Samsung Galaxy M13 vs Motorola Moto G35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date July 1, 2022 September 25, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 106.84 cm³ 98.58 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.57 "/g
Weight 192 g 188 g
Height 165.4 mm 166.3 mm
Width 76.9 mm 76 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Light Blue
  • Deep Green
  • Orange Copper
  • Midnight Black
  • Sage Green
  • Leaf Green
  • Guava Red

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.72 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.5 % 86.3 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 392 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 110.72 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.8 mAh/cm³ 50.72 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 850 (8 nm) Unisoc T760 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x Cortex-A76 & 4x Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 Mali-G57

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Samsung Galaxy M13 and the Motorola Moto G35, dissecting their specifications and translating them into real-world implications for you.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M13Motorola Moto G35Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4166.3 x 76 x 7.8Moto G35 slightly larger, thinner. Negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight (g)192188Moto G35 slightly lighter. Again, minimal difference in actual use.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.72Moto G35 has a marginally larger screen.
Resolution1080 x 24081080 x 2400Virtually identical sharpness.
TypePLS LCDIPS LCD, 120HzMoto G35's 120Hz refresh rate delivers significantly smoother scrolling and animations. Big advantage.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 850 (8nm)Unisoc T760 (6nm)Moto G35 likely has a performance edge due to more modern architecture and smaller process node.
CPUOcta-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55Octa-core (1x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x Cortex-A76 & 4x Cortex-A55)Moto G35 has faster, more powerful cores, translating to better multitasking and demanding apps.
GPUMali-G52Mali-G57Moto G35's GPU should offer improved gaming performance.
RAM4GB8GBMoto G35 offers double the RAM, crucial for smooth multitasking and keeping apps open in the background.
Camera
Main50MP50MPComparable resolution; real-world performance will depend on sensor quality and image processing.
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fpsMoto G35 capable of recording in much higher resolution.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhIdentical battery capacity. Actual battery life depends on usage and optimization.
Charging15W Fast Charging18W Fast ChargingMoto G35 charges slightly faster.

2. Key Insights

  • Display: The Moto G35's 120Hz display is a game-changer, providing a noticeably smoother and more responsive user experience. This is a major differentiator.
  • Performance: The Moto G35, with its more powerful processor, greater RAM, and superior GPU, will handle demanding tasks and multitasking more effectively. The Galaxy M13 might show some lag with heavy usage.
  • Camera: While both have 50MP main cameras, the Moto G35's ability to record 4K video gives it a significant edge for content creators. Image quality will depend on factors beyond resolution, requiring real-world testing to definitively compare.
  • Battery Life: Similar battery capacities suggest comparable longevity, but real-world usage will vary. The Moto G35's slightly faster charging could be beneficial for some.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Samsung Galaxy M13: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic smartphone functionality and long battery life. Less demanding users, primarily focused on communication, social media, and light browsing, will find it adequate.
  • Motorola Moto G35: Ideal for users who value a smooth and responsive experience, enjoy mobile gaming, or need a phone for more demanding tasks. Content creators will appreciate the 4K video recording.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • Are you a power user or a casual user? Power users will appreciate the Moto G35's superior performance and display.
  • Is a smooth display a priority? The Moto G35's 120Hz refresh rate is a significant advantage for visual fluidity.
  • What's your budget? While both are mid-range, pricing differences might sway the decision. Consider the value proposition offered by each device in relation to its price.

My Choice: I would choose the Motorola Moto G35. As someone who values performance, a fluid user interface, and future-proofing, the Moto G35's advantages in processing power, RAM, display refresh rate, and video recording capabilities are compelling. The slightly faster charging is a bonus. While the price difference might exist, the enhanced user experience offered by the Moto G35 would be worth the investment for me. The 120Hz display alone dramatically improves daily interaction, and the stronger performance ensures the phone remains responsive even with extended use.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.