1. Specifications Comparison
Design
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Motorola Moto G35 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 165 × 77.4 × 8.4 mm | 166.3 × 76 × 7.8 mm | The Moto G35 is slightly taller and thinner, while the A72 is wider. The A72 will feel bulkier. The G35 may be easier to handle with one hand due to it's narrower width and thinner profile. |
| Weight | 203g | 188g | The Moto G35 is noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use and carrying around. |
Display
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Motorola Moto G35 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size | 6.7" | 6.72" | Both have practically the same screen size; negligible difference. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | Both have the same Full HD+ resolution, resulting in similar sharpness. |
| PPI | 394 | 392 | Practically identical pixel density, so perceived sharpness will be indistinguishable. |
| Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | The A72's AMOLED panel offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors, making it better for media consumption and general use, particularly in darker conditions. |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 120Hz | The Moto G35 will feel smoother in general use, scrolling, and gaming due to the higher refresh rate. |
| Brightness | 800 nits | 1000 nits | The Moto G35 has noticeably better outdoor visibility with 200 nits higher peak brightness. |
Performance
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Motorola Moto G35 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8nm) | Unisoc T760 (6nm) | The Moto G35’s newer 6nm chip results in significantly better performance in benchmarks, faster app loading and smoother operation. |
| AnTuTu Score | 285,000 | 423,297 | The Moto G35 offers a much better real world experience, running apps more smoothly |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Mali-G57 | The G35's Mali-G57 is more efficient for graphics processing, potentially better for gaming |
Camera
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Motorola Moto G35 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Camera | 64MP, f/1.8, 0.8µm pixel size | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76" sensor, 0.64µm pixel size | The A72 has higher resolution, but the G35 has a larger sensor size. The A72’s resolution may offer more detail, the G35’s sensor may have better low-light performance. |
| Telephoto/Portrait | 8MP, f/2.4, 1/4.4" sensor, 1.0µm pixel size | None | The A72 provides dedicated optical zoom and better portrait shots with its dedicated lens. |
| Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.2, 0.80µm pixel size | 16MP, f/2.45, unknown pixel size | The A72 has higher resolution for selfies and a wider aperture (resulting in better low light). |
| Wide Angle Lens | 12MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm pixel size | 8MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm pixel size | The A72 offers more detailed ultra-wide shots |
| Macro Lens | 5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm pixel size | None | The A72 allows dedicated macro photography. |
| Video Recording | 4K@30fps with EIS, 1080p@30/60fps with EIS; Slow-motion: 120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps; Slow-motion: 120fps | The A72 has EIS (electronic image stabilization) for all resolutions providing smoother videos, the G35 has no mention of it and may not have it. |
| DxOMark Mobile | Overall 92 (Photo: 100, Video: 78) | N/A | The A72 has a scored in DxOMark mobile offering objective testing of the main camera. |
Battery
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Motorola Moto G35 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Both phones have similar battery capacity, expect similar battery endurance. |
| Charging | 25W Fast Charging | 18W Fast Charging | The A72 charges faster, resulting in less time plugged in. |
| Battery Type | Li-Ion | Li-Polymer | Li-Polymer batteries are generally more robust and safer than Li-Ion batteries. |
| Charger | 15W Fast Charger Included | Not specified | The A72 comes with a fast charger. The G35 may require a separate purchase. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A72 Advantages
- Superior Display: The AMOLED screen offers much richer colors, deeper blacks, and better contrast compared to the LCD on the Moto G35. This is a notable difference for media consumption.
- Versatile Camera System: The A72 includes a telephoto lens for optical zoom, a dedicated macro lens, and higher resolution ultrawide and selfie camera. This offers more flexibility in different shooting scenarios.
- Camera Video EIS: The A72 has image stabilization for videos, which would result in smoother video recording
- Faster Charging: The 25W charging speed is significantly faster than the 18W on the Moto G35, which means less time plugged in.
- Included Fast Charger: The A72 has an included 15W fast charger, whereas the G35 may not include one.
- More Comprehensive Sensors: The A72 has a more extensive sensor suite, offering additional capabilities and future-proofing.
Motorola Moto G35 Advantages
- Newer Chipset: The Unisoc T760 offers significantly better performance than the Snapdragon 720G in benchmarks, resulting in faster app loading and general use.
- Higher Refresh Rate: The 120Hz display refresh rate makes animations and scrolling look much smoother than the 90Hz on the A72.
- Brighter Display: 1000 nits brightness makes the phone more usable in direct sunlight, while the A72's 800 nits may struggle.
- Lighter Build: The Moto G35 is noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use.
- Newer OS: The Moto G35 runs on Android 14, offering a more recent software experience with updated features.
- Screen Protection: The Moto G35 has Gorilla Glass 3 protection compared to an unknown protection on the A72, offering better screen durability
- eSIM Support: The G35 supports eSIM, which allows for more flexibility when switching carriers.
Significant Trade-offs
- Display Technology: The A72 sacrifices the smoothness of a higher refresh rate for the visual quality of AMOLED, while the Moto G35 goes the other way.
- Camera Versatility: The Moto G35 lacks dedicated telephoto/portrait and macro lenses, making it less versatile than the A72.
- Video Recording: The A72 includes EIS stabilization, which the G35 does not include
- Charging Speed: The A72's faster 25W charging makes a big difference in daily use compared to the 18W on the Moto G35.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Ideal Users for Samsung Galaxy A72
- Media Enthusiasts: Users who prioritize vivid display quality for watching movies, browsing photos, and playing games that would benefit from the vibrant colours and deep blacks of AMOLED.
- Photography Fans: Users who want a versatile camera system with optical zoom, ultrawide, macro, and higher resolution selfie cameras.
- Moderate Performance Needs: Users who primarily use their phone for general usage and do not require high performance for gaming and heavy multitasking.
- Users who prefer richer colours: Users who prefer richer colours and blacker blacks may prefer the AMOLED display of the Samsung
Use Cases:
- Watching movies or TV shows on the vibrant AMOLED display.
- Taking a variety of photos, from landscapes to portraits, utilizing the versatile lens system.
- Light gaming with visual fidelity.
Ideal Users for Motorola Moto G35
- Performance Users: Users who prioritize smooth performance and responsiveness, particularly for gaming and multitasking.
- Outdoor Users: Users who spend a lot of time outdoors and need a brighter screen to view content clearly in direct sunlight.
- Battery Conscious Users: Users who want a long lasting battery and value being able to extend their battery life with a more efficient chipset.
- Users who prefer a smoother experience: Users who prefer a smoother experience may prefer the 120hz refresh rate of the G35 over the richer colours of the AMOLED in the Samsung
Use Cases:
- Playing graphically intensive mobile games.
- Using the phone for navigation and media in bright sunlight.
- Daily multitasking with multiple apps open.
Price-to-Value Ratio
- The Moto G35 provides better performance for the money, a brighter screen, and a smoother experience, making it a strong contender in the mid-range category. It may be slightly cheaper than the A72 due to being a newer device.
- The Samsung A72 justifies its higher price with a superior AMOLED display, a more versatile camera system, faster charging and includes a charger in the box.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions to Consider
- Do you prioritize display quality or performance and smoothness? If you value vibrant colors and deep blacks, the A72's AMOLED screen will be a better choice. However, if smooth scrolling and responsiveness are more important to you, the G35's 120Hz display will be more appealing.
- How important is the camera system versatility? If you frequently take photos in different scenarios and need optical zoom, the A72's camera setup will be a better fit. If you prioritize low-light performance and general photography, the G35 will be a better fit.
- How much does charging speed matter to you? If you dislike waiting for your phone to charge, the A72's faster charging will be a significant advantage.
Scenario-Based Recommendations
- For the Media Lover: If you primarily use your phone for media consumption, choose the Samsung Galaxy A72 for its beautiful AMOLED display.
- For the Gamer: If you're a gamer and prioritize performance, choose the Motorola Moto G35 for its smoother experience, more responsive display, and better chipset.
- For the Everyday Photographer: If you need versatility and features like Telephoto lens, choose the Samsung Galaxy A72, if you need general photography and low-light capabilities, choose the Motorola Moto G35.
- For the Practical User: If you need a reliable, all-round device with a brighter screen, a more updated OS and prefer a lighter, thinner device with a smoother experience, choose the Motorola Moto G35.
Final Decision
If I had to choose, I would pick the Motorola Moto G35.
Here's why:
While I appreciate the superior display technology of the Samsung Galaxy A72, the overall user experience of the Motorola Moto G35 is more aligned with my needs. The significantly better performance due to its newer chipset, the smoother 120Hz display, and the lighter build all contribute to a more enjoyable daily user experience.
I use my phone often and value responsiveness above all else, therefore I would prefer the smoother experience of the 120Hz refresh rate and the faster chipset of the Moto G35. While I appreciate having a telephoto lens for taking pictures, I prefer the newer operating system, lighter weight, brighter screen, and much faster overall performance of the G35. The inclusion of an eSIM is also a bonus. I do value a fast charging speed, but the higher performance and other advantages outweight that.
