Samsung Galaxy A25 vs vivo V40 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
vivo V40
vivo V40
Vivo

General

Launch Date December 16, 2023 July 3, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 102.23 cm³ 93.59 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.3 "/g 3.57 "/g
Weight 197 g 190 g
Height 161 mm 164.2 mm
Width 76.5 mm 75 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Brave Black
  • Optimistic Blue
  • Personality Yellow
  • Fantasy Blue
  • Moonlight White
  • Stellar Silver (Titanium Grey)
  • Nebula Purple (Lotus Purple)
  • Ganges Blue
  • Sunglow Peach

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1260 x 2800
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.2 % 90.1 %
Pixel Density 396 PPI 453 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 4500 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 119.65 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.91 mAh/cm³ 58.76 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1280 (5 nm) Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G68 Adreno 720

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A25 vs. vivo V40: A Holistic Comparative Analysis

As a technology researcher, my analysis goes beyond simple spec comparisons to provide a holistic understanding of the Samsung Galaxy A25 and vivo V40 within the broader mobile landscape.

1. Comprehensive Specification Mapping

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A25vivo V40Technological ContextStrategic Category
Launch Date2023-12-162024-07-03Indicates market positioning and access to latest software/hardware advancements.Ecosystem Integration
Display6.5" Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM)6.78" AMOLED, HDR10+, 120Hz, 4500 nits (peak)Screen size and quality significantly impact user experience; HDR10+ offers superior dynamic range.User Experience Indicators
Resolution1080 x 23401260 x 2800Higher resolution contributes to sharper visuals, especially on larger screens.User Experience Indicators
ChipsetExynos 1280 (5nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm)Chipset dictates performance, efficiency, and feature support. 4nm process generally means better efficiency.Performance Metrics
CPUOcta-core (2x2.4 GHz A78 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz A715 & 3x2.4 GHz A715 & 4x1.8 GHz A510)Core configuration and clock speed determine processing power. Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 generally has better architecture and performance.Performance Metrics
GPUMali-G68Adreno 720GPU performance crucial for gaming and graphically demanding applications. Adreno 720 offers more robust graphics capabilities.Performance Metrics
Battery5000 mAh5500 mAhBattery capacity directly impacts usage time.User Experience Indicators
OSAndroid 14 (up to 18)Android 14OS version and update cycle influence features, security, and longevity.Ecosystem Integration
Storage256GB/8GB RAM512GB/12GB RAMStorage and RAM impact multitasking and app performance. Vivo offers significantly more storage and RAM.Performance Metrics
Price RangeMediumMediumPrice positioning within the market segment.Ecosystem Integration

2. Strategic Technological Insights

  • Display Technology: Vivo's HDR10+ and higher peak brightness suggest a focus on premium visual experiences, leveraging advancements in display technology. Samsung's Super AMOLED with 120Hz offers a smooth user experience.
  • Processing Power: Vivo's Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, built on a 4nm process, signifies a potential advantage in performance and efficiency over Samsung's Exynos 1280.
  • Memory Configuration: Vivo's larger storage and RAM options cater to users demanding high performance and ample storage for multimedia.

3. User Ecosystem Alignment

  • Power Users: Vivo V40's superior processing power, larger memory, and enhanced display may appeal to users who prioritize performance and multimedia consumption.
  • General Users: Samsung Galaxy A25 offers a balance of features and affordability, suitable for users with moderate performance needs.

4. Future-Oriented Decision Framework

  • 5G and Connectivity: Analysis lacks data on 5G capabilities, crucial for future-proofing.
  • Camera Technology: Missing camera specifications hinder a complete evaluation of imaging capabilities, a key differentiator in the modern smartphone market.
  • Software Updates: Samsung's commitment to longer OS updates could be a decisive factor for users prioritizing long-term device usability.

My Choice: vivo V40

Based on the available information, I would choose the vivo V40. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 processor, combined with the ample RAM and storage, promises a smoother and more powerful user experience. The superior display technology with HDR10+ and higher brightness is also a compelling factor for multimedia consumption. While specific details on 5G and camera capabilities are missing, the overall performance and feature set of the Vivo V40 align better with my preference for a future-proof device. However, I would conduct further research on camera specs, 5G capabilities, and real-world performance benchmarks before making a final decision.

Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.