Samsung Galaxy M55 vs ZTE nubia Red Magic 9S Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 28, 2024 July 9, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 97.8 cm³ 111.51 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.72 "/g 2.97 "/g
Weight 180 g 229 g
Height 163.9 mm 164 mm
Width 76.5 mm 76.4 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Light Green
  • Dark Blue
  • Design Sleet (Black Version)
  • Snowfall (Silver Version)
  • Cyclone (Transparent Black Version)
  • Frost (White Version)

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.8 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1116 x 2480
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.4 % 89.1 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 400 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 140.57 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.13 mAh/cm³ 58.29 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 6500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 644 Adreno 750 (1 GHz)

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.2, Gen 2, OTG, DisplayPort, Accessory Connector

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M55ZTE nubia Red Magic 9S ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions163.9 x 76.5 x 7.8 mm164 x 76.4 x 8.9 mmVirtually identical footprint, but the Red Magic 9S Pro is noticeably thicker.
Weight180g229gThe Red Magic 9S Pro is significantly heavier, potentially impacting one-handed use and pocket comfort.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without more information.
Display
Size6.7"6.8"Negligible difference in screen real estate.
TypeSuper AMOLED+, 120HzAMOLED, 1B colors, 120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and vibrant colors. The Red Magic's 1B colors suggest a wider color gamut potentially offering more nuanced visuals.
Resolution1080 x 24001116 x 2480Similar pixel density (around 400 ppi) resulting in sharp visuals on both.
Peak Brightness1000 nits (HBM)1600 nits (peak)The Red Magic 9S Pro offers significantly higher peak brightness, ensuring better visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7 Gen 1Snapdragon 8 Gen 3The 8 Gen 3 in the Red Magic is a flagship processor, offering significantly higher performance for demanding tasks and gaming compared to the mid-range 7 Gen 1.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)The Red Magic's CPU boasts higher clock speeds and a more powerful core architecture, translating to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
GPUAdreno 644Adreno 750 (1 GHz)The Red Magic 9S Pro's GPU is significantly more powerful, enabling higher frame rates and better graphics in games.
RAM8GB16GBDouble the RAM in the Red Magic allows for more apps to run in the background without performance slowdown and improved multitasking.
Storage256GB512GBThe Red Magic 9S Pro offers double the storage, allowing users to store more apps, photos, and videos.
Camera
Video Capabilities4K@30fps (OIS, EIS)8K@30fps, ... up to 1080p@240fpsThe Red Magic offers superior video recording capabilities including higher resolution (8K) and higher frame rate options for slow-motion video. Missing detailed photo capabilities for both phones makes a complete camera comparison impossible.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh6500 mAhThe Red Magic 9S Pro has a larger battery capacity, potentially offering significantly longer battery life. However, its more powerful components might consume more power.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy M55 Advantages:

  • Lighter and potentially thinner: More comfortable for extended use and pocket carry.
  • Potentially more affordable: While both are in the "medium price" range, the M55's less powerful specs suggest it might be priced lower.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 9S Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful: Superior performance for demanding tasks, gaming, and multitasking.
  • Brighter Display: Enhanced outdoor visibility.
  • Larger Battery: Potential for longer battery life.
  • More RAM and Storage: Smoother multitasking and ample space for files.
  • Superior Video Recording: More versatile and higher quality video capture.

Trade-offs:

  • The Red Magic 9S Pro's higher performance comes at the cost of increased weight and potentially higher price.
  • The M55's lower specs might result in better battery life despite a smaller battery capacity, but performance will be significantly limited.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy M55: Suitable for users who prioritize:

  • Everyday tasks: Web browsing, social media, light gaming.
  • Portability and comfort: Value a lightweight and easy-to-handle phone.
  • Budget-consciousness: Seeking a balance between performance and affordability.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 9S Pro: Ideal for users who prioritize:

  • High performance: Demanding mobile gaming, heavy multitasking, content creation.
  • Bright and vibrant display: Enjoy immersive media consumption and gaming experiences.
  • Large storage capacity: Need ample space for apps, photos, and videos.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your primary use case for a smartphone? (Gaming, everyday tasks, media consumption)
  2. What is your budget? (Considering potential price differences within the "medium price" range)
  3. How important is portability and one-handed use? (Weight and thickness considerations)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy gamer on a budget: Consider the Red Magic 9S Pro if performance is paramount, even with the trade-off in weight.
  • Casual user prioritizing battery life and portability: The M55 might be a better fit, provided its battery life is sufficient for your needs.
  • Power user who needs a lightweight device: Neither phone perfectly fits this scenario. Look for alternatives that balance performance and portability.
Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.