Samsung Galaxy M55 vs Apple iPhone 16 Plus - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 28, 2024 September 20, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 97.8 cm³ 97.64 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.72 "/g 3.37 "/g
Weight 180 g 199 g
Height 163.9 mm 160.9 mm
Width 76.5 mm 77.8 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Light Green
  • Dark Blue
  • Black
  • White
  • Pink
  • Teal
  • Ultramarine

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1290 x 2796
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.4 % 88 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 460 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A 1000 nits
HBM Brightness 1000 nits 2000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 104.12 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.13 mAh/cm³ 47.87 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4674 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) Apple A18 (3 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Hexa-core (2x4.04 GHz + 4x2.20 GHz)
GPU Adreno 644 Apple GPU (5-core graphics)

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, DisplayPort

Software

Operating System Android iOS
Initial OS Version 14 18
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

The Tale of Two Titans: Samsung Galaxy M55 vs. iPhone 16 Plus

As a technology communications specialist, my mission isn't just to compare specs, but to weave a narrative that illuminates the user experience. Let's embark on a journey to understand how the Samsung Galaxy M55 and iPhone 16 Plus cater to you.

1. Design and Usability: A Comparative Matrix

Both phones boast sleek designs and powerful features, but their philosophies differ significantly.

Feature CategorySamsung Galaxy M55Apple iPhone 16 PlusUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignAndroid 14: Customizable, Widget-focusediOS 18: Streamlined, App-centricAndroid offers greater personalization; iOS prioritizes simplicity and consistency.
Interaction FlowNavigation buttons/Gestures, Open App EcosystemGesture-based Navigation, Curated App EcosystemAndroid provides flexibility; iOS offers a more controlled, predictable experience.
AccessibilityExtensive Android Accessibility SuiteComprehensive iOS Accessibility FeaturesBoth platforms offer robust accessibility options.
Design ErgonomicsLarger footprint, Lighter (180g), Under-display FingerprintSlightly smaller, Heavier (199g), Face IDM55 might feel lighter in hand; iPhone potentially offers more secure unlocking.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration: Bringing Features to Life

Scenario: Imagine you're a budding photographer. The M55's 4K@30fps video with OIS and EIS allows you to capture smooth, stabilized footage of a bustling street market, even while walking. The iPhone 16 Plus counters with 4K@60fps HDR video, delivering incredibly detailed and vibrant videos of a fast-paced sporting event. The choice hinges on your creative priorities: smooth stability versus vibrant detail.

Design Choice Impact: The M55's under-display fingerprint sensor allows for quick, intuitive unlocking while maintaining a clean front aesthetic. The iPhone 16 Plus opts for Face ID, prioritizing security and seamless integration with Apple's ecosystem.

3. Inclusive Technology: A Spectrum of Needs

Diverse User Perspectives: A student might appreciate the M55's customizable Android interface and expandable storage options. A professional who values seamless integration with other Apple devices might gravitate towards the iPhone 16 Plus and its cohesive ecosystem. A senior user might find the larger display text options on both devices beneficial, but prefer the familiarity and simplicity of iOS.

Recommendations: Both devices offer strong accessibility features. Individual preferences and specific needs (e.g., visual impairment, dexterity challenges) should guide the final decision. Consulting accessibility resources for each platform is recommended.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework: Beyond the Specs

User-Friendly Guidance: Choosing between these phones isn't about raw power, but about finding the right fit. Do you crave customization and flexibility? The M55 beckons. Do you prioritize a streamlined, predictable experience within a tightly integrated ecosystem? The iPhone 16 Plus awaits.

Intuitive Comparison: Consider your daily workflow, preferred interaction style, and the ecosystem you're already invested in.

Design-Driven Insights: Both phones showcase excellent design, but with distinct personalities. The M55 embraces open customization, while the iPhone 16 Plus embodies refined control. Ultimately, the best device is the one that resonates most with your individual needs and preferences.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.