Samsung Galaxy M55 vs Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 28, 2024 May 30, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 97.8 cm³ 100.95 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.72 "/g 3.53 "/g
Weight 180 g 190 g
Height 163.9 mm 162.6 mm
Width 76.5 mm 74.8 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Light Green
  • Dark Blue
  • Caramel Latte
  • Scarlet Wave

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.4 % 89.1 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.13 mAh/cm³ 49.53 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 644 Adreno 710

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 15

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M55Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions163.9 x 76.5 x 7.8 mm162.6 x 74.8 x 8.3 mmMotorola is slightly shorter, narrower, but thicker. Negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight180g190gSamsung is slightly lighter, potentially more comfortable for extended use.
Display
Display TypeSuper AMOLED+, 120HzP-OLED, 1B colors, 120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and vibrant colors. AMOLED generally offers deeper blacks. The Motorola's 1B color capability suggests a wider color gamut potentially offering richer color reproduction.
Size6.7"6.7"Identical screen size.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2400Identical resolution, resulting in similar sharpness.
Peak BrightnessNot specified1200 nitsMotorola's higher peak brightness ensures better visibility in direct sunlight. Samsung's peak brightness is unknown, making a direct comparison impossible.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm)Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm)Samsung's 7 Gen 1 offers noticeably better performance in demanding tasks and gaming due to its more powerful CPU and GPU.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Samsung's CPU configuration offers a higher clock speed on its performance cores, translating to faster processing in demanding applications.
GPUAdreno 644Adreno 710Samsung's GPU provides a significant performance advantage for gaming and graphically intensive tasks.
RAM8GB8GBIdentical RAM capacity, enabling similar multitasking capabilities.
Storage256GB256GBIdentical storage capacity.
Camera
Video Capabilities4K@30fps (OIS, EIS), 1080p@30/60fps (OIS, EIS)4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fpsBoth offer 4K recording. Motorola offers 1080p at 120fps for slow-motion video. Specific sensor details are missing, limiting a comprehensive comparison. Samsung explicitly mentions OIS and EIS for smoother and more stable video recording which isn't mentioned for the Motorola.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhIdentical battery capacity, suggesting similar battery life, though real-world usage may vary due to different chipsets and software optimization.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy M55 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 significantly outperforms the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance.
  • Potentially Better Video Stabilization: Explicit mention of OIS and EIS suggests superior video stabilization compared to the Motorola.

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) Advantages:

  • Higher Peak Brightness: Ensures better screen visibility outdoors.
  • High Refresh Rate Slow-Motion Video: Offers 120fps slow-motion video recording at 1080p.
  • Confirmed OS Upgrade: Guaranteed upgrade to Android 15.
  • Potentially Wider Color Gamut: 1B color display might offer richer colors. Barometer Sensor Useful for altitude tracking and weather applications.

Trade-offs:

  • Performance vs. Features: Samsung prioritizes performance, while Motorola offers features like a stylus (not detailed in provided specs but implied by the name), potentially wider color gamut, and confirmed OS upgrade path.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy M55: Ideal for users who prioritize performance for demanding tasks like gaming, content creation, or heavy multitasking.

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024): Suitable for users who value bright displays for outdoor use, slow-motion video recording, and the potential benefits of a stylus for note-taking and drawing. The confirmed OS upgrade also makes it a good choice for users prioritizing long-term software support.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. Is raw performance a priority? If yes, the Samsung Galaxy M55 is the better choice.
  2. Do you need a stylus for note-taking or drawing? If yes, the Motorola Moto G Stylus (assuming it includes a stylus as its name implies) might be more suitable. We need more information to confirm this.
  3. Is outdoor visibility crucial? If so, the Motorola's higher peak brightness is advantageous.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Gamer: Samsung Galaxy M55
  • Outdoor Enthusiast: Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)
  • Note-taker/Artist: Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) (assuming stylus inclusion)
  • Budget-Conscious User Seeking Long-Term Software Support: Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)
Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.