Samsung Galaxy M55 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 28, 2024 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 97.8 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.72 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 180 g 189 g
Height 163.9 mm 164.1 mm
Width 76.5 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Light Green
  • Dark Blue
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.4 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.13 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 644 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

The Story of Two Screens: Samsung Galaxy M55 vs. ZTE Blade A75 4G

As a technology communications specialist, my goal isn't just to list specifications, but to translate them into meaningful experiences. Let's explore the Samsung Galaxy M55 and ZTE Blade A75 4G, not as mere devices, but as gateways to different mobile realities.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M55ZTE Blade A75 4GUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignSuper AMOLED+, 120Hz, vibrant colors, higher resolutionIPS LCD, 90HzThe M55 offers a significantly richer visual experience with smoother scrolling and more vibrant colors.
Interaction FlowSnapdragon 7 Gen 1 processor, 8GB RAMUnisoc T606 processor, 4GB RAMThe M55 promises snappier performance for multitasking and demanding applications, leading to a more fluid user experience.
Accessibility FeaturesUnder-display fingerprint sensorSide-mounted fingerprint sensorBoth offer biometric security, but the M55's under-display sensor provides a more modern and integrated aesthetic.
Design ErgonomicsSlimmer (7.8mm), potentially lighter feelSlightly thicker (8.6mm)The M55 might offer a more comfortable in-hand feel due to its slimmer profile.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're a freelance photographer editing photos on the go. The M55's vibrant Super AMOLED+ display with a 120Hz refresh rate brings your images to life with stunning clarity and smooth transitions. The powerful Snapdragon processor ensures seamless editing in professional applications. Meanwhile, the A75's IPS LCD and less powerful processor might struggle with demanding tasks, potentially impacting your workflow.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

User Profile 1: The Power User: For someone who demands top-tier performance, the M55's superior processor and vibrant display are essential.

User Profile 2: The Budget-Conscious User: The A75 offers essential features at a lower price point. While performance might not be as robust, it caters to users prioritizing affordability.

User Profile 3: The Casual User: Both phones offer ample storage for everyday use. The choice hinges on individual preferences for display quality and budget.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Beyond the Specs: While the A75 offers excellent value, the M55 invests in a premium user experience through its display and processing power. Choosing between them boils down to prioritizing visual fidelity, performance smoothness, and overall design aesthetics versus budget constraints.

Conclusion:

The Samsung Galaxy M55 and ZTE Blade A75 4G tell two distinct stories. The M55 champions a premium, visually immersive experience driven by powerful components. The A75 provides a more accessible entry point, prioritizing functionality over sheer performance. By understanding these narratives, users can make informed choices aligned with their individual needs and priorities.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.