Realme 8 vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme 8
Realme 8
Realme

General

Launch Date March 25, 2021 June 5, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 94.95 cm³ 88.47 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.62 "/g 3.74 "/g
Weight 177 g 184.5 g
Height 160.6 mm 170.8 mm
Width 73.9 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8 mm 7 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Cyber Silver
  • Cyber Black
  • Glacier Blue
  • Viva Magenta
  • Infinite Black
  • Peach Fuzz

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.3 % 85.2 %
Pixel Density 411 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 165 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1000 nits 1400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 79.82 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.66 mAh/cm³ 42.95 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 3800 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G76 MC4 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureRealme 8Motorola Razr 40 UltraPractical Impact
Form FactorStandardFoldableMotorola Razr 40 Ultra offers unique foldable design for compact size and a larger inner display; Realme 8 has a traditional form factor.
Dimensions160.6 × 73.9 × 8 mm170.8 × 74 × 7 mmMotorola Razr 40 Ultra is taller and slightly thinner when unfolded; Realme 8 has a smaller footprint.
Weight177g184.5gRealme 8 is marginally lighter, potentially more comfortable for extended handheld use.

Display

FeatureRealme 8Motorola Razr 40 UltraPractical Impact
Size6.4"6.9"Motorola Razr 40 Ultra offers a larger display, better for media consumption and multitasking.
Resolution1080x24001080x2640Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a slightly sharper display due to a higher pixel count but very similar PPI.
Pixel Density411 PPI413 PPIBoth have very similar pixel densities, resulting in similar perceived sharpness.
TechnologyAMOLEDUnspecifiedRealme 8's AMOLED offers richer colors and better contrast, while Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's display technology is not specified.
Refresh Rate60Hz165HzMotorola Razr 40 Ultra provides a much smoother visual experience, especially in gaming and scrolling.
Brightness1000 nits1400 nitsMotorola Razr 40 Ultra is significantly brighter, making it more usable in direct sunlight.

Performance

FeatureRealme 8Motorola Razr 40 UltraPractical Impact
ChipsetMediatek Helio G95 (12 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's chipset is significantly more powerful, providing faster performance for all tasks.
AnTuTu Score409,8741,238,000Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has over triple the benchmark performance, resulting in much faster app loading and smoother gameplay.
GPUMali-G76 MC4Adreno 730Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's GPU offers much higher graphical performance, crucial for demanding games.

Camera

FeatureRealme 8Motorola Razr 40 UltraPractical Impact
Standard Rear Camera64MP, f/1.7912MP, f/1.5Realme 8 has higher megapixel count but Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a wider aperture potentially better in low light. Sensor model and pixel size are missing for Motorola Razr 40 Ultra.
Selfie Camera16MP, f/2.4532MP, f/2.45Motorola Razr 40 Ultra captures more detailed selfies with a higher resolution sensor. Sensor model and pixel size are missing for Motorola Razr 40 Ultra.
Wide Angle Lens8MP, f/2.25NoneRealme 8 includes a dedicated wide-angle camera for capturing broader scenes; Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a combined Wide Angle + Macro lens
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.4NoneRealme 8 features a dedicated macro lens for close-up photography.
Wide Angle + Macro LensNone13MP, f/2.2Motorola Razr 40 Ultra uses a wide-angle lens as a macro lens.
Black & White Lens2MP, f/2.4NoneRealme 8 includes a dedicated black and white sensor for monochrome shots.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@30fps with EISUp to 4K@60fps with HDR, EISMotorola Razr 40 Ultra offers more versatile video recording options, including HDR.
StabilizationEISEIS, OISMotorola Razr 40 Ultra offers additional Optical Image Stabilisation for steadier video, while the Realme 8 only has Electronic image stabilization.
Camera FeaturesQuadruple camera, HDRDual camera, OIS, PDAF, LAF, RAW, Night VisionMotorola Razr 40 Ultra offers more advanced camera features and technologies, while Realme 8 has a more basic camera setup.

Battery

FeatureRealme 8Motorola Razr 40 UltraPractical Impact
Capacity5000mAh3800mAhRealme 8 has a significantly larger battery, likely offering longer battery life on a single charge.
Charging30W Fast Charging30W Fast Charging, 8W WirelessBoth support similar wired fast charging, but the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra also includes wireless charging, as well as reverse wireless charging.
Battery FeaturesNon-removableReverse Charging, Wireless Charging, Non-removableMotorola Razr 40 Ultra offers additional charging options including reverse charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Realme 8 Advantages

  • Larger Battery: 5000mAh battery offers significantly longer battery life than the Razr 40 Ultra's 3800mAh.
  • Lower Price: The Realme 8 is a budget friendly phone, while the Razr 40 Ultra is a premium device.
  • Dedicated Lenses: Includes dedicated Wide Angle, Macro, and Black & White lenses for more shooting flexibility.
  • AMOLED Display: Offers superior contrast and vibrant colors than the unspecified display of the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra.
  • Lighter weight: At 177g, the Realme 8 is noticeably lighter.

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Advantages

  • Foldable Design: Offers a unique, compact form factor with a larger display when unfolded.
  • Superior Performance: Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset provides dramatically faster performance than the Realme 8's MediaTek Helio G95.
  • Higher Refresh Rate: 165Hz refresh rate provides smoother animations and better gaming.
  • Brighter Display: 1400 nits peak brightness offers better outdoor visibility.
  • Better Camera Features: OIS, PDAF, LAF, RAW, Night Vision enhance image and video quality.
  • Newer Bluetooth Version: Uses Bluetooth 5.3.
  • Wireless charging: Allows wireless charging at 8W and reverse wireless charging, while the Realme 8 doesn't support this feature.
  • eSIM Support: Offers the option to use an eSIM in addition to the Nano SIM, while the Realme 8 only supports two nano SIMs
  • Stereo Speakers: Has better audio quality via stereo speakers while the Realme 8 only has a mono speaker.
  • Software: Runs on the newer Android 13, while the Realme 8 runs on Android 11.
  • Storage: Has a base storage of 256 GB, while the Realme 8 has a base storage of 64 GB.

Trade-offs

  • Realme 8: Sacrifices processing power and advanced features for a lower price and longer battery life. The camera, while having a higher megapixel count, might not produce the same image quality as the Motorola due to the lack of OIS, PDAF, and other high-end features.
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: Comes with a significantly smaller battery capacity for a premium performance and foldable form factor, and might require more frequent charging, especially when using high-intensity applications. The higher price point is also a notable consideration.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Ideal Users for Realme 8

  • Budget-conscious users: Those seeking a reliable phone for everyday use without breaking the bank.
  • Battery life prioritizers: Users who need long battery life and do not want to worry about frequent charging.
  • Casual gamers: Those who play less demanding games and prioritize a phone for basic tasks.
  • Users who prefer the standard form factor: Individuals who do not see the value in a foldable phone and prefer traditional devices.
  • Users who want a headphone jack: The Realme 8 features a headphone jack, which the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra does not have.

Specific Use Cases:

  • Daily communication (calls, texts, social media)
  • Watching videos and casual gaming
  • Basic photography
  • Extended use without frequent charging

Ideal Users for Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

  • Tech enthusiasts: Users who want the latest technology and unique form factors.
  • Performance seekers: Users who require smooth performance for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications.
  • Content creators: Users who value high-quality camera features such as OIS, HDR video, and RAW capture.
  • Frequent Travelers: Those who value having an eSIM and wireless charging capabilities.
  • Professionals: Those who value having a premium device with a unique form factor.

Specific Use Cases:

  • High-end mobile gaming
  • Professional photography and video recording
  • Multitasking with demanding apps
  • Unique and compact device for frequent travelers
  • Media consumption on a larger screen.

Price-to-Value Ratio

  • Realme 8: Offers excellent value for its price with a good display and long battery life.
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: While more expensive, it provides cutting-edge features and performance for users willing to invest in a premium device.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers

  1. How important is battery life? If all-day battery life is crucial, the Realme 8 is a better choice.
  2. How important is performance? If you need the best performance for demanding tasks and gaming, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is the superior option.
  3. What is your budget? If price is a major concern, the Realme 8 is a budget-friendly alternative to the expensive Razr 40 Ultra.

Scenario-Based Recommendations

  • Budget User Scenario:

    • Need: Reliable phone for basic use, long battery life, and less expensive.
    • Recommendation: Realme 8.
  • Performance User Scenario:

    • Need: Highest possible performance, best camera quality, and a cutting-edge experience.
    • Recommendation: Motorola Razr 40 Ultra.
  • Tech Enthusiast Scenario:

    • Need: Unique design, latest technology, foldable phone.
    • Recommendation: Motorola Razr 40 Ultra.
  • Balanced User Scenario:

    • Need: Want a phone that can perform well in day to day use, with good performance.
    • Recommendation: Depends on the specific user. If the budget is tight, choose the Realme 8, otherwise, choose the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra.

My Choice and Why

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would personally pick the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. Here's why:

  1. Performance is Paramount: I value smooth and fast performance for multitasking, gaming, and other demanding apps. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset in the Razr 40 Ultra is significantly more powerful and would provide a much better experience overall.
  2. Camera Capabilities: While the Realme 8 has a higher megapixel count, the camera features of the Razr 40 Ultra, like OIS, HDR, PDAF, LAF, RAW and Night Vision, are more important to me. They would result in better image quality. The 4K60 video recording capabilities are also crucial for me.
  3. Modern Experience: I prefer the newer Android 13 experience over the older Android 11 on the Realme 8. I also value the higher refresh rate display for smoother scrolling and better visual experience.
  4. Unique Foldable Design: The foldable design, while potentially less convenient at times, is very innovative and compact. This makes it a very interesting device to use.
  5. Additional Features: The wireless charging, eSIM and stereo speakers of the Razr 40 Ultra are valuable additions.

While the Realme 8 wins in terms of battery capacity and price, my usage patterns favor the performance, camera capabilities and modern experience of the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, which is why I would choose this device.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.