? If yes, the Z Flip6's Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is the clear winner.
- How important is battery life? If all-day battery life is essential, the V40's larger battery is a significant advantage.
- Is a foldable design a must-have? The Z Flip6 offers portability and a unique form factor that a traditional slab phone like the V40 cannot match.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Heavy user, gamer: Z Flip6
- Casual user, prioritizing battery life: V40
- User seeking a compact, stylish phone: Z Flip6
- Budget-conscious user prioritizing display and battery: V40
