Samsung Galaxy A55 vs Nothing CMF Phone 1 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 15, 2024 July 9, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 102.25 cm³ 103.55 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.1 "/g 3.39 "/g
Weight 213 g 197 g
Height 161.1 mm 164 mm
Width 77.4 mm 77 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon
  • Black
  • Orange
  • Light Green

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.8 % 85.1 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 2000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.9 mAh/cm³ 48.29 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Exynos 1480 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Xclipse 530 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 18 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A55Nothing CMF Phone 1Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2164 x 77 x 8.2The Nothing phone is slightly taller and narrower. Negligible difference in hand feel for most users.
Weight (g)213197The Nothing phone is noticeably lighter, improving one-handed use and reducing pocket bulk.
Build MaterialsUnspecifiedUnspecifiedBuild quality and durability cannot be compared without further information.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.67Negligible difference in screen real estate.
TypeSuper AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+AMOLED, 120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and vibrant colors. Samsung's HDR10+ support may offer slightly better video quality in supported content.
Peak Brightness (nits)1000 (HBM)2000The Nothing phone offers significantly higher peak brightness, ensuring better outdoor visibility.
Resolution1080 x 23401080 x 2400Virtually identical pixel density, resulting in similar sharpness.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1480 (4 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm)Both are mid-range chipsets built on a 4nm process, suggesting comparable power efficiency. Performance differences require benchmark comparisons which are not available in the provided data.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)The Samsung phone has slightly faster high-performance cores, potentially offering a slight edge in demanding tasks. Real-world difference might be minimal.
GPUXclipse 530Mali-G615 MC2GPU performance comparison requires benchmarks, which are not provided. Gaming and graphics-intensive tasks may see varied performance.
RAM/Storage256GB/8GB, 256GB/12GB128GB/8GB, 256GB/8GBSamsung offers a 12GB RAM option for potentially smoother multitasking.
Other
Battery (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacity suggests comparable battery life, although real-world usage will vary.
OSAndroid 14Android 14Both launch with the latest Android version.
OS Max Version1816Samsung guarantees longer software updates, extending device lifespan and security.
NFCTrueFalseSamsung supports NFC for contactless payments and other functionalities, which the Nothing phone lacks.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A55 Advantages:

  • Longer Software Support: Guaranteed updates up to Android 18 provide better long-term value and security.
  • NFC Support: Enables contactless payments and data transfer.
  • Potentially Higher Performance: Slightly faster CPU cores and a 12GB RAM option could offer better performance in demanding tasks, but this needs further benchmarks to confirm.

Nothing CMF Phone 1 Advantages:

  • Brighter Display: Significantly brighter screen ensures excellent outdoor visibility.
  • Lighter Weight: Noticeably lighter, improving handling comfort.

Trade-offs:

  • The Nothing Phone's brighter display might come at the cost of battery life, although this is not confirmed.
  • The Samsung phone's longer software support could be prioritized over the Nothing phone's weight advantage depending on the user's needs.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A55: Users who prioritize long-term software updates, NFC functionality, and potentially smoother multitasking. Suitable for those who keep their phones for extended periods and rely on contactless payments.

Nothing CMF Phone 1: Users who value a bright, easily viewable display and a lighter, more comfortable phone. Ideal for outdoor use and those sensitive to phone weight.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How long do you typically keep your phones? If you prefer to use your phone for several years, the Samsung phone's longer software support is crucial.
  2. How important is NFC functionality for you? If you rely on contactless payments, the Samsung phone is the only option.
  3. Do you frequently use your phone outdoors in bright sunlight? If so, the Nothing phone's superior brightness is a significant advantage.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • For a user who prioritizes long-term value and uses contactless payments: The Samsung Galaxy A55 is the better choice.
  • For a user who prioritizes a bright display and comfortable handling and upgrades phones frequently: The Nothing CMF Phone 1 is a strong contender.
  • For a user on a budget: Further price comparison is needed, but the Nothing Phone's lack of NFC could be a deal-breaker for some even if it's cheaper. The storage options also favor the Samsung device, providing more base storage in its configurations.
Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.