Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Oppo Reno8 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 22, 2021 July 19, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 113.71 cm³ 87.32 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.17 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 205 g 183 g
Height 164.2 mm 161.2 mm
Width 76.1 mm 74.2 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 7.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet
  • Glazed Green
  • Glazed Black
  • House of the Dragon

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.7 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.6 % 90.3 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 950 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 100.25 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.97 mAh/cm³ 51.54 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC3 Mali-G610 MC6

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 13 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a detailed comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G and Oppo Reno8 Pro, focusing on their practical implications:

Design

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GOppo Reno8 ProPractical Impact
Dimensions164.2 × 76.1 × 9.1 mm161.2 × 74.2 × 7.3 mmOppo Reno8 Pro is more compact and thinner, likely more comfortable in hand and pocket. The A32 5G is larger and bulkier.
Weight205g183gOppo Reno8 Pro is noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use. The A32 5G is heavier.

Display

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GOppo Reno8 ProPractical Impact
Size6.5"6.7"Oppo Reno8 Pro has a slightly larger display, offering a more immersive viewing experience for media consumption and gaming.
Resolution720x16001080x2412Oppo Reno8 Pro has a significantly sharper display with more detail for text, images, and videos. The A32 5G might appear pixelated.
Pixel Density (PPI)270394Oppo Reno8 Pro has a considerably sharper display with much less visible pixelation; better for reading and high detail.
TechnologyTFT LCDAMOLEDOppo Reno8 Pro offers superior color vibrancy, deeper blacks, and better viewing angles, as well as better power efficiency in dark mode.
Refresh Rate60Hz120HzOppo Reno8 Pro has much smoother scrolling and animations, and feels more responsive. The A32 5G can appear laggy by comparison.
Brightness0 nits900 nitsOppo Reno8 Pro is much more usable in bright sunlight with significantly higher brightness for better outdoor visibility; The A32 5G is likely unreadable outdoors.

Performance

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GOppo Reno8 ProPractical Impact
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm)Oppo Reno8 Pro has a more powerful and efficient chipset for faster performance in all tasks, including gaming. The A32 5G is much slower and less power efficient.
AnTuTu Score249,720837,000Oppo Reno8 Pro provides significantly smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and far better gaming performance; The A32 5G is much slower.
GPUMali-G57 MC3 (ARM Mali-G57)Mali-G610 MC6 (Mali-G610 MC6)Oppo Reno8 Pro has a more powerful GPU, better for graphically intensive tasks and gaming. The A32 5G can struggle with demanding 3D games.

Battery

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GOppo Reno8 ProPractical Impact
Capacity5000mAh4500mAhSamsung Galaxy A32 5G has a larger battery, potentially offering longer battery life between charges. However, this is affected by other components like display type.
Charging15W fast charging80W fast chargingOppo Reno8 Pro charges much faster, allowing for quicker top-ups and less downtime. The A32 5G is significantly slower to charge.

Camera

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GOppo Reno8 ProPractical Impact
Main Camera48MP, f/1.8, 1/2", 0.80µm50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56", 1.00µmOppo Reno8 Pro likely captures more detailed and better low-light photos due to larger sensor and pixels. The A32 5G's camera is less capable.
Selfie Camera13MP, f/2.232MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74", 0.80µmOppo Reno8 Pro has a much higher resolution for sharper and more detailed selfies. The A32 5G's selfie camera is lower quality.
Wide Angle Lens8MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm5MP, f/2.2Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has a higher resolution ultrawide lens. However, sensor quality is unknown.
Depth Sensor2MP, f/2.4NoneSamsung Galaxy A32 5G has a dedicated depth sensor for portrait mode, The Oppo Reno8 Pro likely uses software for this.
Macro Lens5MP, f/2.42MP, f/2.4, 1/5", 1.75µmSamsung Galaxy A32 5G has a slightly higher resolution, however sensor quality is unknown. The Reno8 Pro has a higher quality sensor but lower resolution.
Video Recording4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 1080p@120fps4K@30fps with EIS, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@960fps with EISOppo Reno8 Pro offers more versatile video recording capabilities and video stabilization. Both record in 4K.
DXOMark ScoreNot AvailablePhoto: 125, Video: 111, Main: 114Oppo Reno8 Pro has been rated by DxOMark, offering insights into its camera performance. The A32 5G has no such rating

Software

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GOppo Reno8 ProPractical Impact
OSAndroid 11 (upgradable to 13)Android 12 (upgradable to 14)Oppo Reno8 Pro has newer Android version out of the box and likely to receive future Android updates for longer.

Connectivity

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GOppo Reno8 ProPractical Impact
Wi-Fi802.11a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band, Hotspot, Direct, Display802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax (WiFi 6), Dual Band, Hotspot, Direct, Display, MiMOOppo Reno8 Pro has faster and more efficient Wi-Fi 6, better for high-bandwidth activities. The A32 5G has older wifi standards and will be slower.
Bluetooth5.1 LE, A2DP, EDR, HID, LE5.3 LE, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX, LDAC, SBC, AACOppo Reno8 Pro has the latest Bluetooth for better audio quality and more power efficient. The A32 5G is slightly older version of Bluetooth.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, GPS (L1+L5), BeiDou (B1), Galileo (E1+E5a), BeiDou (B2)Oppo Reno8 Pro has more precise GPS, especially in urban environments.

Storage

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GOppo Reno8 ProPractical Impact
Internal64GB or 128GB128GB or 256GBOppo Reno8 Pro has larger storage options, providing more space for apps, media, and files. The A32 5G can run out of space.
RAM4GB, 6GB, or 8GB8GB or 12GBOppo Reno8 Pro has more RAM, ensuring smoother multitasking and app performance, especially with multiple apps and browser tabs open. The A32 5G may struggle with heavy usage.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone has expandable storage; users should consider this when choosing between available variants.

Audio

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GOppo Reno8 ProPractical Impact
QualityDolby Atmos, Dolby Digital PlusNoise cancellation mic, Stereo SpeakersOppo Reno8 Pro has better overall audio quality with stereo speakers for immersion and clearer calls via noise cancellation. The A32 5G offers an alternative approach with Dolby enhancements, but lacks stereo speakers.

Security

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GOppo Reno8 ProPractical Impact
Fingerprint Sensorside-mountedbasic fingerprint sensorBoth phones provide secure biometric options via fingerprint sensors. The side-mounted implementation on the A32 5G is a more modern and practical approach.

Build Quality

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GOppo Reno8 ProPractical Impact
Screen ProtectionUnknownCorning Gorilla Glass 5Oppo Reno8 Pro's screen is more resistant to scratches and impacts, adding to the device's durability. The A32 5G screen protection is unknown, so may be more susceptible to damage.

Sensors

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GOppo Reno8 ProPractical Impact
SensorsFingerprint, Proximity, AccelerometerFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, GyroscopeThe Reno8 Pro features a Gyroscope for more accurate motion tracking which enhances gaming and other applications that need motion detection, this is missing on the A32 5G.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G Advantages:

  • Larger Battery: The 5000mAh battery provides potentially longer battery life for users who prioritize endurance.
  • Wider Ultra-wide Camera: The 8MP ultrawide lens offers more detailed wide angle shots than the Reno8 Pro's 5MP ultrawide lens.
  • Dedicated depth sensor: The 2MP depth sensor adds hardware depth sensing to portrait photos, while the Reno8 Pro is using software.

Oppo Reno8 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED, higher resolution, pixel density, 120Hz refresh rate, and significantly higher brightness offers a vastly superior visual experience, especially in outdoor conditions.
  • Significantly Higher Performance: The Dimensity 8100 Max chipset and higher RAM provide much better performance for gaming and heavy tasks, this is reflected in benchmark scores.
  • Faster Charging: 80W fast charging allows for much quicker battery top-ups, minimizing downtime.
  • Better Main Camera: Larger sensor and pixel size results in higher quality photos, especially in low-light. The A32 5G uses an older lower quality sensor.
  • Much Better Selfie Camera: High resolution and newer sensor for more detailed and brighter selfies.
  • Newer Software & Connectivity: Runs on a newer Android version, Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.3 offers improved connectivity and future support.
  • Advanced Audio Features: Stereo speakers and a noise cancellation microphone result in a better audio experience.
  • Superior Build Quality: Corning Gorilla Glass 5 provides better protection for the screen from scratches and impacts.
  • Gyroscope: More advanced sensor features allow for enhanced motion and gaming features.
  • More Storage & RAM: Provides more space for apps and media, and smoother performance when multitasking.

Trade-offs:

  • Battery vs. Charging: The A32 5G has a larger battery but much slower charging, while the Reno8 Pro has a slightly smaller battery but charges much faster.
  • Camera Versatility vs. Quality: The A32 5G offers a dedicated depth sensor, while the Reno8 Pro features a higher quality main camera.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life over performance and display quality. Users who require a dedicated depth sensor, and a wide angle lens.
  • Use Cases: Basic tasks, web browsing, casual social media, and a phone for long usage days. This phone is better suited for undemanding users.
  • Price-to-Value: Offers reasonable value at a lower price point, but users should be aware of its performance limitations.

Oppo Reno8 Pro:

  • Ideal User: Users who prioritize performance, display quality, camera capabilities, and a premium experience. Best for users who like gaming, media consumption, social media, and taking high quality photos.
  • Use Cases: Gaming, photography, video recording, media consumption, demanding apps, and users who appreciate fast charging and want high performance.
  • Price-to-Value: Justifies its higher price with its significantly better features, offering great value in the upper-midrange category.

4. Decision Framework

Here are three key questions for potential buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The A32 5G is cheaper and is more budget-friendly, while the Reno8 Pro is a more significant investment.
  2. What are your primary use cases? If you prioritize heavy gaming, photography, and high quality media consumption, the Reno8 Pro is a much better choice. If you primarily browse social media and need longer battery life, the A32 5G may be sufficient.
  3. How important is display quality and performance? The Reno8 Pro's AMOLED screen, 120Hz refresh rate, and powerful chipset make it vastly superior, while the A32 5G's display is quite poor in comparison.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Basic User: If you just need a phone for calls, texts, and casual browsing, the A32 5G can be adequate.
  • Scenario 2: Media Enthusiast: If you consume a lot of videos, play games, or care about the quality of photos and videos, the Oppo Reno8 Pro is the better choice.
  • Scenario 3: Power User: If you need a phone for heavy multitasking, gaming, or demanding applications, the Oppo Reno8 Pro's higher performance and RAM are crucial.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would pick the Oppo Reno8 Pro.

Here's why:

  • Superior User Experience: The AMOLED display with 120Hz refresh rate, the significantly faster chipset, and the fast charging make for a much more enjoyable and responsive daily user experience. The A32 5G would simply feel sluggish in comparison with a low quality display and an unreliable experience.
  • Future-Proofing: The Reno8 Pro's powerful processor, ample RAM, and newer software/connectivity standards ensure that the device remains usable for a longer period. The A32 5G is using an old processor that would become slow quickly with software updates.
  • Better Multimedia Capabilities: The combination of the high-quality camera, stereo speakers, and bright display make the Reno8 Pro a much better choice for photography, video, and media consumption.
  • Value for Money: Despite the higher price, the Oppo Reno8 Pro's superior features and performance justify the investment. The A32 5G is not a great phone, even for its budget price.

While the A32 5G might offer a slightly longer battery life, the significantly better display, performance, camera, and charging speed of the Reno8 Pro makes it the clear winner for me, even if it means sacrificing some battery capacity. The Reno8 Pro offers far more value and a better long term experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.