Alright, let's dive into a detailed comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G and the Motorola Moto G35. I’ll break down the specs, highlight key differences, and offer some real-world context to help you make the best choice.
1. Specifications Breakdown
Here's a side-by-side look at the key specifications and what they mean for you:
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A23 5G | Motorola Moto G35 | Real-World Implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4 mm | 166.3 x 76 x 7.8 mm | Moto G35 is slightly thinner and lighter, which may make it feel more comfortable during prolonged use. |
| Weight | 197g | 188g | Moto G35 is negligibly lighter; most users won't notice. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.6" | 6.72" | Moto G35 offers a slightly larger screen for a more immersive experience. |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 1080x2400 | Both displays are similar sharpness; both are good for everyday use. |
| PPI | 400 | 392 | Virtually indistinguishable in terms of clarity; both are good for reading text and viewing images |
| Technology | PLS LCD | IPS LCD | IPS LCD generally provides better viewing angles and color accuracy than PLS LCD; Moto G35 has the edge here. |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Both offer smoother scrolling and animation, which will be a great experience for any user. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 1000 nits | Moto G35's display will be much easier to see in bright sunlight. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 695 5G | Unisoc T760 | Both chipsets are on the 6nm node; they'll perform similarly in everyday tasks and most games. |
| AnTuTu Score | 418,000 | 423,297 | Both provide sufficient power for daily use, multitasking, and gaming. |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 | Both GPUs can handle most tasks; performance is similar for daily use. |
| Battery Life | |||
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Both phones have a large capacity, likely delivering all-day battery life. |
| Charging | 25W Fast Charging | 18W Fast Charging | Galaxy A23 5G will charge faster, reducing downtime significantly. |
| Features | Bypass Charging | None | Galaxy A23 5G can bypass charging while gaming or using demanding apps, potentially extending battery lifespan, |
| Camera | |||
| Main Camera Resolution | 50MP f/1.8 | 50MP f/1.8 | Both feature good main cameras, performing similarly under most lighting conditions. |
| Selfie Camera Resolution | 8MP f/2.0 | 16MP f/2.45 | Moto G35’s selfies will be sharper and more detailed; Galaxy A23 5G does have a slightly wider aperture for more light capture. |
| Wide-Angle Resolution | 5MP f/2.2 | 8MP f/2.2 | Moto G35 will produce more detailed wide-angle shots. |
| Portrait Mode | 2MP f/2.4 | None | Galaxy A23 5G includes a dedicated depth sensor for portrait effects. |
| Macro Lens | 2MP f/2.4 | None | Galaxy A23 5G provides a dedicated macro lens for close-up photography. |
| Video Resolution | 1080p@30fps; Yes; Slow-motion: Yes, 120 fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps; No; Slow-motion: Yes, 120 fps | Moto G35 captures higher resolution 4k video, but it does not offer digital stabilization. |
| Software | |||
| Operating System | Android 12 (up to 14) | Android 14 | Moto G35 comes with the latest software out of the box. |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | 802.11ac | 802.11ac; Dual Band, Wi-Fi Display | Moto G35 has the advantage with dual-band Wi-Fi and screen mirroring. |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 LE | 5.0 LE | Galaxy A23 5G has a slightly more advanced and efficient Bluetooth version. |
| SIM | Single (Nano SIM) | Dual SIM (Nano SIM + eSIM) | Moto G35 has an edge for traveling users or those wanting to manage two numbers more easily. |
| Storage & RAM | |||
| Internal Storage | Unknown | 128 GB or 256 GB | Moto G35 offers more built-in storage. |
| RAM | Unknown | 4 GB or 8 GB | Moto G35 offers more RAM for smoother multitasking, especially with the 8GB option. |
| Expandable Storage | None | None | Both phones do not allow expandable storage. |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | Basic | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 2 Mics | Moto G35 provides a much better audio experience. |
| Security | |||
| Features | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Both phones offer a basic biometric security. |
| Build Quality | |||
| Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Galaxy A23 5G offers better screen protection against drops and scratches. |
| Sensors | |||
| Features | Barometer, Ultrasonic proximity | Proximity, Compass | The Galaxy A23 5G has more sensors, including a Barometer for environmental measurements and an Ultrasonic sensor for more accurate proximity readings while the Moto G35 offers a digital compass. |
2. Key Insights
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
- Strengths:
- Faster charging and bypass charging for extended gaming and app usage
- Enhanced screen protection with Gorilla Glass 5.
- Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) for improved image quality in low-light and during video recording.
- Wider Bluetooth support.
- Additional sensors.
- Trade-Offs:
- Older version of Android out of the box
- Basic audio experience and display brightness
Motorola Moto G35
- Strengths:
- Larger display and higher brightness, for excellent readability, especially in sunlight.
- More internal storage and RAM.
- Newer version of Android out of the box.
- Improved front-facing camera and wide-angle camera performance.
- 4K video capability.
- Superior audio features.
- Dual SIM, eSIM, and dual standby.
- Trade-Offs:
- Slower charging.
- Less screen protection.
- Lacks dedicated depth sensor and macro lens.
3. User Profiles and Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G is ideal for:
- Users who prioritize battery longevity, fast charging and a more durable display
- Users who value image quality and better video stabilization.
- Users who prefer additional sensors such as barometer.
Motorola Moto G35 is perfect for:
- Users who prioritize a larger screen with high brightness, making it easier to view outdoors.
- Users who want more storage and better multitasking.
- Users who value superior audio quality and advanced connectivity.
- Users who are looking for latest Android software.
4. Buying Decision Framework
To help you decide, ask yourself these questions:
- How often do I use my phone outdoors in bright sunlight?
- If often, the Motorola Moto G35's brighter screen will be a significant benefit.
- Do I prioritize faster charging or better audio and video features?
- If faster charging, the Galaxy A23 5G is better. If better audio/video, the Moto G35 takes the lead.
- How important is having the latest version of Android?
- If very important, the Moto G35 comes with Android 14, while the Galaxy A23 5G starts with Android 12 and may need updating.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- The Frequent Traveler: Moto G35's Dual SIM and eSIM support is great for managing multiple numbers across different regions.
- The Content Creator: The Moto G35’s 4K video recording and better selfie and wide angle camera make it ideal for capturing high-quality content.
- The Mobile Gamer: The Galaxy A23 5G's bypass charging and faster charging is great for extending gaming sessions without worrying about your battery.
- The Casual User: Both are very similar, but the Motorola Moto G35's brighter screen and better audio experience are a plus, though the Samsung's protection screen may be appealing if you're more prone to breaking your screen.
Personal Choice:
If I had to choose between these two phones, I would lean towards the Motorola Moto G35. Here's why:
For me, the brighter display and the upgraded video capture are a huge advantage. I often find myself outdoors and a screen that's easily visible in sunlight makes a world of difference. While the Samsung offers OIS, having that extra bit of video resolution and a better wide angle and selfie cameras is more useful for my daily content creation and general video capture needs. The stereo speakers are also a really nice plus for those times when I'm showing videos to friends or listening to music on the go. While it does not offer a depth sensor, I use it rarely and the other camera advantages outweigh this. Yes, the charging speed might not be as fast, but the advantages elsewhere make it a compelling daily driver for me.
Ultimately, the best choice comes down to your priorities, what you value, and what use-case is the most common. Both phones have their strengths and will cater to different needs and preferences.
