Samsung Galaxy M12 vs Google Pixel 6 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 30, 2021 October 28, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 120.74 cm³ 110.72 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.07 "/g 3.19 "/g
Weight 212 g 210 g
Height 164 mm 163.9 mm
Width 75.9 mm 75.9 mm
Thickness 9.7 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Green
  • Stormy Black
  • Cloudy White
  • Sorta Sunny

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.7 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1440 x 3120
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.9 % 88.6 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 512 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 111.45 mAh/in²
Battery Density 41.41 mAh/cm³ 45.19 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5003 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 850 (8 nm) Google Tensor (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 Mali-G78 MP20

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.1
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.1

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Samsung Galaxy M12 vs. Google Pixel 6 Pro

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M12Google Pixel 6 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions164 × 75.9 × 9.7 mm163.9 × 75.9 × 8.9 mmM12 is slightly thicker, affecting pocketability and feel; overall volume difference is negligible
Weight212g210gBoth feel similarly weighted in hand
Display
Size6.5"6.7"Pixel 6 Pro provides a slightly larger viewing area for media and multitasking
Resolution720x16001440x3120Pixel 6 Pro offers a much sharper display, resulting in clearer text, images, and videos
PPI270512Pixel 6 Pro provides significantly higher pixel density, making images and text appear far more detailed
TechnologyPLS LCDAMOLEDPixel 6 Pro's AMOLED has deeper blacks, better contrast, more vibrant colors, and power efficiency with dark themes
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzPixel 6 Pro's display offers smoother scrolling and animations
Brightness0 nits0 nitsUnable to compare brightness due to missing data.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 850 (8 nm)Google Tensor (5 nm)Pixel 6 Pro offers significantly faster performance for all tasks, from app loading to gaming
AnTuTu Score117,341721,000Pixel 6 Pro provides a much faster and smoother overall experience, especially for demanding apps and games
GPUMali-G52Mali-G78 MP20Pixel 6 Pro provides superior graphics performance for gaming and GPU-intensive apps
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth phones should offer similar battery endurance
Charging15W Fast Charging30W Fast ChargingPixel 6 Pro charges significantly faster, reducing wait times
FeaturesNon-removableReverse, Wireless, Non-removablePixel 6 Pro can charge other devices wirelessly and offers wireless charging, adding more convenience
Camera
Main Camera48MP, f/2.0, 1/2"50MP, f/1.85, 1/1.31"Pixel 6 Pro's camera has a larger sensor, wider aperture, and higher pixel count, leading to better low light and dynamic range
Selfie Camera8MP, f/2.212MP, f/2.2, 1/2.93"Pixel 6 Pro captures better detailed selfies with larger sensor
Telephoto LensNone48MP, f/3.5, 1/2"Pixel 6 Pro offers zoom capabilities, absent on the M12
Wide Angle Lens5MP, f/2.212MP, f/2.2, 1/2.9"Pixel 6 Pro's ultrawide lens captures more detailed shots
Portrait Mode2MP Depth SensorNoneM12 has a dedicated depth sensor but Pixel 6 Pro may use software for similar effects
Macro Lens2MP Macro LensNoneM12 has a dedicated macro lens for close-up shots, while Pixel 6 Pro lacks one
Video1080p@30fps4K@60fps with OIS, EISPixel 6 Pro captures much higher resolution, smoother video with advanced stabilization
DXOMarkNot TestedMobile: 134, Selfie: 138Pixel 6 Pro has much better overall camera quality per DXOMark scores
Software
OSAndroid 11Android 12 (upgradable to 14)Pixel 6 Pro has a newer OS and longer software support, including Android 14
Connectivity
WiFi802.11b/g/n802.11a/b/g/n/ac/axPixel 6 Pro supports newer WiFi standards for faster speeds, lower latency, and better performance in crowded networks
Bluetooth5.05.2 LEPixel 6 Pro has a newer Bluetooth standard offering better energy efficiency and codec support
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, BeidouGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, QZSS, Galileo, GLONASS (L1)Pixel 6 Pro has more satellite systems for better location accuracy
SIMDual SIM (Nano)Dual SIM (Nano + eSIM)Pixel 6 Pro supports eSIM, offering additional flexibility for carrier switching
Storage
Internal32/64/128 GB128/256/512 GBPixel 6 Pro offers more storage space in all configurations
RAM3/4/6 GB12 GBPixel 6 Pro provides much better multitasking capabilities
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone supports expandable storage
Audio
QualityBasic FeaturesStereo Speakers, 3 micsPixel 6 Pro provides better audio quality with stereo speakers and improved microphones
Security
FeaturesSide-mounted fingerprintBasic fingerprint sensorM12 has a more advanced side-mounted fingerprint sensor;
Build Quality
ProtectionUnknownGorilla Glass VictusPixel 6 Pro has a much more durable screen
Sensors
SensorsFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, HallFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Magnetometer, BarometerPixel 6 Pro has additional sensors, allowing for more advanced features and environmental tracking

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy M12 Advantages:

  • Dedicated Macro Lens: Allows for close-up photography.
  • Depth Sensor: Dedicated depth sensor might provide better bokeh than software implementations.
  • Potentially Lower Price: Typically targets the budget-friendly market.
  • Side-Mounted Fingerprint Sensor: May be preferred by some users

Google Pixel 6 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Display: Higher resolution, AMOLED technology, and a faster refresh rate offer a vastly better viewing experience.
  • Much Faster Performance: The Google Tensor chip provides significantly better app loading, multitasking, and gaming performance.
  • Better Camera System: Larger sensors, better lenses, and additional features (like a telephoto lens and 4K video) deliver superior image and video quality.
  • Faster Charging & Wireless Charging: Charges much faster and offers wireless charging with reverse charging.
  • More Storage & RAM: Offers more storage and RAM for better multitasking and future-proofing.
  • Better Software: Newer OS with longer software support.
  • Advanced Connectivity: Newer Wi-Fi and Bluetooth standards.
  • Better Build Quality: Superior screen protection

Significant Trade-offs:

  • Samsung Galaxy M12: Sacrifices performance, display quality, camera capabilities, and some convenient features for affordability.
  • Google Pixel 6 Pro: Significantly more expensive, may be overkill for basic usage, does not have a macro lens or depth sensor.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy M12 Ideal User:

  • Users on a tight budget who need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like browsing, calls, and social media.
  • Users who prioritize a long battery life over advanced features.
  • Users who appreciate dedicated macro and depth cameras.

Use Cases for Samsung Galaxy M12:

  • Basic everyday communication
  • Casual social media browsing
  • Long battery life needs without intense performance requirements
  • Macro photography enthusiasts

Google Pixel 6 Pro Ideal User:

  • Users who prioritize camera quality, display performance, and overall speed.
  • Users who engage in heavy multitasking, mobile gaming, and media consumption.
  • Users who want a premium smartphone experience and access to the latest Android updates.

Use Cases for Google Pixel 6 Pro:

  • Professional photography and videography on the go.
  • Mobile gaming and other performance-intensive tasks.
  • Demanding multitasking and productivity.
  • High-quality media consumption and content creation.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • Samsung Galaxy M12: Offers good value for those on a limited budget.
  • Google Pixel 6 Pro: Offers a high-end premium experience justified by its better performance, screen, and camera capabilities.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions to Consider:

  1. What is your budget? The Pixel 6 Pro is significantly more expensive.
  2. How important are camera quality and performance? The Pixel 6 Pro is superior for both.
  3. What do you use your phone for the most? Basic tasks vs. demanding apps?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Tight Budget, Basic Use: The Samsung Galaxy M12 is the better choice.
  • Scenario 2: Moderate Budget, Camera Matters: The Google Pixel 6 Pro is the better choice if camera quality and performance are important to you, and you are willing to pay a premium.
  • Scenario 3: Power User, No Compromise: The Google Pixel 6 Pro is the clear winner for power users who need top-tier performance and features.

Personal Choice

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would pick the Google Pixel 6 Pro. While it is considerably more expensive, the improvements in display quality, processing power, and camera capabilities are significant and will greatly impact my day-to-day usage. As someone who values taking high-quality photos and videos and needs a phone that can handle demanding tasks smoothly, the Pixel 6 Pro's advantages outweigh its higher cost. The sharper screen, faster performance, better camera system, and more future-proof software are a worthwhile trade-off for me. I would also miss the wireless charging, which is a huge convenience factor. Although I would miss the macro lens, I value the overall camera system of the Pixel 6 Pro more.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.