Samsung Galaxy A23 vs Nothing CMF Phone 1 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 25, 2022 July 9, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 106.84 cm³ 103.55 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.39 "/g
Weight 195 g 197 g
Height 165.4 mm 164 mm
Width 76.9 mm 77 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Peach
  • Black
  • Orange
  • Light Green

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.5 % 85.1 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 2000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.8 mAh/cm³ 48.29 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 14 16

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Samsung Galaxy A23 and the Nothing CMF Phone 1, focusing on the user experience rather than just specs.

Design and Usability Assessment

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A23Nothing CMF Phone 1User Experience Impact
Interface DesignOne UI (Android 12)Nothing OS (Android 14)Nothing OS, based on a cleaner, near-stock Android experience, potentially offers a smoother, less cluttered interface compared to Samsung's One UI.
Interaction FlowStandard AndroidPotentially smoother due to newer OS and faster refresh rateThe CMF Phone 1's 120Hz AMOLED display could provide a more fluid and responsive experience compared to the A23's 90Hz LCD.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard AndroidStandard AndroidBoth likely offer standard Android accessibility features, but specific implementations may vary.
Design ErgonomicsPlastic bodyPlastic bodySimilar materials; in-hand feel would likely depend on subtle design differences like curvature and weight distribution.

Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration

Scenario: Imagine a student using their phone for note-taking in a lecture hall. The A23's 90Hz PLS LCD screen provides adequate clarity, but the CMF Phone 1's 120Hz AMOLED screen with higher peak brightness makes notes easier to read, especially in brightly lit environments. The smoother scrolling on the CMF also enhances the experience of reviewing lengthy documents.

Inclusive Technology Evaluation

User 1: A senior citizen who prioritizes simplicity. Both phones offer standard Android functionality, but the cleaner interface of the Nothing Phone might be less daunting.

User 2: A young professional who values performance and aesthetics. The CMF Phone 1's superior display and potentially smoother performance due to the newer chipset might be more appealing.

Design-Centric Decision Framework

While raw specs are important, the overall experience is key. The Nothing CMF Phone 1, despite being newer, offers a potentially more refined user experience due to its AMOLED display with a faster refresh rate, cleaner software experience with a newer Android version, and a slightly faster processor. The Samsung Galaxy A23 is a solid option with a larger battery capacity and wider availability of lower storage options for budget-conscious users, but it might not feel as premium or fluid in everyday use.

My Choice: Nothing CMF Phone 1

While the Samsung Galaxy A23 is a reliable device, I would choose the Nothing CMF Phone 1. The superior AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate significantly impacts daily interactions, making everything from scrolling through social media to taking notes feel smoother and more responsive. The cleaner Android experience of Nothing OS and the potentially faster performance due to the newer chipset contribute to a more enjoyable user experience. While NFC is missing, the advantages in core user experience elements like display and software outweigh this omission for me. The design, while subjective, feels fresher and more modern. Ultimately, the CMF Phone 1 better embodies my philosophy of prioritizing user-centered design and a fluid, engaging user experience.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.