Samsung Galaxy A14 vs Samsung Galaxy M55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 27, 2023 March 28, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 119.03 cm³ 97.8 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.28 "/g 3.72 "/g
Weight 201 g 180 g
Height 167.7 mm 163.9 mm
Width 78 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Green
  • Dark Red
  • Light Green
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 80.2 % 86.4 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 42 mAh/cm³ 51.13 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version A Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version A Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Adreno 644

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A14Samsung Galaxy M55Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)167.7 x 78 x 9.1163.9 x 76.5 x 7.8M55 is slightly smaller and thinner, making it potentially more pocketable.
Weight (g)201180M55 is noticeably lighter, improving one-handed use and reducing fatigue.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.7Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24081080 x 2400Virtually identical sharpness.
TypePLS LCDSuper AMOLED+M55 offers significantly better contrast, colors, and viewing angles due to AMOLED technology. Its 120Hz refresh rate will result in smoother animations and scrolling compared to the A14's unspecified refresh rate (likely 60Hz).
Refresh Rate (Hz)Unspecified120M55's 120Hz provides a smoother and more responsive user experience.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G80 (12nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm)M55 boasts a significantly more powerful and efficient processor, leading to much faster performance in demanding tasks, smoother multitasking, and better battery life.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)M55's CPU architecture is newer and more powerful.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Adreno 644M55 offers significantly better graphics performance for gaming and other visually demanding applications.
RAM (GB)48M55 has double the RAM, enabling better multitasking and smoother performance with multiple apps open.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Resolution is similar, but image quality will likely differ due to sensor and processing differences. M55 also has Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) for sharper photos and videos in low light or when moving.
Front Camera (MP)1350M55 has a much higher resolution front camera for significantly better selfies.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fps with OIS, EISM55 offers much higher video resolution and stabilization, resulting in significantly better video quality.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacity. However, real-world battery life will depend on usage and the M55's more efficient processor could provide longer usage.
Fast Charging15W45WM55 supports significantly faster charging, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A14 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Expected to be significantly cheaper.

Samsung Galaxy M55 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly faster processor, GPU, and more RAM.
  • Better Display: AMOLED technology with a 120Hz refresh rate provides a more vibrant and smooth visual experience.
  • Enhanced Camera: Higher resolution front camera, 4K video recording, and Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) for better photo and video quality.
  • Faster Charging: 45W fast charging significantly reduces charging time.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A14:

  • Budget-conscious users: For users prioritizing affordability over high-end features.
  • Basic smartphone users: Suitable for calling, texting, web browsing, and light social media use.

Samsung Galaxy M55:

  • Performance-focused users: Ideal for gamers, power users, and those who demand smooth multitasking.
  • Multimedia enthusiasts: Excellent for consuming media, capturing high-quality photos and videos, and enjoying a premium visual experience.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The A14 is likely a much more affordable option.
  2. What are your primary smartphone uses? For basic tasks, the A14 might suffice. For demanding applications and multimedia, the M55 is superior.
  3. How important is display quality and smoothness? The M55's AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate is a major advantage.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy M55

While the Samsung Galaxy A14 offers a budget-friendly option, the Samsung Galaxy M55 is the clear winner for me. The significantly improved performance, superior display, enhanced camera capabilities, and faster charging outweigh the price difference. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, coupled with 8GB of RAM and a 120Hz AMOLED display, promises a fluid and enjoyable user experience. The investment in the M55 would likely provide a more future-proof and satisfying smartphone experience in the long run. The superior camera features, especially OIS, are also crucial for capturing high-quality photos and videos. While price is a factor, the performance and feature gap between the two phones is substantial enough to justify choosing the M55.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.