Samsung Galaxy M35 vs Motorola Moto G35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 24, 2024 September 25, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 116.09 cm³ 98.58 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 2.97 "/g 3.57 "/g
Weight 222 g 188 g
Height 162.3 mm 166.3 mm
Width 78.6 mm 76 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue
  • Midnight Black
  • Sage Green
  • Leaf Green
  • Guava Red

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.72 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.8 % 86.3 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 392 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 137.74 mAh/in² 110.72 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.69 mAh/cm³ 50.72 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 6000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1380 (5 nm) Unisoc T760 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x Cortex-A76 & 4x Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MP5 Mali-G57

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M35 vs. Motorola Moto G35: Detailed Comparison

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M35Motorola Moto G35Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions162.3 x 78.6 x 9.1 mm166.3 x 76 x 7.8 mmThe Moto G35 is slightly taller and narrower, but noticeably thinner than the M35. The M35 might feel bulkier.
Weight222g188gThe Moto G35 is significantly lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without material information.
Display
Display TypeSuper AMOLED, 120HzIPS LCD, 120HzThe M35's Super AMOLED display will likely offer more vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency. The Moto G35's IPS LCD might have better color accuracy in bright sunlight. Both offer smooth scrolling thanks to the 120Hz refresh rate.
Size6.6 inches6.72 inchesThe Moto G35 offers a slightly larger screen size for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution1080 x 23401080 x 2400Very similar pixel density, resulting in nearly identical sharpness.
Peak BrightnessNot specified for typical, 1000 nits (HBM)1000 nits (peak)While both have high peak brightness, lacking the typical brightness for the M35 makes it difficult to fully compare outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1380 (5nm)Unisoc T760 (6nm)The Exynos 1380 is generally considered a more powerful and efficient chipset than the Unisoc T760, likely resulting in smoother performance and better battery life for the M35.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x Cortex-A76 & 4x Cortex-A55)The Exynos 1380's CPU configuration suggests a performance advantage in demanding tasks.
GPUMali-G68 MP5Mali-G57The M35's Mali-G68 MP5 GPU is more powerful, offering better gaming performance and smoother graphics rendering.
RAM8GB8GBBoth phones offer the same amount of RAM, enabling efficient multitasking.
Storage256GB128GBThe M35 offers double the internal storage, allowing users to store more apps, photos, and videos.
Battery
Capacity6000 mAh5000 mAhThe M35 boasts a larger battery capacity, likely translating to longer battery life.
Camera
Video Capabilities4K@30fps (EIS), 1080p@30/60fps (EIS), 720p@480fps (EIS)4K@30fps, 1080p@30fpsThe M35 offers more versatile video recording options, including higher frame rates and slow-motion capabilities at 720p. Both offer 4K recording. Missing details about specific camera sensors and lens configurations limit a complete comparison.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy M35 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Exynos 1380 chipset and Mali-G68 MP5 GPU provide a significant performance advantage for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Longer Battery Life: The larger 6000mAh battery promises extended usage time.
  • More Storage: Double the internal storage (256GB) compared to the Moto G35.
  • Vibrant Display: The Super AMOLED display delivers richer colors and deeper blacks.
  • More Versatile Video Recording: Offers slow-motion and higher frame rate options.

Motorola Moto G35 Advantages:

  • Lighter and Thinner: More comfortable for one-handed use and carrying in pockets.
  • Potentially Better Color Accuracy: IPS LCD might offer better color reproduction in direct sunlight.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy M35: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, long battery life, ample storage, and a vibrant display. Suitable for gamers, power users, and those who consume a lot of media.

Motorola Moto G35: Best suited for users who value a lightweight and slim design, prioritize affordability, and prefer a potentially more color-accurate display in bright conditions. Good for casual users, budget-conscious buyers, and those who prioritize portability.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? Both are mid-range, but the M35 might be slightly more expensive.
  2. What are your primary use cases? (Gaming, media consumption, productivity, etc.)
  3. Which features are most important to you? (Performance, battery life, display quality, design)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy gamer: Samsung Galaxy M35
  • Budget-conscious user who primarily uses social media and browsing: Motorola Moto G35
  • User who needs long battery life and ample storage for photos and videos: Samsung Galaxy M35
  • User who prioritizes a lightweight and comfortable phone for everyday use: Motorola Moto G35
Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.