Samsung Galaxy M35 vs Nothing CMF Phone 1 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 24, 2024 July 9, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 116.09 cm³ 103.55 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 2.97 "/g 3.39 "/g
Weight 222 g 197 g
Height 162.3 mm 164 mm
Width 78.6 mm 77 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue
  • Black
  • Orange
  • Light Green

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.8 % 85.1 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 2000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 137.74 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.69 mAh/cm³ 48.29 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 6000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Exynos 1380 (5 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MP5 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M35 vs. Nothing CMF Phone 1: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones beyond the spec sheet. Let's delve into a user-centered comparison of the Samsung Galaxy M35 and the Nothing CMF Phone 1, focusing on how design choices translate into real-world experiences.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M35Nothing CMF Phone 1User Experience Impact
Interface DesignSamsung One UI (Android 14)Nothing OS 2.0 (Android 14)Samsung offers a familiar, feature-rich interface. Nothing OS emphasizes minimalism and unique glyph interface, potentially appealing to users seeking a fresh look.
Interaction FlowStandard Android navigation, side-mounted FP sensorGesture-based navigation, under-display FP sensorNothing's under-display fingerprint sensor and gesture navigation offer a more modern, seamless interaction. Samsung's side-mounted sensor is arguably more reliable.
AccessibilityStandard Android accessibility featuresTBD - Dependent on Nothing OS 2.0 implementationBoth run Android 14, offering a robust foundation for accessibility. Specific features within each OS will determine the overall accessibility experience.
Design ErgonomicsLarger, heavier (222g), thicker (9.1mm)Slimmer, lighter (197g), thinner (8.2mm)Nothing Phone 1 offers a more comfortable one-handed experience due to its lighter and thinner profile. However, the M35's larger display may be preferred by some.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're a busy professional constantly on the go.

  • Battery Life: The Galaxy M35, with its massive 6000mAh battery, acts like a tireless workhorse, powering through your day and beyond. Think of it as a high-capacity fuel tank for your digital life, ensuring you stay connected even during the longest days. The Nothing Phone 1, while boasting a respectable 5000mAh battery, might require a top-up by the evening.
  • Display: Both phones offer vibrant 120Hz AMOLED displays for smooth scrolling and vibrant visuals. However, the Nothing Phone 1 boasts a significantly brighter peak brightness (2000 nits), making it incredibly legible even under direct sunlight – picture yourself effortlessly checking emails outdoors on a bright summer day. The M35's 1000 nits is still bright, but not as resilient in extreme sunlight.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For the Tech-Savvy User: The Nothing Phone 1, with its unique glyph interface and emphasis on minimalist design, might appeal to those who appreciate innovative and distinctive technology.
  • For the Pragmatic User: The Samsung Galaxy M35, with its larger battery, familiar interface, and potentially more reliable fingerprint sensor, offers a practical and dependable user experience.
  • For Users with Accessibility Needs: A detailed comparison of the specific accessibility features implemented in One UI and Nothing OS 2.0 is crucial to determine which device best caters to individual needs.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Choosing between these phones boils down to your priorities:

  • Prioritize Battery Life and Familiarity: Choose the Samsung Galaxy M35.
  • Prioritize Unique Design, Slim Profile, and Outdoor Visibility: Choose the Nothing CMF Phone 1.

Conclusion:

The Samsung Galaxy M35 and Nothing CMF Phone 1 offer distinct design philosophies and user experiences. By understanding these nuances, you can make an informed decision based on your individual needs and preferences. My analysis aims to empower you to choose technology that seamlessly integrates into your life, not just based on specifications, but on the overall experience it offers.

Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.