Samsung Galaxy A35 vs Motorola Edge 50 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 15, 2024 May 15, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 103.42 cm³ 100.31 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.16 "/g 3.4 "/g
Weight 209 g 197 g
Height 161.7 mm 161.1 mm
Width 78 mm 72.4 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Forest Grey
  • Nordic Wood

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1220 x 2712
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.8 % 92.9 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 446 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 2500 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 100.25 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.34 mAh/cm³ 44.86 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1380 (5 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Mali-G68 MP5 Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.1
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A 1.4
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.1, Gen 2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 18 17

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A35 vs. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra: Detailed Comparison

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A35Motorola Edge 50 UltraPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions161.7x78x8.2mm161.1x72.4x8.6mmThe Motorola is slightly narrower and thinner but a bit thicker overall. Negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight209g197gThe Motorola is slightly lighter, but the difference (12g) is minimal in practical use.
ColorsNavy, Iceblue, Lilac, LemonPeach Fuzz, Forest Grey, Nordic WoodPrimarily a matter of personal preference.
Display
Size6.6"6.7"Negligible difference in screen real estate.
TypeSuper AMOLED, 120HzP-OLED, 144HzBoth offer vibrant colors and smooth scrolling. The 144Hz refresh rate on the Motorola might provide a slightly smoother experience for fast-paced gaming, but the difference is subtle.
Resolution1080x23401220x2712The Motorola offers a sharper display with higher pixel density, resulting in crisper text and images.
Peak BrightnessNot specified2500 nitsThe Motorola's significantly higher peak brightness ensures excellent outdoor visibility, even in direct sunlight. The lack of this specification for the Samsung makes a direct comparison impossible.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1380 (5 nm)Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 in the Motorola is a more powerful chipset, offering significantly better performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)The Motorola's CPU architecture, featuring a faster prime core and more efficient performance cores, will result in smoother multitasking and faster app loading times.
GPUMali-G68 MP5Adreno 735The Adreno 735 in the Motorola offers superior graphics performance, leading to a better gaming experience and smoother handling of graphically intensive applications.
RAM/Storage128GB/8GB, 256GB/8GB512GB/16GBThe Motorola offers significantly more storage and RAM. The higher RAM allows for more efficient multitasking, while the larger storage accommodates more apps, photos, and videos.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh4500 mAhWhile the Samsung has a larger battery capacity, real-world battery life depends on various factors including software optimization and display usage.
Camera
Video Capabilities4K@30fps (EIS), 1080p@30/60fps (EIS)Up to 1080p@960fps (HDR, EIS), 4K@60fps (HDR, EIS)The Motorola offers more advanced video recording features, including higher frame rates and resolutions, resulting in smoother and more detailed videos. Slow-motion recording capabilities are significantly better on the Motorola.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful: The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, coupled with more RAM, provides a much smoother and faster experience.
  • Sharper and brighter display: Higher resolution and peak brightness deliver superior visual quality.
  • More advanced video recording: Offers higher frame rates and resolutions for superior video capture.
  • Larger storage: 512GB provides ample space for apps and media.

Samsung Galaxy A35 Advantages:

  • Potentially longer battery life: The larger battery capacity might translate to longer usage time, although this depends on real-world usage patterns.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a high-quality display, and advanced camera features. Suitable for demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, and multitasking.

Samsung Galaxy A35: Suitable for users who prioritize battery life and affordability. Best for everyday tasks like web browsing, social media, and light gaming.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? While both are mid-range, the Motorola likely commands a higher price due to its superior specs.
  2. What are your primary use cases? For demanding tasks, the Motorola is clearly superior. For basic usage with a focus on battery life, the Samsung might suffice.
  3. How important is display quality and camera performance? The Motorola offers a noticeable advantage in both areas.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy gamer: Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
  • Casual user on a budget: Samsung Galaxy A35
  • Photographer/Videographer: Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
  • User who needs long battery life: Further investigation is needed to determine real-world battery performance as specifications alone are insufficient. The Samsung has a larger battery capacity, but the Motorola's more efficient processor might offset this.
Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.