Samsung Galaxy S24 vs Motorola Moto G35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 24, 2024 September 25, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 78.87 cm³ 98.58 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.71 "/g 3.57 "/g
Weight 167 g 188 g
Height 147 mm 166.3 mm
Width 70.6 mm 76 mm
Thickness 7.6 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Onyx Black
  • Jade Green
  • Marble Grey
  • Cobalt Violet
  • Amber Yellow
  • Sandstone Orange
  • Sapphire Blue
  • Midnight Black
  • Sage Green
  • Leaf Green
  • Guava Red

Display

Screen Size 6.2 " 6.72 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 90.9 % 86.3 %
Pixel Density 416 PPI 392 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 2600 nits 1000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.06 mAh/in² 110.72 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.71 mAh/cm³ 50.72 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) - USA/Canada/China Unisoc T760 (6 nm)
CPU 8-core (1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520) Octa-core (1x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x Cortex-A76 & 4x Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 750 (1 GHz) - USA/Canada/China Mali-G57

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version 1.2 N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.2 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 21

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy S24Motorola Moto G35Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions147x70.6x7.6mm166.3x76x7.8mmS24 is significantly smaller and more pocketable.
Weight167g188gS24 is noticeably lighter.
Build MaterialsMissingMissingMaterial differences impact durability and premium feel; information is lacking here.
Display
Display TypeDynamic LTPO AMOLED 2XIPS LCDS24's AMOLED offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially better power efficiency due to per-pixel illumination.
Size6.2"6.72"G35 provides a larger screen for media consumption, but may be less comfortable for one-handed use.
Resolution1080x23401080x2400Similar pixel density due to differing screen sizes; sharpness should be comparable.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness2600 nits1000 nitsS24 will be far more visible in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm)Unisoc T760 (6nm)S24's flagship Snapdragon chip will deliver significantly faster performance, smoother multitasking, and better gaming capabilities.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.39GHz + ...)Octa-core (1x2.2 GHz + ...)S24's higher clock speeds and more powerful core architecture translates to a much faster and more responsive user experience.
GPUAdreno 750Mali-G57S24 will offer a substantially better gaming experience and handle graphically demanding tasks more efficiently.
RAM8GB8GBEqual RAM; multitasking performance will depend more on chipset differences.
Storage256/512GB128GBS24 offers more storage options for apps, media, and files.
Camera
Rear Camera SpecsMissingMissingCannot compare camera quality without specific sensor details and features.
Video Capabilities8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps...4K@30fps, 1080p@30fpsS24 offers superior video recording resolution and frame rate options.
Battery
Capacity4000 mAh5000 mAhG35 has a larger battery capacity, but real-world battery life depends on factors like display type and processor efficiency.
Charging SpeedMissingMissingCharging speed significantly impacts usability; information is lacking.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy S24 Advantages:

  • Significantly faster performance: The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is a flagship processor that outclasses the Unisoc T760 in every aspect.
  • Brighter and more vibrant display: The Dynamic AMOLED 2X offers superior visuals and outdoor visibility.
  • More compact and premium design: The S24 is smaller and lighter, likely with more premium materials (though specifics are missing).
  • Superior video recording capabilities: Offers higher resolution and frame rate options.

Motorola Moto G35 Advantages:

  • Larger battery: Potentially longer battery life, though this depends on other factors.
  • Larger display: More immersive for media consumption.

Trade-offs:

  • Performance vs. Battery Life: The S24 prioritizes performance, potentially at the cost of battery life compared to the G35.
  • Size and Portability: The G35's larger screen comes at the expense of one-handed usability.
  • Price: While both are in the "medium price" range, the S24 will likely be more expensive given its superior specifications.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy S24: Users who prioritize performance, a premium experience, vibrant visuals, and portability. Ideal for demanding tasks, gaming, and content creation.

Motorola Moto G35: Users who prioritize battery life, a large screen for media consumption, and affordability. Suitable for casual use, browsing, and video streaming.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The S24 will likely be more expensive.
  2. What are your primary use cases? (e.g., gaming, photography, social media)
  3. Do you prioritize performance or battery life?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy user, gamer: Samsung Galaxy S24
  • Casual user, budget-conscious: Motorola Moto G35

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy S24

While missing specifications prevent a completely informed decision, the Samsung Galaxy S24 is my clear choice based on the available data. The significant performance advantage offered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, coupled with the superior display, compact form factor, and advanced video capabilities, outweigh the potential benefits of the Moto G35's larger battery and screen. I prioritize a smooth and responsive user experience, and the S24 is clearly built to deliver that. The brighter display is crucial for outdoor use, and the superior video recording features are important for capturing memories. While battery life is a concern, advancements in chip efficiency and software optimization could mitigate the difference in battery capacity. Finally, I prefer a smaller, more pocketable phone.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.