Samsung Galaxy M55 vs Xiaomi Poco M6 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 28, 2024 June 13, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 97.8 cm³ 106.77 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.72 "/g 3.31 "/g
Weight 180 g 205 g
Height 163.9 mm 168.6 mm
Width 76.5 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Light Green
  • Dark Blue
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.79 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2460
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.4 % 85.1 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits 550 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 109.10 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.13 mAh/cm³ 47.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5030 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Helio G91 Ultra (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 644 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M55 vs. Xiaomi Poco M6 4G: Detailed Comparison

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M55Xiaomi Poco M6 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions163.9 x 76.5 x 7.8 mm168.6 x 76.3 x 8.3 mmThe Poco M6 is noticeably larger and slightly thicker.
Weight180g205gThe M55 is significantly lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use.
Fingerprint SensorUnder displaySide-mountedPreference-based, but under-display is often perceived as more modern. Side-mounted can be easier to reach for some.
Display
Display TypeSuper AMOLED+, 120HzIPS LCD, 90HzThe M55's AMOLED display offers more vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency. The 120Hz refresh rate on the M55 will result in smoother animations and scrolling compared to the 90Hz on the Poco M6.
Size6.7"6.79"Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2460Virtually identical pixel density, resulting in similar sharpness.
Brightness (HBM)1000 nits550 nitsThe M55 will be significantly more readable in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm)Helio G91 Ultra (12nm)The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 offers significantly better performance and power efficiency due to its superior architecture and smaller manufacturing process.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)The M55 boasts a more modern and powerful CPU architecture, leading to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
GPUAdreno 644Mali-G52 MC2The Adreno 644 is considerably more powerful, resulting in superior gaming and graphics performance.
RAM8GB8GBBoth phones offer the same amount of RAM, enabling good multitasking capabilities.
Storage256GB256GBIdentical storage capacity on both devices.
Camera
Video Capabilities4K@30fps (OIS, EIS), 1080p@30/60fps (OIS, EIS)1080p@30fpsThe M55 offers superior video recording capabilities with 4K resolution and both Optical (OIS) and Electronic (EIS) image stabilization for smoother footage. Information about the Poco M6's camera capabilities is limited.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5030 mAhNegligible difference in battery capacity. Real-world battery life will depend more on software optimization and display type.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy M55 Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 outperforms the Helio G91 Ultra in CPU, GPU, and power efficiency.
  • Superior display: The AMOLED display with 120Hz refresh rate offers a more visually appealing and responsive experience. Higher brightness ensures better outdoor visibility.
  • More advanced video recording: 4K resolution, OIS, and EIS provide higher quality and smoother videos.
  • Lighter and more compact: Easier to handle and carry.

Xiaomi Poco M6 4G Advantages:

  • Lower price: Positioned in the "low price" range, offering potentially better value for budget-conscious buyers.
  • Slightly larger battery: Marginally larger battery capacity, but real-world difference might be negligible.

Trade-offs:

  • The Poco M6 sacrifices performance, display quality, and camera features for a lower price point.
  • The M55 comes at a premium ("medium price range") for its superior features.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy M55: Users who prioritize performance, a high-quality display, a good camera, and a premium feel. Suitable for demanding tasks like gaming, content creation, and media consumption.

Xiaomi Poco M6 4G: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality and long battery life over high-end features. Suitable for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and communication.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco M6 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your performance needs? For gaming or demanding apps, the M55 is essential.
  3. How important is display quality? The M55's AMOLED display offers a superior visual experience.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Gamer: Samsung Galaxy M55
  • Heavy social media user: Either phone would suffice, but the M55 offers a smoother scrolling experience.
  • Budget-conscious buyer: Xiaomi Poco M6 4G
  • User who prioritizes outdoor visibility: Samsung Galaxy M55 due to the significantly brighter display.
Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.