Samsung Galaxy M33 vs Motorola Moto G35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 8, 2022 September 25, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 119.56 cm³ 98.58 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.57 "/g
Weight 198 g 188 g
Height 165.4 mm 166.3 mm
Width 76.9 mm 76 mm
Thickness 9.4 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • Green
  • Brown
  • Midnight Black
  • Sage Green
  • Leaf Green
  • Guava Red

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.72 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.5 % 86.3 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 392 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 110.72 mAh/in²
Battery Density 41.82 mAh/cm³ 50.72 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1280 (5 nm) Unisoc T760 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x Cortex-A76 & 4x Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 Mali-G57

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M33 vs. Motorola Moto G35: A Deep Dive for the Discerning Smartphone User

Let's cut through the marketing fluff and dissect the Samsung Galaxy M33 and the Motorola Moto G35, focusing on what truly matters: how these devices perform in the real world. As a tech journalist with an engineering background, I'll break down the specs, analyze their practical implications, and help you decide which phone best fits your needs.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here's a head-to-head comparison of the key specs, along with their real-world impact:

Design

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M33Motorola Moto G35Real-World Implications
Dimensions165.4 x 76.9 x 9.4 mm166.3 x 76 x 7.8 mmMoto G35 is slightly thinner and lighter, potentially more comfortable for one-handed use and pocket portability.
Weight198g188gMoto G35's lighter weight might be noticeable during extended use, reducing hand fatigue.
Build QualityGorilla Glass 5Gorilla Glass 3M33 offers better screen protection against scratches and drops.

Display

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M33Motorola Moto G35Real-World Implications
Size6.6"6.72"Moto G35 offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive media consumption.
Resolution1080 x 24081080 x 2400Negligible difference in sharpness; both offer crisp visuals.
TechnologyTFT LCDIPS LCDMoto G35's IPS LCD provides wider viewing angles and better color reproduction than the M33's TFT LCD.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations, enhancing the user experience.
Brightness0 nits (Unspecified)1000 nitsMoto G35's significantly higher brightness ensures excellent outdoor visibility, even in direct sunlight. This is a major advantage.

Performance

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M33Motorola Moto G35Real-World Implications
ChipsetExynos 1280 (5nm)Unisoc T760 (6nm)M33's Exynos 1280 generally offers better performance and efficiency, though real-world usage will depend on optimization.
Antutu Score475,448423,297M33 benchmarks slightly higher, indicating potentially faster app loading and smoother multitasking.
GPUMali-G68Mali-G57M33 likely has a more powerful GPU, beneficial for gaming and graphically demanding tasks.
RAM6GB/8GB4GB/8GBBoth offer options for ample RAM; 8GB variants will provide smoother multitasking.

Camera

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M33Motorola Moto G35Real-World Implications
Main Camera50MP, f/1.850MP, f/1.8Comparable main cameras likely produce similar image quality in good lighting.
Selfie Camera8MP, f/2.216MP, f/2.45Moto G35 boasts a higher resolution selfie camera, potentially capturing more detail.
Wide Angle5MP, f/2.28MP, f/2.2Moto G35's wider angle lens captures a broader field of view.
VersatilityMacro & Depth lensesNoneM33 offers greater versatility with dedicated macro and depth sensors for close-up shots and portrait mode effects.

Battery Life

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M33Motorola Moto G35Real-World Implications
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery capacities suggest comparable battery life, though real-world usage can vary.
Charging25W Fast Charging18W Fast ChargingM33 charges significantly faster, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Insights

  • Display: The Moto G35's brighter IPS LCD is a clear winner for outdoor use.
  • Performance: The M33 generally offers better performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Camera: The M33's versatile camera system with macro and depth lenses offers more creative options, while the G35 boasts a higher-resolution selfie camera.
  • Battery: While both have the same capacity, the M33's faster charging provides a practical advantage.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • M33: Best for users who prioritize performance, faster charging, a versatile camera, and don't mind a slightly less bright display. Ideal for gamers, multitaskers, and content creators.
  • G35: Best for users who primarily value a bright, vibrant display for media consumption and outdoor use. Suitable for casual users, social media enthusiasts, and those who prioritize battery life over peak performance.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. Is outdoor visibility crucial? If yes, the Moto G35's 1000 nit display is a game-changer.
  2. Do you prioritize performance for gaming or demanding apps? If yes, the M33's Exynos 1280 offers a noticeable advantage.
  3. How important is fast charging? The M33's 25W charging will significantly reduce downtime compared to the G35's 18W.

My Choice: The Samsung Galaxy M33

While the Moto G35's incredibly bright display is tempting, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M33. The superior performance of the Exynos 1280, coupled with faster charging and a more versatile camera system, aligns better with my needs as a power user. The slightly dimmer display is a trade-off I'm willing to make for the overall smoother and more capable experience. The added benefit of Gorilla Glass 5 over Gorilla Glass 3 further solidifies my decision, ensuring greater durability in the long run. Ultimately, the M33 provides a more well-rounded package for my usage patterns.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.