Samsung Galaxy A54 vs Motorola Edge 50 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 May 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 99.5 cm³ 100.31 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.17 "/g 3.4 "/g
Weight 202 g 197 g
Height 158.2 mm 161.1 mm
Width 76.7 mm 72.4 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Forest Grey
  • Nordic Wood

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1220 x 2712
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 92.9 %
Pixel Density 403 PPI 446 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 2500 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 100.25 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.25 mAh/cm³ 44.86 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1380 (5 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Mali-G68 MP5 Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.1
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A 1.4
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.1, Gen 2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A54Motorola Edge 50 UltraPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2161.1 x 72.4 x 8.6The Motorola is slightly taller and wider, but thinner. The size difference is minimal in practical use.
Weight (g)202197Negligible weight difference.
Display
Display TypeSuper AMOLEDP-OLEDBoth offer excellent color and contrast. P-OLED might offer slightly deeper blacks.
Display Size (inches)6.46.7Motorola offers a larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution1080 x 23401220 x 2712Motorola has a sharper display due to higher resolution.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120144Motorola offers smoother scrolling and animations due to the higher refresh rate.
Peak Brightness (nits)1000 (HBM)2500The Motorola's significantly higher peak brightness ensures better visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1380 (5 nm)Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 offers significantly better performance and efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)The Motorola's CPU architecture and clock speeds suggest a substantial performance advantage in demanding tasks and multitasking.
GPUMali-G68 MP5Adreno 735Adreno 735 provides a superior gaming and graphics rendering experience.
RAM8GB16GBMore RAM in the Motorola allows for smoother multitasking and handling more demanding applications.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Both have high-resolution main sensors, but sensor size and aperture differ (see below).
Sensor Size (Main)1/1.56"1/1.3"The Motorola's larger sensor likely captures more light, resulting in better low-light performance and dynamic range.
Aperture (Main)f/1.8f/1.6Wider aperture on Motorola allows for more light intake, improving low-light photos.
Ultrawide (MP)1350Motorola offers a much higher resolution ultrawide camera.
Telephoto (MP)N/A64Motorola features a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom, lacking in the Samsung.
DXOMARK Score107146Significantly higher DXOMARK score indicates superior overall camera performance on the Motorola.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50004500Larger battery in the Samsung potentially offers longer battery life, but real-world usage depends on various factors including the more power-efficient chip in the Motorola.
Fast Charging (W)25125Motorola supports significantly faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Advantages:

  • Significantly higher performance: The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, coupled with more RAM, delivers a substantially smoother and faster experience, especially for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Superior camera system: Higher resolution sensors, larger sensor size on the main camera, wider aperture, dedicated telephoto lens, and a higher DXOMARK score all point to a considerably better camera experience.
  • Faster refresh rate and brighter display: The 144Hz display and 2500 nits peak brightness provide a noticeably smoother and more visible screen.
  • Much faster charging: 125W fast charging allows for incredibly quick top-ups.

Samsung Galaxy A54 Advantages:

  • Potentially longer battery life: The 5000 mAh battery may provide longer usage time, though the Motorola's more efficient chip could offset this difference. Real-world battery tests are needed for a definitive conclusion.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A54:

  • Budget-conscious users: Offers good value for its price.
  • Users prioritizing battery life: The larger battery capacity could be appealing for those who need a phone that lasts all day.
  • Light users: Suitable for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and casual photography.

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra:

  • Power users: Ideal for demanding tasks, gaming, and multitasking.
  • Photography enthusiasts: The superior camera system makes it a great choice for capturing high-quality photos and videos.
  • Users who value a premium display: The high refresh rate and brightness enhance the viewing experience.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Motorola is significantly more expensive.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Gaming, photography, and demanding tasks favor the Motorola. Basic usage and long battery life might favor the Samsung.
  3. How important is future-proofing? The Motorola's superior hardware offers better performance longevity.

My Choice: Motorola Edge 50 Ultra

While the Samsung Galaxy A54 offers a good value proposition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is the clear winner for me. The significantly improved performance, superior camera system, brighter and smoother display, and incredibly fast charging are compelling advantages. While the battery capacity is slightly smaller, the more efficient chip in the Motorola could result in comparable or even better battery life in real-world usage. The higher initial cost is justified by the substantial upgrades in key areas that significantly enhance the overall user experience. I prioritize performance, camera quality, and a smooth display experience, making the Motorola the better choice for my needs.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.