Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 22, 2021 September 4, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 113.71 cm³ 118.89 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.17 "/g 3.11 "/g
Weight 205 g 257 g
Height 164.2 mm 155.2 mm
Width 76.1 mm 150.2 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 5.1 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet
  • Obsidian
  • Porcelain

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 8 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 2076 x 2152
Aspect Ratio 20:9 16:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.6 % 88.5 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 373 PPI
Refresh Rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1600 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 2700 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 72.66 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.97 mAh/cm³ 39.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4650 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) Google Tensor G4 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Mali-G57 MC3 Mali-G715 MC7

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.2

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 13 21

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GGoogle Pixel 9 Pro FoldPractical Impact
Design
Form FactorStandardFoldableThe Pixel 9 Pro Fold offers a larger screen that can be folded for better portability, while the A32 5G is a standard smartphone.
Dimensions164.2 × 76.1 × 9.1 mm155.2 × 150.2 × 5.1 mmA32 5G is taller and thicker, while the Pixel 9 Pro Fold is wider when unfolded and thinner. Pixel Fold offers a large screen experience when unfolded and compact form when folded.
Weight205g257gThe A32 5G is lighter and easier to hold for extended periods, while the Pixel 9 Pro Fold is heavier due to its foldable design.
Display
Size6.5"8"The Pixel 9 Pro Fold provides a significantly larger display, offering a more immersive experience for media consumption and multitasking.
Resolution720x16002076x2152The Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a much sharper display, offering crisper visuals and text compared to the A32 5G, which has a lower resolution.
PPI270373The higher pixel density on the Pixel 9 Pro Fold leads to a sharper and more detailed display compared to the A32 5G, resulting in a noticeably clearer picture.
TechnologyTFT LCDThe A32 5G uses TFT LCD technology; the display technology on the Pixel 9 Pro Fold is not specified, making it impossible to determine which has the better display technology.
Refresh Rate60Hz120HzThe Pixel 9 Pro Fold's 120Hz refresh rate offers smoother scrolling and animations compared to the A32 5G's 60Hz refresh rate, resulting in a more responsive and fluid user experience.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth phones have identical peak brightness. This makes it impossible to determine which phone has better outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm)Google Tensor G4 (4 nm)The Pixel 9 Pro Fold's newer chipset (4nm) offers significantly faster processing and improved efficiency compared to the A32 5G's chipset (7nm). This translates into faster app loading and smoother multitasking.
Antutu Score249,7201,140,000The Pixel 9 Pro Fold exhibits significantly superior performance for gaming and demanding applications, with more future-proof performance compared to the A32 5G.
GPUMali-G57 MC3Mali-G715 MC7The Pixel 9 Pro Fold's GPU provides better graphics performance, leading to smoother gaming experience with more complex graphics, compared to the A32 5G.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh4650mAhThe A32 5G has a slightly larger battery, potentially offering marginally longer battery life than the Pixel 9 Pro Fold, although real-world use may vary depending on usage patterns.
Charging15W fast charging27W fast chargingThe Pixel 9 Pro Fold has faster charging capability, reducing the time needed to recharge the device.
FeaturesNon-removableNon-removable, 7.5W wireless chargingPixel 9 Pro Fold supports wireless charging, which can be more convenient, while both phones have non-removable batteries.
Camera
Main Camera48MP, f/1.848MP, f/1.7The Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a slightly wider aperture, which could result in slightly better low-light performance.
Selfie Camera13MP, f/2.210MP, f/2.2The A32 5G has a slightly higher megapixel count for the selfie camera, potentially resulting in slightly more detailed selfies, while both share the same aperture.
TelephotoNot Present10.8MP, f/3.0The Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a dedicated telephoto lens, providing optical zoom capabilities and superior zoomed photos, absent in the A32 5G.
Wide Angle8MP, f/2.210.5MP, f/2.2The Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a slightly higher megapixel count, potentially resulting in slightly more detailed wide-angle photos compared to A32 5G, which share the same aperture.
Portrait Mode (depth)2MP, f/2.4Not PresentThe A32 5G has a dedicated depth sensor for improved portrait mode photos which lacks in the Pixel 9 Pro Fold.
Macro lens5MP, f/2.4Not PresentThe A32 5G has a dedicated macro lens for close-up shots which lacks in the Pixel 9 Pro Fold.
Video Recording4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fpsUp to 4K@60fps with HDR, OIS, EISThe Pixel 9 Pro Fold offers more advanced video recording features like HDR, OIS, EIS, and higher frame rates, resulting in better video quality, especially in varying lighting conditions.
DxOMark ScoreNot Tested141 (Mobile)The Pixel 9 Pro Fold has been tested and received a score of 141 on DxOMark, indicating that it can be ranked for photo and video quality while A32 5G has not.
Software
OSAndroid 11 (max 13)Android 14 (max 21)The Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a newer version of Android, offering access to newer features, better security, and performance improvements compared to the A32 5G.
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6EThe Pixel 9 Pro Fold supports faster Wi-Fi speeds and is more reliable in crowded networks with support of 6E and WiFi MiMO.
BluetoothBluetooth 5.1 LEBluetooth 5.3 LEThe Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a newer Bluetooth version for better power efficiency, connection stability and supports additional audio codecs.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, NavIC, GNSSThe Pixel 9 Pro Fold has support for more satellite systems leading to more accurate positioning in more locations.
SIMDual Nano SIMDual Nano SIM + eSIMPixel 9 Pro Fold supports eSIM allowing for more flexible connectivity plans; A32 5G supports two physical SIMs simultaneously.
Storage
Internal64/128GB256/512GBThe Pixel 9 Pro Fold provides significantly more storage for apps, photos, and media, while the A32 5G has less.
RAM4/6/8GB16GBThe Pixel 9 Pro Fold has much more RAM for smoother multitasking and better performance in demanding applications than the A32 5G.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone offers expandable storage, so users are limited to the onboard storage for each device.
Audio
QualityDolby Atmos, Dolby Digital PlusNoise cancellation microphone, Stereo Speakers, 3 microphonesPixel 9 Pro Fold has better audio quality during calls and for media; while A32 5G offers audio enhancements with Dolby technology.
Security
FeaturesSide-mounted fingerprintSide-mounted fingerprintBoth phones provide biometric security with a fingerprint sensor.
Build Quality
ProtectionUnknownCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2The Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a superior glass protection of the screen than the A32 5G.
Sensors
SensorsFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, GeomagneticFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Barometer, Hall, MagnetometerThe Pixel 9 Pro Fold offers a more comprehensive suite of sensors for advanced functionality such as accurate orientation and environmental data, while the A32 5G has basic sensors.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G Advantages:

  • Lighter and More Compact: The A32 5G is significantly lighter (205g vs 257g) and has a more compact form, making it more comfortable for one-handed use and portability.
  • Larger Battery: It has a slightly larger battery (5000mAh vs 4650mAh), potentially leading to slightly longer battery life, although this may be minor.
  • Dedicated Portrait and Macro lenses: It has dedicated 2MP Portrait and 5MP macro lens for specialized photo capabilities, something which is lacking in the Pixel 9 Pro Fold.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Advantages:

  • Foldable Display: Its foldable design offers a significantly larger display (8" vs 6.5") when unfolded, which is ideal for media consumption, multitasking, and gaming and transforms into a more compact form when folded.
  • Superior Performance: The Tensor G4 chipset and more RAM result in significantly better performance, smoother multitasking, and better gaming.
  • Significantly Better Display: The Pixel Fold has a much higher resolution, pixel density, and refresh rate resulting in much sharper, smoother images compared to A32 5G.
  • More Advanced Camera System: Includes a telephoto lens for better zoom, better video recording with OIS/EIS and a significantly better main sensor.
  • Faster Charging and Wireless Charging: The Pixel 9 Pro Fold has faster charging speed and supports wireless charging, which offers greater convenience.
  • Newer Software: The Pixel 9 Pro Fold runs on a newer Android version (14 vs 11) with a promise of more updates and better feature availability.
  • Better Connectivity: Supports newer Wi-Fi standards and Bluetooth versions, leading to better speeds, reliability, and audio quality and has a more accurate GPS.
  • More Storage: Offers much higher storage capacities (256/512 GB vs 64/128 GB) and more RAM (16 GB vs 4/6/8 GB).
  • Better Build Quality: Has a superior glass protection on screen.
  • Superior Audio: Offers better audio quality during calls and for media with noise cancellation microphones, and stereo speakers

Trade-offs:

  • The Pixel 9 Pro Fold is much heavier and more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G. It also lacks the dedicated portrait and macro lenses offered by A32 5G.
  • The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has weaker performance, a lower-resolution screen, and a less versatile camera setup compared to the Pixel 9 Pro Fold.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic smartphone functionality, a lightweight design, and a longer-lasting battery. Great for basic social media, browsing, calls, and light gaming. Ideal for users who prefer a standard smartphone design.
  • Use Cases:
    • Everyday communication and browsing
    • Basic photography and social media sharing
    • Users who require a more compact and lighter device.
    • Users who are on a tight budget.
    • Users who require dedicated portrait and macro lenses.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold:

  • Ideal User: Power users, professionals, and tech enthusiasts who want the best performance, a large and versatile display, and high-end photography capabilities. Ideal for those who value cutting-edge tech and are willing to pay a premium for it. Great for multitasking, gaming, and media consumption.
  • Use Cases:
    • Multitasking on a large screen for productivity tasks
    • High-fidelity gaming with complex graphics
    • Professional photography and videography.
    • Mobile content creators and media consumption enthusiasts.
    • Users who require the latest version of Android and frequent software updates
    • Users who want the most advanced connectivity.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Pixel 9 Pro Fold is much more expensive, which is a very important factor.
  2. How important is screen size, quality and foldable form factor? The Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a much larger and better screen with a foldable design.
  3. How much do you care about performance? The Pixel 9 Pro Fold has much better performance, which will be a key factor for heavy users and gamers.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Budget-Conscious User: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G for basic smartphone needs and if the user is on a strict budget and does not need high-end features.
  • Power User/Content Creator: Select the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold for the best performance, large immersive display, better camera capabilities, and if budget is not a primary concern.
  • Frequent Multitasker/Gamer: Opt for the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold due to its superior performance and larger screen, also for the higher refresh rate for a smooth gaming experience.
  • Basic User: The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G is the better option. It offers a more convenient and lighter device for everyday use, and a dedicated macro and depth camera which the Pixel Fold does not have.
  • Users who value audio quality: The Pixel 9 Pro Fold is the better option.

My Choice

If I had to choose, I would pick the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold, despite its higher cost. The superior performance, significantly better display quality, more versatile camera system with telephoto, and the innovative foldable form factor make it a more compelling option for my needs. I value the large screen for multitasking and media consumption, the more advanced camera system for high-quality photos and videos, and the superior performance for running demanding applications. While the A32 5G is a good phone at a lower price point, the Pixel 9 Pro Fold aligns more closely with what I seek in a smartphone for both productivity and entertainment. The benefits the Pixel 9 Pro Fold offers such as the superior display, performance, camera capabilities, and connectivity, outweigh the cost premium that comes with it.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.