Okay, let's dive into a detailed comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G and the Motorola Moto G35. I'm going to break this down like I'm chatting with a friend who’s curious about the tech behind these phones.
1. Specifications Breakdown
Here's a look at the key specifications, focusing on what they mean for real-world use:
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G | Motorola Moto G35 | Real-World Implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Launch Date | 2021-09-01 | 2024-09-25 | The Moto G35 is significantly newer, potentially having more up-to-date features and software. |
| Dimensions | 159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm | 166.3 × 76 × 7.8 mm | The Moto G35 is taller and thinner, while the A52s 5G is slightly more compact but thicker. |
| Weight | 189g | 188g | Virtually identical weight - both feel similarly balanced in hand. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.5" | 6.72" | Moto G35 offers a slightly larger screen, better for media consumption. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | Both offer sharp, detailed images; no significant difference in clarity. |
| PPI | 405 | 392 | Very similar pixel density; both displays look sharp and clear. |
| Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | AMOLED on the A52s offers deeper blacks, better contrast and more vibrant colors. |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Smooth scrolling and animations on both; great for gaming and everyday use. |
| Brightness | 800 nits | 1000 nits | Moto G35 is more visible in bright, sunny conditions with superior brightness. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 778G 5G | Unisoc T760 | Snapdragon 778G is significantly more powerful, leading to smoother, snappier performance. |
| AnTuTu Score | 570,752 | 423,297 | The A52s 5G has considerably better performance (about 35% higher) - you will see the difference while multi-tasking and during heavy applications. |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G57 | Adreno 642L is a better GPU that helps in delivering better performance during gaming. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 5000mAh | Moto G35 is likely to offer longer battery life with a larger capacity. |
| Charging | 25W Fast Charging | 18W Fast Charging | The A52s 5G charges faster than the Moto G35 |
| Camera | |||
| Standard Camera | 64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7" | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76" | A52s 5G offers better light sensitivity and detail with a larger sensor and resolution |
| Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.0 | 16MP, f/2.45 | The A52s 5G delivers higher resolution and better light capture selfies |
| Wide Angle Lens | 12MP, f/2.2 | 8MP, f/2.2 | A52s 5G captures more detailed wide-angle shots |
| Portrait Mode Lens | 5MP, f/2.4 | Not Available | The A52s 5G has depth sensor for capturing portrait shots with more depth of field and better bokeh. |
| Macro Lens | 5MP, f/2.4 | Not Available | The A52s 5G can capture close-up details with a dedicated macro lens. |
| Video | Up to 4K@30fps with EIS | Up to 4K@30fps | Both can record in 4K, but the A52s 5G has electronic image stabilization (EIS) for steadier videos. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11 (upgradable to 14) | Android 14 | The Moto G35 offers the latest Android version out of the box; the A52s can be upgraded to Android 14 as well. |
| Connectivity | |||
| WiFi | WiFi 6 (802.11ax) | 802.11ac | The A52s 5G has a newer Wi-Fi standard for better speed and efficiency on compatible networks |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 LE | Both have Bluetooth 5.0, but the A52s 5G has wider range of additional profiles. |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo | Moto G35 has more satellite support for better location accuracy, especially in challenging locations. |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano) | Dual SIM (Nano + eSIM) | Moto G35 has eSIM support, allows you to easily switch network providers. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal Storage | 128/256GB | 128/256GB | Both offer the same maximum storage options. |
| RAM | 6/8GB | 4/8GB | Both have 8GB variants for better multitasking and gaming. |
| Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither phone supports microSD cards |
| Audio | |||
| Audio Quality | Dolby Atmos | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphones | Moto G35 has a slight edge in the audio department, with stereo speakers and 2 microphones for better audio capture. |
| Security | |||
| Security | Basic Fingerprint sensor | Side-mounted Fingerprint sensor | Moto G35 has a side-mounted sensor for more convenience |
| Build Quality | |||
| Screen Protection | Gorilla Glass 5 | Gorilla Glass 3 | A52s 5G has better screen protection against scratches and drops |
| Sensors | Biometric: Fingerprint; Motion: Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope; Proximity: Ultrasonic proximity virtual | Biometric: Fingerprint; Proximity: Proximity; Motion: Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope | A52s 5G includes more advanced sensors for additional features. |
2. Key Insights
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Strengths: Superior performance with the Snapdragon 778G, a vibrant AMOLED display with better color reproduction, a more versatile camera system with optical stabilization and macro lens, a newer Wi-Fi standard for better connectivity, better screen protection with Gorilla Glass 5.
- Advantages: Best suited for those who value gaming, high-quality visuals, and a more versatile camera experience.
- Trade-offs: Slightly older launch date, smaller battery than the Motorola, does not offer eSIM support, less screen visibility in bright sunlight.
Motorola Moto G35
- Strengths: Larger battery for extended usage, a slightly bigger display, newer software out of the box, better brightness for visibility in bright conditions, improved audio quality with stereo speakers and dual mics, eSIM support, more satellite support for accurate positioning.
- Advantages: Ideal for those who prioritize long battery life, a newer Android version, great audio experience, and convenience features such as an eSIM.
- Trade-offs: Less powerful chipset resulting in lower performance, IPS LCD panel with less vibrancy than AMOLED, a less versatile camera system with no macro lens.
3. User Profiles and Recommendations
- For Gamers and Power Users: The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is the clear winner. Its superior processor, GPU, and vibrant AMOLED screen make it better for demanding tasks and gaming. The better camera is also ideal for users who value high-quality photography and videography.
- For Everyday Users and Media Consumers: The Motorola Moto G35 is a solid choice. Its larger battery and screen, along with stereo speakers, make it excellent for consuming content, the dual SIM/eSIM feature provides added convenience. Its increased screen brightness makes it better for outdoor use.
- For Budget-Conscious Buyers: The Moto G35 is usually priced more competitively. If raw performance is not a priority, it offers excellent value for everyday use and media consumption.
4. Buying Decision Framework
Here are three questions to guide your choice:
- How important is peak performance to you?
- If smooth performance, faster app loading times, and demanding gaming is important, the Galaxy A52s 5G is the way to go.
- If you need a phone for basic social media, light gaming, and everyday tasks, the Moto G35 will be sufficient.
- How much do you value battery life?
- If you prioritize longevity and need a device that lasts more than a day, the Moto G35 is the better choice.
- If you can compromise slightly on battery for better performance and a more premium display, the Galaxy A52s 5G is good enough.
- How important is display quality for you?
- If you want vibrant colors, true blacks, and an overall immersive visual experience, go with the Galaxy A52s 5G and its AMOLED display.
- If a bigger display with good brightness is what you are looking for, then the Moto G35 is a good choice.
My Choice
If I were choosing between these two, I would lean towards the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G. While the Motorola G35 has a few advantages such as newer software, better battery life, brighter screen, and stereo speakers, for my use-case the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G offers a more versatile device. The superior performance, more detailed and better-quality display (AMOLED) would be more suitable for my personal needs in terms of gaming, image quality, and general performance. The inclusion of optical image stabilization, a wider range of camera lenses, and a better selfie camera makes it a better all-rounder.
