1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | Motorola Moto G35 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Launch Date | 2021-01-22 | 2024-09-25 | Motorola is significantly newer, likely with more recent software and features. |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 76.1 x 9.1 mm, 205g | 166.3 x 76 x 7.8 mm, 188g | Moto G35 is taller but thinner and lighter, potentially more comfortable for extended use. A32 5G feels more bulky and heavier. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.5" | 6.72" | Moto G35 offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive viewing and content consumption. |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2400 | Moto G35 has a significantly sharper display, with more detail for text, images, and video. |
| Pixel Density | 270 PPI | 392 PPI | Moto G35 screen will look clearer with less pixelation |
| Technology | TFT LCD | IPS LCD | Moto G35 offers better color reproduction and viewing angles. |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 120Hz | Moto G35 display will appear much smoother during scrolling and animations. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 1000 nits | Moto G35 screen will be significantly easier to see outdoors and in bright conditions. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) | Unisoc T760 (6 nm) | Moto G35 chipset is more modern and offers higher performance. |
| AnTuTu Score | 249,720 | 423,297 | Moto G35 offers much faster performance, smoother app loading, and better multitasking and gaming experience. |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 (ARM Mali-G57) | Mali-G57 (ARM Mali-G57 MP4) | Moto G35 GPU is likely faster, leading to better graphics performance in games and apps. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Similar battery life is expected, depending on usage. |
| Charging | 15W fast charging | 18W fast charging | Moto G35 charges slightly faster, reducing downtime. |
| Camera | |||
| Main Camera | 48MP, f/1.8, 1/2" sensor | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76" sensor | Moto G35 has higher resolution, Samsung has bigger sensor size that gathers more light. Image quality will likely be similar in daylight, but samsung might have the edge in lowlight. |
| Selfie Camera | 13MP, f/2.2 | 16MP, f/2.45 | Moto G35 offers higher resolution, Samsung offers slightly better lowlight performance due to a wider aperture. |
| Wide Angle | 8MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm pixel size | 8MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm pixel size | Comparable wide-angle camera performance. |
| Depth Camera | 2MP, f/2.4 | None | Samsung A32 has a dedicated depth sensor which may offer better bokeh in portrait mode. |
| Macro Camera | 5MP, f/2.4 | None | Samsung A32 has a dedicated macro lens which may offer better closeup photos. |
| Video Recording | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | Both offer similar quality video recording capabilities. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11 (up to 13) | Android 14 | Moto G35 comes with a newer version of Android, ensuring better security and newer features. It is uncertain for how long Moto G35 will receive updates. |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | 802.11ac | 802.11ac | Similar Wi-Fi performance for both phones. |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 LE | 5.0 LE | Samsung A32 has slightly newer Bluetooth version with better range and efficiency. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo | Moto G35 is slightly more accurate with more navigation systems. |
| SIM | Dual Nano SIM | Dual Nano SIM + eSIM | Moto G35 offers an eSIM which may be preferred by frequent travelers. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 64/128 GB | 128/256 GB | Moto G35 has higher internal storage options. |
| RAM | 4/6/8 GB | 4/8 GB | Sufficient for most use cases on both devices, 8 GB is better for more demanding apps and multitasking. |
| Expandable | No | No | Neither phone allows for storage expansion with a microSD card. |
| Audio | |||
| Audio | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphones | Moto G35 offers potentially better audio quality thanks to stereo speakers. |
| Security | |||
| Security | Side-mounted fingerprint | Side-mounted fingerprint | Standard fingerprint unlocking on both devices |
| Build Quality | |||
| Screen Protection | Unknown | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Moto G35 screen is more resistant to scratches and damages. |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Proximity, Fingerprint | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Proximity, Fingerprint | Moto G35 comes with additional compass and gyroscope sensors that are good for augmented reality or games that uses this sensors. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G Advantages:
- Slightly larger main camera sensor: The 1/2" sensor may perform better in low light.
- Dedicated Depth and Macro Lenses: Offers more flexibility for close-up shots and portrait photography.
- Wider aperture selfie camera: May perform slightly better in low-light situations.
- Slightly newer Bluetooth version: Might offer better connectivity with Bluetooth devices.
- Dolby Digital Plus: May have an edge in audio experience over some external speakers or headphones that support this technology.
Motorola Moto G35 Advantages:
- Newer and more powerful chipset: Significantly better performance in apps and gaming.
- Higher resolution, sharper, and brighter display: Noticeably better viewing experience, especially outdoors.
- Faster display refresh rate (120Hz): Smoother scrolling and animations.
- Newer Android OS (Android 14): Ensures more up-to-date features and security.
- Better Screen Protection: Protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 3
- eSIM support: Allows for easy carrier switching for travelers.
- Higher Storage Options: Offers more storage for media and apps.
- Stereo speakers: Improved audio experience, especially for media consumption.
- Comprehensive sensor suite: Includes Compass and Gyroscope, which is useful for many apps and games.
- Faster Charging: Less time spent charging the phone.
- Lighter and Thinner: More comfortable for prolonged usage.
Significant Trade-offs:
- Samsung A32 5G trades superior display, performance, and some connectivity features for slightly more versatile camera features with dedicated Macro and Depth sensors.
- Motorola G35 sacrifices dedicated macro and depth cameras for substantially improved display and overall performance.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Ideal User for Samsung Galaxy A32 5G:
- Casual Photographers: Users who want versatile camera setup with dedicated macro and depth lenses for specific use cases.
- Users on a tighter budget: May be a budget-friendly option if the price is significantly lower than Moto G35 and if camera features are a priority over other features.
Use Cases:
- Taking close-up pictures of objects or nature using macro lens.
- Portrait photography with background blur.
- Basic daily usage with an emphasis on media consumption and photography.
Ideal User for Motorola Moto G35:
- Performance-focused users: Those who value smooth performance, especially for gaming or multitasking.
- Frequent media consumers: Users who prefer better screen for watching videos, browsing, and social media.
- Users who need long-lasting battery: Those who use their phones often and need a device that can last all day.
- Frequent travelers: Benefit from eSIM support for easy carrier switching.
- Gamers: The Gyroscope, a more modern chipset and a high refresh rate screen provides better mobile gaming experience.
Use Cases:
- Playing demanding mobile games.
- Watching videos and browsing social media for extended periods.
- Using the device outdoors in bright conditions.
- Using the device for navigation and other tasks.
- Utilizing its stereo speakers for media consumption.
Price-to-Value:
- The Moto G35 likely offers a better price-to-value ratio due to its much more modern features. However, if camera features are an absolute priority, then Samsung A32 5G may still be relevant, only if available at a discounted price.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- How important is display quality? (Higher resolution, brightness, and refresh rate on Moto G35 significantly enhance the viewing experience.)
- How much do you value performance for gaming and multitasking? (Moto G35 offers a significantly more powerful chipset.)
- Do you need specific camera features such as macro and depth sensors? (Samsung A32 has a more versatile camera system with dedicated macro and depth lenses.)
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- If you prioritize performance, display quality, and long-term software support, the Motorola Moto G35 is the clear choice.
- If you are on a very tight budget and prioritize camera features over display and performance, and don't mind older software, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G might be considered, if it is significantly cheaper.
- If you are a casual user, both phones are adequate, but the Motorola Moto G35 still provides a smoother and overall more enjoyable experience because of its superior screen, performance and overall modern features.
My Choice:
I would choose the Motorola Moto G35. The much more modern chipset, the superior 120Hz display with higher resolution, brightness, and refresh rate, the newer Android 14 OS, and the extra features like eSIM support and stereo speakers make it a much better overall experience. The trade-off of the missing depth and macro sensors on the Moto G35 camera is worth it in my opinion, because the improved performance and display, along with a more up-to-date Android experience, will be much more noticeable in daily usage. Unless there is a very specific need for the macro and depth sensors, or the A32 5G is priced at a much lower price point, the Moto G35 represents a much better value overall.
