Samsung Galaxy M55 vs Honor Magic V3 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 28, 2024 July 19, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 97.8 cm³ 98.98 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.72 "/g 3.5 "/g
Weight 180 g 226 g
Height 163.9 mm 156.6 mm
Width 76.5 mm 145.3 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 4.35 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Light Green
  • Dark Blue
  • Red
  • Snow
  • Velvet Black
  • Tundra Green

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 7.92 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 2156 x 2344
Aspect Ratio 20:9 16:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.4 % 88.6 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 402 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1800 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 82.10 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.13 mAh/cm³ 52.03 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5150 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 644 Adreno 750

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.1
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.1, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Unveiling the Mobile Experience: Samsung Galaxy M55 vs. Honor Magic V3

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to illuminate the user experience behind the specifications. Let's delve into a comparative analysis of the Samsung Galaxy M55 and the Honor Magic V3, focusing on how design choices translate into real-world usability.

1. Design and Usability Assessment: A Tale of Two Forms

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M55Honor Magic V3User Experience Impact
Design PhilosophyClassic Slab DesignFoldable InnovationThe Magic V3's foldable design offers versatility and portability, transforming the mobile experience.
Interface DesignFamiliar Android ExperienceFoldable-optimized Android with split-screen capabilitiesThe Magic V3 adapts to different usage modes, enhancing multitasking and content consumption.
Interaction FlowTraditional touch-based navigationTouch and Fold interactions, potentially gesture controlsFolding and unfolding introduce new interaction possibilities, impacting usability and learning curve.
AccessibilityStandard Android accessibility featuresPotentially enhanced accessibility due to larger screen when unfoldedFoldable design might improve content accessibility for users with visual impairments.
Design ErgonomicsStandard smartphone ergonomics, lightweight (180g)Foldable design impacts portability and one-handed use; heavier (226g)The M55 prioritizes traditional comfort, while the V3 offers a trade-off between portability and screen real estate.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration: Stories of Use

Scenario 1: The Commuter: Imagine a daily commute. The M55, with its sleek, lightweight design, slips effortlessly into a pocket, ready for quick checks and one-handed use. The Magic V3, while heavier, transforms into a mini-tablet for immersive reading or video watching during the journey. The foldable design allows for a more engaging content experience, but requires two hands for comfortable use.

Scenario 2: The Content Creator: The M55 offers a vibrant Super AMOLED+ display for content creation on the go. However, the Magic V3’s expansive foldable screen provides a larger canvas for editing photos and videos, enabling a more professional mobile workflow. The V3's superior processing power (Snapdragon 8 Gen 3) also ensures smoother multitasking for demanding creative tasks.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation: Diverse Perspectives

User 1: The Tech Minimalist: The M55 caters to users seeking a familiar, reliable smartphone experience without the complexities of a foldable device.

User 2: The Multitasking Power User: The Magic V3 empowers users who demand maximum productivity and immersive content consumption, embracing the innovative possibilities of a foldable screen.

User 3: The Accessibility-Focused User: While both devices offer standard Android accessibility features, the Magic V3's larger unfolded screen could benefit users with low vision, making content easier to read and interact with.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework: Guiding Your Choice

Choosing between the M55 and Magic V3 hinges on your individual needs and priorities.

Prioritize:

  • Familiarity and affordability: Choose the Galaxy M55.
  • Innovation and multi-tasking power: Choose the Honor Magic V3.

Beyond the Specs: Consider how each phone's design philosophy aligns with your lifestyle and technology preferences. Do you value portability and ease of use above all else, or are you willing to embrace a new form factor for enhanced productivity and immersive experiences? This is where design thinking truly informs the decision-making process.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.