Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Oppo Reno8 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 July 19, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 100.87 cm³ 87.32 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 189 g 183 g
Height 159.9 mm 161.2 mm
Width 75.1 mm 74.2 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 7.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet
  • Glazed Green
  • Glazed Black
  • House of the Dragon

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 90.3 %
Pixel Density 407 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness 800 nits 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 950 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 106.51 mAh/in² 100.25 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.61 mAh/cm³ 51.54 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G610 MC6

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 14 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52 5GOppo Reno8 ProPractical Impact
Dimensions159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm161.2 × 74.2 × 7.3 mmOppo Reno8 Pro is slightly taller and thinner, potentially feeling more sleek. A52 5G is thicker, giving a more substantial feel in hand.
Weight189g183gOppo Reno8 Pro is marginally lighter, which might be noticeable during extended use, providing better comfort.
BuildNot SpecifiedNot SpecifiedWithout detailed material specifications, the exact feel and durability difference can't be determined.

Display

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52 5GOppo Reno8 ProPractical Impact
Size6.5"6.7"Oppo Reno8 Pro offers a slightly larger viewing area, better for media consumption and gaming.
Resolution1080x24001080x2412Virtually identical sharpness; pixel density difference is imperceptible.
PPI407394Similar pixel density resulting in nearly identical display clarity.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors, deep blacks, and good contrast.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth provide smooth scrolling and animations, enhancing user experience.
Brightness0 nits900 nitsOppo Reno8 Pro will be significantly better in bright outdoor conditions, much more readable under sunlight.

Performance

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52 5GOppo Reno8 ProPractical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 750G (8 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm)Oppo Reno8 Pro's chipset is more modern and efficient, offering substantially higher performance.
AnTuTu Score384,853837,000Oppo Reno8 Pro offers noticeably smoother and faster performance in all tasks, including heavy apps and gaming.
GPUAdreno 619Mali-G610 MC6Oppo Reno8 Pro has a significantly more powerful GPU, providing superior graphics rendering, especially in gaming.

Camera

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52 5GOppo Reno8 ProPractical Impact
Main Camera64MP (f/1.8, 1/1.7", 0.8µm)50MP (f/1.8, 1/1.56", 1.0µm)Samsung has higher resolution, but Oppo has a larger sensor with bigger pixels that should perform better in low light conditions, resulting in more detailed images.
Selfie Camera32MP (f/2.2, 1/2.8", 0.8µm)32MP (f/2.4, 1/2.74", 0.8µm)Samsung has slightly wider aperture for potentially better low-light selfies; Oppo has negligibly larger sensor, with the image quality being very similar.
Wide Angle Lens13MP (f/2.2, 1/3.1", 1.12µm)5MP (f/2.2)Samsung's wide-angle lens offers significantly higher resolution for landscape and group shots.
Depth Sensor5MP (f/2.4, 1.12µm)NoneSamsung has a dedicated depth sensor for portrait mode, potentially enhancing the bokeh effect.
Macro Lens5MP (f/2.4, 1.12µm)2MP (f/2.4, 1/5", 1.75µm)Samsung offers higher resolution; Oppo's larger pixel size might help in low light but the lower resolution is a disadvantage.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@30fps with EIS, 1080p@60fps with EIS, Slow-motion 120fpsUp to 4K@30fps with EIS, up to 1080p@240fps with EIS, Slow-motion 240fpsBoth phones offer similar 4K capabilities. Oppo has better slow-motion recording capabilities.
DXOMark ScoreNot Available114 (Photo: 125, Video: 111)Oppo's camera is tested to be solid with the results available.

Battery

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52 5GOppo Reno8 ProPractical Impact
Capacity4500mAh4500mAhBoth offer similar battery capacity, suggesting comparable battery life.
Charging25W Fast Charging80W Fast ChargingOppo Reno8 Pro's faster charging will significantly reduce downtime and provide much quicker top-ups.
Charging FeaturesQC2.0 and AFCNoneSamsung's charging features provide a bit more customization for their charging, although the 25W is still considerably slower than the 80W on the Oppo Reno8 Pro.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Advantages

  • Higher Resolution Wide Angle Lens: 13MP wide-angle lens captures more detail in landscape and group photos.
  • Dedicated Depth Sensor: Improves portrait mode with more accurate bokeh effects.
  • More Complete Camera System: It has a quadruple camera system, offering more variety and utility.
  • Dolby Atmos Support: Better audio quality.
  • Additional Charging Features: QC2.0 and AFC.

Practical Implications: A more versatile camera for varied photography needs and enhanced audio quality during playback for better experience.

Oppo Reno8 Pro Advantages

  • Superior Performance: The Dimensity 8100 Max chipset provides significantly faster performance for gaming and demanding applications.
  • Faster Charging: 80W charging greatly reduces charging time.
  • Brighter Display: 900 nits brightness offers better visibility in bright sunlight.
  • Newer Bluetooth Version: Supports Bluetooth 5.3 for more stability.
  • Better Satellite System Support: More accurate location tracking
  • Stereo Speakers: Clearer calls, better audio separation, and enhanced audio immersion

Practical Implications: A much smoother and more responsive experience, faster charging, a more visible display outdoors, and better audio quality during playback and calls.

Trade-offs

  • Samsung A52 5G: Trades performance and charging speed for a more versatile camera system and slightly better audio.
  • Oppo Reno8 Pro: Trades some camera versatility and features for superior performance, display brightness, charging speed, and better audio experience during calls.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Ideal User

  • Casual Photographers: Users who value a diverse camera system with a capable wide-angle lens, good portrait mode, and macro mode.
  • Multimedia Consumers: Users who value immersive audio and use their phone for media consumption.
  • Users on a Budget: Users who don't need top-tier performance and want a solid all-rounder at a lower price.
  • Users who value established brand recognition: Preferring Samsung's brand value and ecosystem.

Use Cases: Casual photography, social media sharing, moderate gaming, media consumption, and a reliable everyday phone for general use.

Oppo Reno8 Pro Ideal User

  • Gamers: Demanding users who prioritize high performance and smooth gameplay.
  • Power Users: Users who need quick app loading, fluid multitasking, and minimal lag.
  • Outdoor Users: Users who need a phone with a bright, readable display in sunny conditions.
  • Users who value fast charging: Users who want to be able to charge their phone very quickly and reduce downtime.
  • Users who want clear calls: Users who want excellent audio quality and a clear microphone for calls and meetings.

Use Cases: Gaming, heavy multitasking, video editing, outdoor navigation, conference calls, and heavy social media use.

Price-to-Value Ratio

  • Samsung Galaxy A52 5G: Offers good features for a mid-range price point, emphasizing camera versatility and brand value.
  • Oppo Reno8 Pro: Provides higher performance and fast charging for a potentially higher cost, emphasizing the overall speed and outdoor usability.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions

  1. Performance or Camera? Do you prioritize high-end performance and a faster phone, or do you need more camera versatility with options such as wide-angle and depth sensors?
  2. Charging Speed or Versatility? Do you need the convenience of super-fast charging, or would you rather have the additional QC2.0 and AFC charging features?
  3. Outdoor Visibility and Sound? Do you often use your phone in bright sunlight, or use it to call a lot? If so, the brighter display and clearer calls of the Oppo Reno8 Pro are important.

Scenario-Based Recommendations

  • Scenario 1: Casual User: If you're a casual user who primarily uses the phone for social media, photos, and video calls, and you are on a tight budget, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a good value proposition.
  • Scenario 2: Gaming & Heavy Usage: If you play a lot of demanding games, or use resource-intensive apps, and prefer a phone with superior speed, fast charging, and very good display visibility in daylight, the Oppo Reno8 Pro is the better choice, even if it costs a bit more.
  • Scenario 3: Outdoor Enthusiast: If you use your phone outdoors a lot, the brighter display of the Oppo Reno8 Pro will be much more beneficial, even if the camera has some disadvantages in terms of versatility.

My Choice

I would choose the Oppo Reno8 Pro.

While the Samsung A52 5G has a more versatile camera system on paper, the performance and display brightness of the Oppo Reno8 Pro are far superior, and would improve my user experience greatly. The much faster charging and the newer version of Bluetooth, together with the improved satellite system support would improve the phone in terms of everyday use, and the stereo speakers, paired with a better microphone would improve my call and meeting experience. For a user who values speed and practicality, the Reno8 Pro provides a more modern and enjoyable user experience, and it is the clear choice if the cost difference is not a major consideration. The Oppo Reno8 Pro offers a smoother, faster, and more responsive experience, and I value that more than some camera versatility I would rarely use.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.