Samsung Galaxy A55 vs Xiaomi 14T - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Xiaomi 14T
Xiaomi 14T
Xiaomi

General

Launch Date March 15, 2024 September 26, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 102.25 cm³ 94.02 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.1 "/g 3.46 "/g
Weight 213 g 193 g
Height 161.1 mm 160.5 mm
Width 77.4 mm 75.1 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon
  • Titan Black
  • Titan Gray
  • Titan Blue
  • Lemon Green

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1220 x 2712
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.8 % 89.1 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 446 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits 1600 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 4000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.9 mAh/cm³ 53.18 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1480 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Xclipse 530 Mali G615-MC6

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A55 vs. Xiaomi 14T: Detailed Comparison

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A55Xiaomi 14TPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm160.5 x 75.1 x 7.8 mmXiaomi 14T is slightly smaller and thinner, potentially offering a better one-handed grip.
Weight213 g193 gXiaomi 14T is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without material information.
Display
Size6.6 inches6.67 inchesNegligible difference in screen real estate.
TypeSuper AMOLED, 120HzAMOLED, 144HzBoth offer vibrant colors and smooth scrolling. The 144Hz refresh rate on the Xiaomi 14T might provide a slightly smoother experience in fast-paced games, but the difference is often subtle.
Resolution1080 x 23401220 x 2712Xiaomi 14T has a sharper display with higher pixel density, resulting in crisper text and images.
Peak Brightness1000 nits (HBM)4000 nits (peak)The significantly higher peak brightness of the Xiaomi 14T ensures exceptional outdoor visibility even in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1480 (4 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm)Both are modern, efficient chipsets. Performance differences would need benchmarking comparisons.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510)Xiaomi 14T's CPU configuration suggests a potential advantage in demanding tasks due to the higher clocked Cortex-A715 cores, but real-world performance depends on optimization.
GPUXclipse 530Mali G615-MC6Gaming performance differences would require benchmark comparisons.
RAM/Storage256GB/8GB, 256GB/12GB512GB/12GBXiaomi 14T offers double the base storage, beneficial for users storing large files or numerous apps.
Camera
Video Capabilities4K@30fps (EIS)Up to 4K@60fps (HDR, EIS) and 1080p@960fps (HDR, EIS)Xiaomi 14T offers more versatile video recording options, including higher resolution and frame rates with HDR and slow-motion capabilities.
Detailed Camera SpecsMissingMissingCannot compare image quality, low-light performance, and other camera features without detailed sensor and lens information.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacities suggest comparable battery life, but actual usage will depend on software optimization and user habits.
Charging SpeedNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare charging speeds without this information.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi 14T Advantages:

  • Brighter and Sharper Display: Superior outdoor visibility and crisper content consumption.
  • More Powerful CPU and GPU (Potentially): Likely smoother performance in demanding tasks and games (needs benchmark confirmation).
  • Higher Refresh Rate: Potentially smoother gaming and scrolling experience.
  • More Versatile Video Recording: Higher resolution, frame rates, and slow-motion options.
  • Larger Storage Option: More space for apps, photos, and videos.
  • Lighter Weight: More comfortable for extended use.

Samsung Galaxy A55 Advantages:

  • Potentially Longer Software Support: Samsung typically provides longer OS updates. (Based on historical trends, not confirmed specs).
  • More Color Options: Offers a wider range of aesthetic choices.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi 14T: Ideal for users prioritizing performance, a bright and sharp display, extensive video recording capabilities, ample storage, and a lightweight design. Suitable for gamers, content creators, and power users.

Samsung Galaxy A55: Potentially better for users who value software updates and a wider selection of colors. May be suitable for users with moderate usage patterns who prioritize long-term software support.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget and storage requirement? The Xiaomi 14T offers more storage but might be priced higher.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Gamers and content creators would likely prefer the Xiaomi 14T.
  3. How important are software updates and longevity? Samsung typically offers longer support.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy Gamer: Xiaomi 14T
  • Content Creator: Xiaomi 14T
  • Average User Prioritizing Value: Depends on pricing; potentially the A55 if priced significantly lower.
  • User Prioritizing Long-Term Software Updates: Samsung Galaxy A55 (based on brand history).
Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.