1. Specifications Comparison
Design
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Honor 70 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm | 161.4 × 73.3 × 7.9 mm | Honor 70 is taller and slightly narrower, potentially feeling more comfortable for one-handed use. A52 5G is thicker, which may make it feel more substantial. |
| Weight | 189g | 178g | Honor 70 is 11g lighter, which can be noticeable during prolonged usage. |
Display
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Honor 70 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size | 6.5" | 6.67" | Honor 70 offers a slightly larger viewing area, better for media consumption and gaming. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | Both offer the same Full HD+ sharpness, providing clear visuals. |
| PPI | 407 | 395 | Very similar pixel density, meaning both have comparable sharpness and clarity. |
| Technology | AMOLED | OLED | Both use high-quality display tech, providing vibrant colours and deep blacks. |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Both offer smooth scrolling and animations. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Peak brightness is not available, making comparison impossible in this area. |
Performance
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Honor 70 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (6 nm) | Honor 70’s chipset is newer and more powerful, translating to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. |
| AnTuTu Score | 384,853 | 600,525 | Honor 70 shows a significant advantage in benchmarks, indicating better overall performance and responsiveness. |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 642L | Honor 70's more powerful GPU will provide better graphics in games and other demanding applications. |
Camera
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Honor 70 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Camera | 64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7", Sony IMX682, 0.80µm | 54MP, f/1.9, 1/1.49", Sony IMX800, 1.00µm | A52 has higher MP but Honor 70 has a larger sensor with larger pixels, which generally translates to better low-light performance and dynamic range. |
| Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8", Sony IMX616, 0.80µm | 32MP, f/2.4, 1/3.2", Omnivision OV32C, 0.70µm | A52 5G has a wider aperture and a larger sensor, possibly leading to better selfie quality. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 13MP, f/2.2, 1/3.1", Samsung S5K3L6, 1.12µm | 50MP, f/2.2 | Honor 70 has significantly higher resolution on the ultrawide lens, which can result in more detailed wide-angle shots. |
| Portrait Mode | 5MP, f/2.4 | Not Available | A52 5G has a dedicated depth sensor for better portrait effects. |
| Macro Lens | 5MP, f/2.4 | 2MP, f/2.4 | A52 5G offers a higher resolution macro lens for close-up shots. |
| Video Recording | Up to 4K@30fps with EIS | Up to 4K@30fps with EIS | Both offer similar video recording capabilities. |
| Video Stabilization | Yes (EIS) | No (EIS) | A52 5G offers video stabilization for smoother recordings. |
| Slow Motion | 120fps | 960fps | Honor 70 offers more significant slow-motion capabilities. |
| DxOMark Score | Not Available | 115 (Mobile), 115 (Photo), 129 (Video) | Honor 70 has been tested and has a reasonable DxOMark score, offering insight into its quality. A52 5G lacks a DxOMark score. |
| Camera Features | Quadruple Camera, OIS, Manual Focus | Triple Camera, Continuous Shooting, RAW | Both offer different camera features, potentially appealing to different user preferences. |
Battery
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Honor 70 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 4800mAh | Honor 70 has slightly larger battery, offering a marginal increase in battery life. |
| Charging | 25W Fast Charging | 66W Fast Charging | Honor 70's fast charging will charge the phone much quicker. |
| Features | QC2.0, AFC | Reverse Charging | Honor 70 offers the convenience of reverse charging, while A52 5G supports Quick Charge 2.0 and Adaptive Fast Charging standards. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Advantages:
- Optical Image Stabilization (OIS): Offers better image stabilization, especially useful in low-light and for videos.
- Dedicated Depth Sensor: Provides better portrait mode effects.
- Slightly Better Selfie Camera: A wider aperture and larger sensor could potentially result in better selfie quality.
- Wider Aperture on the Main Camera Can capture slightly more light.
- Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 5 for better durability.
- Manual focus option for cameras: gives control to the user.
Honor 70 Advantages:
- Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 778G+ offers significantly better CPU and GPU performance, making it faster and smoother.
- Faster Charging: 66W fast charging significantly reduces charging times.
- Larger Battery: Slightly larger capacity could mean longer battery life.
- Superior Wide Angle Camera: Higher resolution results in more detailed wide angle shots.
- Higher Slow Motion Capture: Allows for more detailed slow motion captures.
- Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers: Better overall audio quality.
- Newer Wifi Standard: Faster connection speeds and performance.
- Newer Bluetooth Version: Better overall bluetooth performance.
- Reverse Charging: Allows you to charge other devices wirelessly.
- RAW format for photos: allows more editing flexibility.
Trade-offs:
- A52 5G sacrifices performance for camera features like OIS and dedicated depth sensor.
- Honor 70 sacrifices some camera features (OIS, depth sensor) for performance and charging speed.
- The Honor 70 does not offer the screen protection information, while the A52 5G has Gorilla Glass 5.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G:
- Ideal User: Casual users who value a well-rounded camera experience with OIS and a dedicated depth sensor, prioritize screen protection, and are less concerned about top-tier performance.
- Use Cases:
- Capturing photos and videos in various conditions, where stabilization is important.
- Users who prefer the familiarity of a well-established brand (Samsung).
- Users who use their camera for a lot of portrait photos.
Honor 70:
- Ideal User: Performance-focused users, gamers, and anyone who needs a fast and responsive device with fast charging.
- Use Cases:
- Mobile gamers who want better graphics and frame rates.
- Users who multitask heavily and need a snappy phone.
- Users who frequently need to charge their phone quickly.
- Users who value high resolution wide angle photos.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions:
- Performance Needs: Do you prioritize raw performance for gaming and multitasking, or is a slightly slower but more versatile camera enough?
- Camera Priorities: Are features like OIS and a dedicated depth sensor essential, or are high resolution wide-angle shots and better low-light performance more important?
- Charging Speed: Is extremely fast charging a necessity for your daily routine?
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Frequent Traveler: If you take a lot of photos on your travels, the A52 5G could be a more versatile choice with its OIS, portrait and dedicated Macro mode.
- Scenario 2: Mobile Gamer: If you want the best gaming experience, the Honor 70 is the better choice because of the more powerful processor and GPU.
- Scenario 3: Heavy Multitasker: If you regularly switch between apps, the Honor 70's superior performance will keep things smooth.
- Scenario 4: Everyday User: If you want a good all-around experience, the A52 5G is a solid choice with good cameras and build quality, but the Honor 70 is a better all-arounder with better performance and charging speed.
What I would choose and why!
I would choose the Honor 70.
While the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has appealing features like OIS in the camera, the Honor 70 has better performance, a much faster charging speed, and a more modern processor. The better main camera sensor, higher resolution wide angle lens, and excellent slow motion make it a winner. For my typical usage, which involves multitasking, using demanding apps, and enjoying a quick charging speed the Honor 70 wins. The Honor 70 overall offers a more powerful and future-proof experience. The lack of OIS and a dedicated depth sensor are a trade-off, but the overall improvements in performance, battery and charging justify this decision.
