1. Specifications Comparison
Here's a detailed comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A52 and Motorola Moto G35, focusing on practical implications:
Design
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Moto G35 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm | 166.3 × 76 × 7.8 mm | Moto G35 is taller, A52 is thicker; G35 might feel slightly more unwieldy for smaller hands, A52 might feel more solid. |
| Weight | 189g | 188g | Virtually identical weight, so both will feel similar in hand. |
| Build | Not Specified | Not Specified | Without additional details we are unable to provide a detailed practical comparison. |
Display
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Moto G35 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size | 6.5" | 6.72" | Moto G35 has a slightly larger screen, good for media consumption and multi-tasking, but A52 will be more compact. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | Both are equally sharp, offering a great viewing experience. |
| PPI | 407 | 392 | Both have excellent pixel density, no practical visible difference in sharpness |
| Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | A52 has deeper blacks, better contrast, and more vibrant colors (better for media). G35 will have more accurate color reproduction |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 120Hz | Moto G35 has smoother scrolling and animations. A52 animations will be slightly less fluid |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 1000 nits | Moto G35 offers far superior outdoor visibility in bright sunlight. A52 outdoor usability will be poor. |
Performance
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Moto G35 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Unisoc T760 (6 nm) | Moto G35 slightly faster app loading and smoother UI, based on benchmark scores, better in gaming. |
| Antutu Score | 341,212 | 423,297 | Moto G35 offers better raw performance, better experience in demanding games. |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Mali-G57 | Different GPUs; benchmark scores suggest Moto G35 offers slightly better gaming performance. |
Camera
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Moto G35 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Camera | 64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7", Sony IMX682, 0.80µm | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76", Samsung S5KJN1, 0.64µm | A52 has larger sensor and more resolution, resulting in better low-light performance and more detail. |
| Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8", Sony IMX616, 0.80µm | 16MP, f/2.45, No sensor model , No pixel size | A52 captures more detailed selfies, performing better in low light due to wider aperture. |
| Wide Angle | 12MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm | 8MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm | A52 wide-angle captures more detailed landscape and group photos |
| Portrait (Depth) | 5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm | Not Available | A52 offers hardware based depth sensing for more accurate bokeh effects |
| Macro | 5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm | Not Available | A52 offers a macro camera for very close-up photos, enabling very creative shots. |
| Video | Up to 4K@30fps with EIS, 1080p@30/60fps with EIS | Up to 4K@30fps | A52 offers EIS for stabilization and 1080p@60fps for smoother video, while G35 lacks video stabilization. |
| Features | Quadruple camera, OIS, Ultra stable video, Night Mode | Dual camera | A52 offers more camera versatility and features, OIS helps with low light and video capture. |
Battery
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Motorola Moto G35 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 5000mAh | Moto G35 has a larger battery, likely offering longer battery life and less frequent charging. |
| Charging | 25W Fast Charging | 18W Fast Charging | A52 charges faster, reducing time spent plugged in. |
| Features | QC2.0, AFC | None | A52 supports quick charging protocols, for faster charging times |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 Advantages
- Superior Display: AMOLED panel provides richer colors, deeper blacks, and better contrast, excellent for media consumption.
- Better Camera System: Higher resolution sensors, OIS, dedicated depth and macro lenses, and more video features make it more versatile.
- Faster Charging: 25W charging reduces time plugged in, offering convenience for the user.
- More Audio Features: Dolby Atmos and Dolby Digital Plus for a more immersive audio experience.
Motorola Moto G35 Advantages
- Newer and Higher Benchmark Score: Newer chipset with higher benchmark scores, indicating better processing power and better for gaming.
- Larger Screen: 6.72-inch display for more immersive media consumption and multitasking.
- Higher Refresh Rate: 120Hz display provides a smoother visual experience.
- Better Outdoor Visibility: 1000 nits of brightness ensures clear visibility even in direct sunlight.
- Larger Battery: 5000mAh battery provides longer battery life between charges.
- Newer OS: Comes with Android 14, potentially providing longer software support window.
Practical Implications:
- The A52 excels at content consumption with its vibrant display, better camera, faster charging and enhanced audio features.
- The Moto G35 is designed for users needing a large screen, excellent outdoor visibility and long battery life, with smooth scrolling and good performance.
Trade-offs:
- The A52's older chipset results in lower benchmark scores, indicating a slight performance difference compared to Moto G35
- The G35 trades a vibrant display for a higher refresh rate, larger size, and higher brightness.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52 is Ideal for:
- Media Enthusiasts: Those who prioritize vibrant screen, enhanced audio, and great camera.
- Social Media Users: The better front camera and detailed main camera are great for photos and videos.
- Users Who Value Camera Versatility: Users who appreciate features like depth and macro sensors, OIS, and better video stabilization
- Users who value fast charging and quick top ups
Motorola Moto G35 is Ideal for:
- Outdoor Enthusiasts: Users who need excellent screen visibility in bright sunlight and long battery life.
- Frequent Travelers: Those who need long battery life and a large screen for entertainment during travel.
- Gamers on a Budget: The superior benchmark score makes the G35 better for mobile gaming, and 120hz makes gaming more responsive.
- Those who prefer stock android, with newer updates
Use Cases:
- Galaxy A52: Watching HDR content, capturing high quality photos/videos, listening to music with immersive audio.
- Moto G35: Playing mobile games, browsing outdoors, using GPS navigation, long days without needing a recharge.
Price-to-Value Ratio:
- The Moto G35 offers a better price-to-value ratio considering its better performance and newer OS, while the A52 has better screen and camera.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions:
- How important is display quality? If vibrant colors and deep blacks are essential, choose the A52, if high refresh rate, and brightness are more important choose the G35.
- Do you prioritize camera versatility or battery life? A52 has superior camera capabilities, the G35 shines with long battery.
- Are you a heavy user who spends a lot of time outdoors? The G35 excels with its bright screen and large battery, perfect for outdoor usage.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: You primarily use your phone for social media and occasional streaming: A52 would be better due to its superior camera and display, you might need to charge more frequently though.
- Scenario 2: You travel a lot and need a long lasting battery, with a good screen for maps and gaming: Moto G35 provides a better outdoor experience with great battery life, perfect for you.
- Scenario 3: You are a student and use your phone indoors for streaming and gaming: Moto G35 with its better performance, high refresh rate screen and large battery would be a great choice.
My Choice:
Given my own preferences and general user needs, I would choose the Motorola Moto G35. Here's why:
While the Samsung Galaxy A52 has a superior AMOLED display and a more versatile camera system, the Moto G35's practical advantages better suit most users. The higher refresh rate display, better benchmark score and large battery combined with the higher brightness screen for outdoor usability and a newer operating system, edge it out as the better all-round experience. While the A52's camera is better, the G35's camera is still decent, and most users will appreciate a longer battery life and smoother UI experience, over the slightly better quality photos.
