Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137) vs Motorola Moto G35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date July 1, 2022 September 25, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 111 cm³ 98.58 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.57 "/g
Weight 195 g 188 g
Height 165.1 mm 166.3 mm
Width 76.4 mm 76 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Midnight Black
  • Sage Green
  • Leaf Green
  • Guava Red

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.72 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.2 % 86.3 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 392 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 110.72 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.05 mAh/cm³ 50.72 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) Unisoc T760 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x Cortex-A76 & 4x Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Mali-G57

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A13 vs. Motorola Moto G35: A Deep Dive for the Discerning Smartphone User

Let's cut through the marketing jargon and dissect the Samsung Galaxy A13 and the Motorola Moto G35, focusing on what truly matters: how these devices perform in the real world.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137)Motorola Moto G35Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)165.1 x 76.4 x 8.8166.3 x 76 x 7.8Moto G35 is slightly larger but thinner. Negligible difference in hand.
Weight (g)195188Moto G35 is marginally lighter.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.72Moto G35 offers a slightly larger screen.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24081080 x 2400Virtually identical sharpness.
Refresh Rate (Hz)Standard120Moto G35's 120Hz delivers smoother scrolling and animations.
Display TypePLS LCDIPS LCDComparable color accuracy and viewing angles. Moto G35 boasts HDR10 and higher peak brightness.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G80 (12nm)Unisoc T760 (6nm)Moto G35's newer 6nm chipset likely offers better performance and efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz A75 & 6x1.8 GHz A55)Octa-core (1x2.2 GHz A76 & 3x A76 & 4x A55)Moto G35 has a more powerful CPU architecture for demanding tasks.
RAM (GB)3/48Moto G35's 8GB RAM ensures smoother multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Comparable resolution. Need real-world image comparison for quality assessment.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fpsMoto G35 offers superior video recording capabilities with 4K and slow-motion.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity. Real-world usage will depend on chip efficiency.
Fast Charging25W18WGalaxy A13 offers faster charging.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Moto G35's more modern and powerful Unisoc T760 chipset, coupled with 8GB of RAM, significantly outpaces the Galaxy A13 in processing power and multitasking capabilities. This translates to smoother gaming, faster app loading, and a more responsive overall experience.
  • Display: While both phones have similar resolutions, the Moto G35's 120Hz refresh rate provides a noticeably smoother and more fluid visual experience. The addition of HDR10 on the Moto G35 will also make supported content look more vibrant.
  • Camera: Both have 50MP main cameras, but the Moto G35's ability to record 4K video at 30fps and 1080p slow motion at 120fps sets it apart for content creators. We need more data (sensor size, aperture) to truly judge image quality.
  • Battery & Charging: Both phones feature a 5000mAh battery. However, the Galaxy A13 has the advantage in charging speed with 25W fast charging compared to the Moto G35's 18W. Real-world battery life will depend on the efficiency of each phone's chipset and software.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Galaxy A13: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic smartphone functionality, long battery life, and fast charging. Ideal for casual web browsing, social media, and light photography.
  • Moto G35: An excellent choice for users who demand smoother performance, a more responsive display, and advanced video recording capabilities. Perfect for mobile gamers, content creators, and those who value a fluid user experience.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What is your budget? The Galaxy A13 generally comes at a lower price point.
  • What are your performance expectations? The Moto G35 provides a significantly smoother and more powerful experience.
  • What are your primary use cases? Consider whether you prioritize gaming, content creation, or basic functionality.

My Choice: I would choose the Motorola Moto G35. While the Galaxy A13 offers faster charging, the Moto G35's superior performance, smoother 120Hz display, and more advanced video recording capabilities are more compelling to me. As a tech journalist, I value a responsive and fluid user experience, along with the ability to capture high-quality video content. The Moto G35's more modern chipset ensures it will remain performant for a longer period, making it a better long-term investment.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.