Alright, let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho and the Motorola Moto G35. I'll break down the specs, highlight key differences, and help you figure out which one might be the better fit for your needs.
1. Specifications Breakdown
Here's a detailed comparison of the key specifications, focusing on what they mean for real-world usage:
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho | Motorola Moto G35 | Real-World Implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 164 × 75.8 × 8.9 mm | 166.3 × 76 × 7.8 mm | G35 is taller and thinner, A12 Nacho is slightly thicker. |
| Weight | 205g | 188g | G35 is lighter, potentially more comfortable to hold. |
| Build | Unknown | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | G35 has screen protection from scratches and impacts |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.5" | 6.72" | G35 offers a slightly larger viewing area. |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2400 | G35 has a much sharper and clearer display. |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 270 | 392 | G35's display will look significantly more detailed. |
| Technology | PLS LCD | IPS LCD | G35: Likely better viewing angles and color accuracy. |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 120Hz | G35 provides smoother scrolling and animations. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 1000 nits | G35 is significantly better for outdoor visibility. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Exynos 850 (8 nm) | Unisoc T760 (6 nm) | G35: Expect faster app loading, smoother multitasking. |
| AnTuTu Score | 117,300 | 423,297 | G35 is significantly more powerful. |
| GPU | Mali-G52 | Mali-G57 MP4 | G35 should handle graphics-intensive tasks better. |
| Camera | |||
| Main Camera | 48MP, f/2.0 | 50MP, f/1.8 | G35: Slightly better low-light performance due to aperture. |
| Selfie Camera | 8MP, f/2.2 | 16MP, f/2.45 | G35: Higher resolution for sharper selfies. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 5MP, f/2.0 | 8MP, f/2.2 | G35: Higher resolution for wider shots. |
| Portrait Mode | Yes (2MP) | No | A12 Nacho: Dedicated depth sensor for portrait shots. |
| Macro Lens | Yes (2MP) | No | A12 Nacho: Can take close-up photos of small objects. |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | G35: Can record higher resolution videos. |
| Battery Life | |||
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Similar battery life. |
| Charging | 15W | 18W | G35: Slightly faster charging times. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11 (Upgradable to 13) | Android 14 | G35: Newer Android version, potentially longer support. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 32/64/128GB | 128/256GB | G35: More storage options. |
| RAM | 3/4/6GB | 4/8GB | G35: Better multitasking capabilities. |
| Expandable Storage | No | No | Limited to internal storage only. |
2. Key Insights
- Motorola Moto G35 Strengths: The Moto G35 shines with its superior display (higher resolution, pixel density, and refresh rate), significantly better performance (chipset and AnTuTu score), better main and selfie camera, and 4k video recording, and the latest Android Version. The G35 also has a better build with the Corning Gorilla Glass 3.
- Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho Strengths: The A12 Nacho has dedicated macro and depth cameras for those who enjoy close-up photography and portrait mode.
- Trade-offs: The A12 Nacho offers a dedicated macro and depth camera, which the G35 lacks. However, this comes at the expense of overall performance and display quality.
- Limitations: Neither phone has expandable storage, which can be a concern for users with large media libraries.
3. User Profiles and Recommendations
- Motorola Moto G35: This phone is ideal for users who prioritize performance, display quality, and camera capabilities. It's a great choice for anyone who enjoys streaming videos, playing games, or taking high-quality photos.
- Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho: The A12 Nacho is suitable for users who need a budget-friendly option and value the dedicated macro and depth cameras.
- Price-to-Value: The Moto G35 offers significantly more value for the money, given its superior performance and features.
4. Buying Decision Framework
Here are three practical questions to help you decide:
- How important is display quality to you? If you consume a lot of media or play games, the G35's higher resolution and refresh rate will be a game-changer.
- Do you heavily rely on a macro or depth camera? If so, the A12 Nacho might be a better fit.
- What is your budget? If you need the most affordable option, the A12 Nacho may be the only choice.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Budget Gamer: Go for the Motorola Moto G35 for smoother gameplay, better graphics, and more responsive performance.
- Casual Photographer: If you love taking pictures, the Motorola Moto G35 has the better rear and front camera.
- General User on a Tight Budget: The Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho would be your best bet.
My Choice
If I were to choose between these two phones, I would go with the Motorola Moto G35.
Here's why:
As a tech journalist and smartphone analyst, I prioritize performance, display quality, and camera capabilities. The Moto G35's superior display (higher resolution, pixel density, and refresh rate), significantly better performance (chipset and AnTuTu score), better main and selfie camera and 4k video recording make it the clear winner in my book. I value the smooth user experience that comes with a higher refresh rate display and the faster app loading and multitasking capabilities.
While the Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho offers dedicated macro and depth cameras, I find that the overall benefits of the Moto G35 outweigh this advantage.
