Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra vs Motorola Edge 50 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 17, 2023 May 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 113.58 cm³ 100.31 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 2.91 "/g 3.4 "/g
Weight 234 g 197 g
Height 163.4 mm 161.1 mm
Width 78.1 mm 72.4 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Red
  • Green
  • Graphite
  • Phantom Black
  • Lavender
  • Cream
  • Sky Blue
  • Lime
  • BMW M Edition
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Forest Grey
  • Nordic Wood

Display

Screen Size 6.8 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1440 x 3088 1220 x 2712
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.5 % 92.9 %
Pixel Density 500 PPI 446 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1200 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1750 nits 2500 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.13 mAh/in² 100.25 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.02 mAh/cm³ 44.86 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 740 Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 3.1
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A 1.4
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2, OTG USB Type-C 3.1, Gen 2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy S23 UltraMotorola Edge 50 UltraPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.4 x 78.1 x 8.9161.1 x 72.4 x 8.6Motorola is slightly smaller and thinner, potentially improving one-handed usability.
Weight (g)234197The Motorola is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Size (inches)6.86.7Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution (px)1440 x 30881220 x 2712The Samsung has a sharper display (higher pixel density), resulting in crisper text and images.
TypeDynamic AMOLED 2XP-OLEDBoth offer excellent color accuracy and deep blacks; subjective preference may determine the winner.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120144The Motorola's higher refresh rate provides smoother animations and scrolling.
Peak Brightness (nits)17502500The Motorola's significantly higher peak brightness ensures better visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 2Snapdragon 8s Gen 3While both are high-end chipsets, the 8s Gen 3 in the Motorola is newer, potentially offering slightly better performance and efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (up to 3.36 GHz)Octa-core (up to 3.0 GHz)Benchmarking would be needed to determine real-world performance differences; both should handle demanding tasks with ease.
GPUAdreno 740Adreno 735The Samsung's GPU may offer a slight advantage in gaming performance.
RAM (GB)8/1212/16The Motorola offers more RAM in its configurations, benefiting multitasking and demanding applications.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)20050Samsung boasts higher megapixel count; image quality depends on sensor size, processing, and other factors. Real-world comparisons are necessary.
DxOMark Score140146Motorola achieves a higher overall DxOMark score, suggesting superior camera performance according to their testing methodology. Individual scores for photo and video detail further insights.
Video CapabilitiesUp to 8K@30fpsUp to 4K@60fpsThe Samsung can record at a higher resolution (8K), while both offer standard high-quality video recording options.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50004500The Samsung has a larger battery, potentially offering longer battery life.
Fast Charging (W)45125The Motorola supports significantly faster charging, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Advantages:

  • Sharper Display: Higher resolution for crisper visuals.
  • Larger Battery: Potentially longer battery life.
  • 8K Video Recording: Capability to record in higher resolution.

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Advantages:

  • Higher Refresh Rate: Smoother scrolling and animations.
  • Brighter Display: Better outdoor visibility.
  • Faster Charging: Significantly reduced charging time.
  • Higher DxOMark Score: Suggests better overall camera performance based on standardized testing.
  • More RAM: Better for multitasking and demanding applications.
  • Lighter and Slightly Smaller: Improved handling.

Trade-offs:

  • Samsung: Higher resolution display and larger battery for potentially increased weight and power consumption.
  • Motorola: Lower resolution display and smaller battery for lighter weight and faster charging.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra: Users who prioritize a sharp display, long battery life, and the ability to record 8K video. Ideal for content consumption, productivity, and occasional photography/videography.

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra: Users who value a smooth and responsive display, fast charging, and excellent camera performance. Suitable for gamers, power users, and photography enthusiasts.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is display sharpness vs. smoothness and brightness?
  2. Do you need the longest possible battery life, or is fast charging more crucial?
  3. Is camera quality a top priority?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy Media Consumer: Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Sharper display, larger battery).
  • Gamer/Power User: Motorola Edge 50 Ultra (Higher refresh rate, faster charging, more RAM).
  • Photography Enthusiast: Motorola Edge 50 Ultra (Higher DxOMark score, faster processor).

My Choice: Motorola Edge 50 Ultra

While the S23 Ultra has its strengths (sharper display, larger battery), the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra offers a more compelling overall package for my needs. The combination of a smooth 144Hz display, incredibly fast 125W charging, lighter weight, higher RAM, and superior DxOMark score outweighs the benefits of the Samsung. I prioritize a fluid user experience, quick charging, and excellent camera capabilities, making the Motorola the better choice for me. The slightly smaller battery is less of a concern given the significantly faster charging speed. Finally, the lower resolution, while technically less sharp, is unlikely to be a noticeable difference in everyday usage on a 6.7" display.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.