Realme C53 vs Motorola Moto G35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C53
Realme C53
Realme

General

Launch Date May 31, 2023 September 25, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 96.24 cm³ 98.58 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.7 "/g 3.57 "/g
Weight 182 g 188 g
Height 167.3 mm 166.3 mm
Width 76.7 mm 76 mm
Thickness 7.5 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Champion Gold
  • Mighty Black
  • Midnight Black
  • Sage Green
  • Leaf Green
  • Guava Red

Display

Screen Size 6.74 " 6.72 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.5 % 86.3 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 392 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 560 nits 1000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 110.07 mAh/in² 110.72 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.95 mAh/cm³ 50.72 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) Unisoc T760 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x Cortex-A76 & 4x Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 Mali-G57

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureRealme C53Motorola Moto G35Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)167.3 x 76.7 x 7.5166.3 x 76 x 7.8Realme C53 is slightly taller and thinner. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)182188Realme C53 is slightly lighter, but the difference is minimal.
Display
Size (inches)6.746.72Virtually identical screen sizes.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2400Same resolution, offering sharp visuals on both.
Panel TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth use IPS LCD technology, expecting similar color accuracy and viewing angles.
Refresh Rate (Hz)90120Moto G35's 120Hz offers smoother scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)5601000Moto G35 significantly brighter, improving outdoor visibility.
HDRNoHDR10Moto G35 supports HDR content for better dynamic range and color.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc Tiger T612 (12nm)Unisoc T760 (6nm)Moto G35's 6nm chipset should offer better performance and power efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (2x1.8 GHz A75 & 6x1.8 GHz A55)Octa-core (1x2.2 GHz A76 & 3x A76 & 4x A55)Moto G35 boasts a more powerful CPU architecture with higher clock speeds, resulting in faster processing.
GPUMali-G57Mali-G57 MP4Moto G35 likely has a more powerful GPU variant (MP4 vs unspecified in Realme), leading to better gaming performance.
RAM (GB)6/84/8RAM options vary. 8GB provides better multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Similar megapixel count, but sensor details are crucial for image quality comparison, which are missing for Realme C53. Moto G35 specifies Samsung S5KJN1 sensor.
Selfie Camera (MP)816Moto G35 offers a higher resolution selfie camera.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fpsMoto G35 offers significantly better video recording capabilities with 4K resolution and slow-motion options.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacities, expected similar battery life depending on usage and chip efficiency.
Other
NFCNoYesMoto G35 supports contactless payments and data transfer via NFC.
OSAndroid 13Android 14Moto G35 comes with a newer Android version, potentially offering more features and longer software support.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Realme C53 Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: More widely available RAM/Storage configuration options might lead to lower entry price points.

Motorola Moto G35 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: More efficient and powerful processor, potentially better for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Smoother Display: 120Hz refresh rate provides a noticeable improvement in user experience.
  • Brighter Display: Much higher peak brightness ensures better visibility in sunlight.
  • Better Camera Features: Higher resolution selfie camera, 4K video recording, and slow-motion capabilities.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and other NFC functionalities.
  • Newer Android Version: Android 14 offers potential software and security advantages.

Trade-offs:

  • The Moto G35's advanced features likely come at a higher price.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Realme C53: Budget-conscious users prioritizing basic smartphone functionalities (calling, messaging, social media) without heavy gaming or demanding applications.

Motorola Moto G35: Users seeking a well-rounded experience with smooth performance, a vibrant display, good camera capabilities, and modern features like NFC. Suitable for moderate gaming, media consumption, and multitasking.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Budget: How much are you willing to spend?
  2. Performance Needs: Do you require a phone for demanding tasks or gaming?
  3. Feature Importance: Are features like NFC, a high refresh rate display, and better camera capabilities important?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Tight Budget, Basic Usage: Realme C53
  • Balanced Budget, All-Around Performance: Motorola Moto G35

My Choice: Motorola Moto G35

While pricing details aren't fully clear, the Motorola Moto G35 offers significant advantages in performance, display quality, camera features, and overall user experience. The newer chipset, higher refresh rate, brighter screen, better camera capabilities, and inclusion of NFC justify the potential price difference for a user experience that will feel significantly more premium. The Realme C53 seems to target a very budget-conscious market where basic functionality is the priority. However, for a slightly higher investment, the Moto G35's long-term value proposition is superior due to better performance and newer technology.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.