1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A24 4G | Motorola Moto G35 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions (mm) | 162.1 x 77.6 x 8.3 | 166.3 x 76 x 7.8 | Moto G35 is slightly larger and thinner. Negligible difference in daily use. |
| Weight (g) | 195 | 188 | Moto G35 is slightly lighter, but the difference is minimal. |
| Display | |||
| Display Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz | A24 offers more vibrant colors and deeper blacks with AMOLED. G35 has a smoother experience due to the higher refresh rate. |
| Size (inches) | 6.5 | 6.72 | G35 has a slightly larger screen, providing more screen real estate. |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 | 1080 x 2400 | Similar resolutions, resulting in comparable sharpness. |
| Peak Brightness (nits) | 1000 | 1000 | Both offer good outdoor visibility. |
| HDR | No | HDR10 | G35 supports HDR content, resulting in better dynamic range in supported videos. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) | Unisoc T760 (6nm) | Both are mid-range chipsets. Performance differences likely minimal for everyday tasks. More benchmarks needed for definitive comparison. |
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz A76 & 6x2.0 GHz A55) | Octa-core (1x2.2 GHz A76 & 3x A76 & 4x A55) | Core configuration suggests G35 might have slightly better multi-core performance, though real-world difference may be negligible. Clock speeds for the middle 3 cores of the G35 are not specified. |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 | G35 may have a slightly more powerful GPU variant, but further information needed on the specific variant (e.g., MC3, MC4). |
| RAM | 6GB (as reviewed) | 8GB (as reviewed) | G35 offers better multitasking capabilities with more RAM. |
| Camera | |||
| Main Camera | 50MP, f/1.8, OIS | 50MP, f/1.8 | Similar main camera specs. OIS on A24 provides better stabilization for photos and videos. |
| Ultrawide | 5MP | 8MP | G35 has a higher resolution ultrawide, potentially capturing more detail. |
| Macro | 2MP | None | Dedicated macro lens on A24, though low resolution limits practical use. |
| Selfie | 13MP | 16MP | G35 has a higher resolution selfie camera. |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps | G35 can record video at a higher resolution. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | Similar battery capacities. Real-world battery life will depend on usage and software optimization. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G Advantages:
- Superior Display Quality: AMOLED provides vibrant colors and deeper blacks, enhancing media consumption.
- Optical Image Stabilization (OIS): Enables sharper photos and smoother videos.
Motorola Moto G35 Advantages:
- Higher Refresh Rate: 120Hz display offers smoother scrolling and animations.
- Larger Display: Provides more screen real estate for multitasking and media consumption.
- More RAM: 8GB RAM ensures smoother multitasking and better performance with multiple apps.
- Higher Resolution Video Recording: 4K video recording capabilities.
- 5G Connectivity: Offers faster data speeds and lower latency in areas with 5G coverage.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G: Ideal for users who prioritize display quality and camera stability. Suitable for:
- Media Consumption: Watching videos, browsing photos.
- Casual Photography: Taking everyday photos and videos.
Motorola Moto G35: Ideal for users who value a smooth user experience, larger display and future-proof connectivity. Suitable for:
- Power Users: Multitasking with several apps, mobile gaming.
- Content Creators: Recording high-resolution videos.
- Users needing 5G: Those in areas with 5G coverage or anticipating future 5G availability.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- Is display quality or refresh rate more important? AMOLED on A24 provides better colors and blacks; 120Hz on G35 offers smoother animations.
- Is camera stability or video resolution a higher priority? A24 offers OIS for steadier shots; G35 records in 4K.
- Do you need 5G connectivity? G35 offers 5G for faster data speeds where available.
My Choice: Motorola Moto G35
While the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G boasts a superior display in terms of color vibrancy and blacks, the Motorola Moto G35 offers a more compelling overall package for my needs. The 120Hz refresh rate provides a noticeably smoother user experience in everyday tasks, and the larger display is more immersive for media consumption and productivity. The 8GB RAM is also significant, ensuring smoother multitasking and better long-term performance as apps become more demanding. The 5G connectivity future-proofs the device, offering faster speeds and lower latency as 5G networks continue to expand. While I appreciate the OIS on the A24, the G35's 4K video recording capability is more important to me. The slightly larger size and negligible weight difference are not significant factors in my decision. Overall, the Moto G35 strikes a better balance of performance, features, and future-proofing.
