1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A32 | Motorola Moto G35 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 158.9 × 73.6 × 8.4 mm | 166.3 × 76 × 7.8 mm | Moto G35 is taller and wider, A32 is thicker. Affects hand feel and pocketability. |
| Weight | 184g | 188g | Virtually the same, minimal impact on portability. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.4" | 6.72" | Moto G35 has a larger screen for more immersive media consumption and gaming. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | Both offer the same level of sharpness. |
| Pixel Density | 411 PPI | 392 PPI | A32 is slightly sharper, but difference is subtle to the naked eye. |
| Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | A32 has superior contrast, deeper blacks, and vibrant colours, better for media consumption in low light. |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 120Hz | Moto G35 has smoother scrolling and animations. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 1000 nits | Moto G35 is significantly better for outdoor visibility in bright sunlight. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 (12 nm) | Unisoc T760 (6 nm) | Moto G35 has a more efficient and powerful chip for faster apps and better multitasking. |
| AnTuTu Score | 200,458 | 423,297 | Moto G35 is significantly faster in benchmarks, translating to better real-world performance. |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP4 | Moto G35 has a superior GPU, better for gaming. |
| Camera | |||
| Main Camera Res. | 64.2MP | 50MP | A32 has higher resolution, potentially capturing more detail, but is not the only determining factor. |
| Main Camera Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 | Both have similar low light capabilities. |
| Main Camera Sensor Size | Unknown | 1/2.76" | Moto G35 has a known sensor size, indicating that the lens size is smaller. |
| Main Camera Pixel Size | Unknown | 0.64 µm | Moto G35’s known pixel size is smaller which may indicate slightly less light captured per pixel. |
| Selfie Camera Res. | 20MP | 16MP | A32 has higher selfie resolution for potentially more detailed selfies. |
| Selfie Camera Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.45 | A32 has a wider aperture for better low-light selfies. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 8MP, f/2.2 | 8MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm pixel size | Both have similar wide-angle capabilities. Moto G35 has a known pixel size indicating bigger pixels. |
| Portrait Mode | Yes, 5MP | No | A32 can capture portrait photos with depth effect. |
| Macro Lens | Yes, 5MP | No | A32 can capture close-up macro shots. |
| Video Recording | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | Moto G35 can record higher resolution videos for higher quality footage. |
| Slow-motion | No | Yes, 120fps | Moto G35 can record smoother slow-motion videos. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Both have similar battery life. |
| Charging | Standard | 18W Fast Charging | Moto G35 charges faster, reducing downtime. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11 (max 13) | Android 14 | Moto G35 has a more recent OS, potentially with improved features and security. |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | 802.11ac | 802.11ac | Both offer similar wifi capabilities. |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 LE | A32 has more Bluetooth features for wider compatibility. Moto G35 has a more energy-efficient version. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo | Moto G35 has more location accuracy due to additional QZSS support. |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano SIM + Nano SIM) | Dual SIM (Nano SIM + eSIM) | Moto G35 supports eSIM, convenient for switching between carriers. A32 supports two SIMs simultaneously. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 64/128 GB | 128/256 GB | Moto G35 offers more storage, more flexibility for storing media. |
| RAM | 4/6/8 GB | 4/8 GB | Both have similar RAM options for multitasking. |
| Expandable | No | No | Neither supports external storage. |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | Basic audio features | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 2 mics | Moto G35 has enhanced audio experience, better for music/video playback and calls. |
| Security | |||
| Fingerprint Sensor | Basic | Side-mounted | Moto G35 has a more modern and faster fingerprint sensor. |
| Build | |||
| Screen Protection | Unknown | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Moto G35 has better scratch resistance. |
| Sensors | |||
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Proximity, Fingerprint, Hall, Geomagnetic | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Proximity, Fingerprint | A32 has hall sensor and geomagnetic sensor. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A32 Advantages:
- Superior Display Technology: AMOLED screen provides richer colours, better contrast, and deeper blacks, resulting in a more visually appealing experience, especially for viewing HDR content.
- More Camera Features: Includes dedicated macro and depth sensors, offering more versatility in photography, especially for close-up and portrait shots.
- Wider Bluetooth Support: Supports a wider range of bluetooth profiles for greater compatibility with peripherals.
- Additional sensors: Includes Hall and Geomagnetic sensors.
Motorola Moto G35 Advantages:
- Significantly Faster Performance: The Unisoc T760 chipset is much more powerful than the Helio G80, resulting in faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming capabilities.
- Brighter Display: The 1000 nits brightness makes it much more usable outdoors in direct sunlight.
- Higher Refresh Rate: 120Hz refresh rate offers smoother scrolling and animations, resulting in a more fluid user experience.
- Better Video Recording: Can record 4K videos at 30fps, offering higher quality videos. Has slow-motion video recording capabilities.
- Faster Charging: 18W fast charging reduces downtime.
- More Storage Options: Offers a 256GB variant, allowing for more space for photos, videos, and apps.
- More Recent Software: Comes with Android 14, the current latest version.
- Enhanced Audio: Features Dolby Atmos, stereo speakers and dual microphones for better audio quality.
- Better Screen Protection: Features Corning Gorilla Glass 3 for scratch resistance.
- eSIM Support: Offers eSIM support, convenient for switching between carriers.
- More accurate GPS: Includes QZSS satellite support for more accurate location tracking
Trade-offs:
- A32 Trade-off: The A32’s performance is notably inferior to the Moto G35 which can lead to a less responsive experience overall. It also features an inferior screen technology when compared to the Moto G35's higher screen brightness.
- Moto G35 Trade-off: Lacks dedicated macro and depth sensors, which may limit creative photography. Has less bluetooth profiles.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A32 Ideal User:
- Casual users who prioritize display quality and image quality over performance.
- Users who enjoy mobile photography with macro and portrait photography.
- Users who value traditional physical SIMs.
Use Cases:
- Social media browsing and content consumption: The AMOLED screen is great for watching videos and looking at photos.
- Casual photography: Users who want good photos for social media.
- Basic multitasking: Suitable for everyday apps like social media, email, and browsing.
Motorola Moto G35 Ideal User:
- Users who value performance and speed.
- Users who need a phone for outdoor use.
- Users who enjoy mobile gaming.
- Users who value up to date software and security.
- Users who are looking for a great audio experience.
Use Cases:
- Gaming: The powerful chipset and GPU ensure smooth gameplay.
- Media Consumption in bright environments: High brightness display is great for outdoors.
- Multitasking: Can handle multiple apps running simultaneously without lag.
- Content creation: Great for recording high-quality 4K videos.
- Frequent GPS Navigation: Improved GPS accuracy.
- International travelers: eSIM is useful for international travel.
Price-to-Value Ratio:
- The Moto G35 generally offers a better price-to-performance ratio due to its better processing power, faster charging, brighter screen, and better video capabilities. The trade off being that it lacks some extra camera features.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- Do you prioritize display quality and creative photography or speed, brightness, and modern features? (A32 excels at the former, Moto G35 at the latter.)
- How important is gaming and multitasking to you? (Moto G35 is better for heavier tasks.)
- Do you need eSIM support or the latest Android OS? (Moto G35 has a clear advantage)
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: User wants a phone mainly for casual media consumption and enjoys photography - the Samsung Galaxy A32 may be a better choice due to its AMOLED display and extra camera features.
- Scenario 2: User needs a phone for gaming, outdoor use and faster everyday performance - the Motorola Moto G35 is a better fit due to its faster processor, higher refresh rate, brighter display, and overall more up-to-date feature set.
- Scenario 3: User needs a phone with up to date software for a long time - the Motorola Moto G35 is a better choice due to the more recent Android version.
- Scenario 4: User needs a phone that is a balance between price, performance and features, the Motorola Moto G35 is a better choice.
My Choice
I would choose the Motorola Moto G35. While I appreciate the AMOLED display of the Samsung Galaxy A32, the significantly better performance of the Moto G35's chipset, its higher screen brightness, 120Hz refresh rate, 4K video recording, and faster charging are more important to me for daily use. I find myself needing a reliable phone that performs quickly and provides a fluid experience, and I appreciate the future proofing that a more recent Android version provides, along with the convenience of an eSIM slot and modern fingerprint sensor.
