Realme 11 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme 11 Pro
Realme 11 Pro
Realme

General

Launch Date May 15, 2023 November 6, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 97.99 cm³ 106.14 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.66 "/g 3.51 "/g
Weight 183 g 192 g
Height 161.7 mm 168 mm
Width 73.9 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Astral Black
  • Sunrise Beige
  • Oasis Green
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.74 "
Resolution 1080 x 2412 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 90.4 % 83.7 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 600 nits
Peak Brightness 950 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.03 mAh/cm³ 47.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 15

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureRealme 11 ProXiaomi Poco C65Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.7 x 73.9 x 8.2168 x 78 x 8.1Realme 11 Pro is slightly smaller and may feel more comfortable in hand.
Weight (g)183192Realme 11 Pro is noticeably lighter.
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild quality and material impact durability and premium feel, but cannot be compared here.
Display
Display TypeAMOLEDIPS LCDRealme 11 Pro offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and better power efficiency due to AMOLED technology.
Display Size (inches)6.76.74Negligible size difference.
Resolution1080 x 2412720 x 1600Realme 11 Pro has a significantly sharper display (394 ppi vs 260 ppi), resulting in clearer text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)12090Realme 11 Pro offers smoother scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)950450 (typical), 600 (HBM)Realme 11 Pro will be much more readable in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm)Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)Dimensity 7050 offers better performance and efficiency due to smaller manufacturing process (6nm vs 12nm).
CPUOcta-core (2x2.6 GHz A78 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz A75 & 6x1.8 GHz A55)Realme 11 Pro has faster and more powerful CPU cores, leading to better multitasking and app performance.
GPUMali-G68 MC4Mali-G52 MC2Realme 11 Pro has a significantly more powerful GPU for smoother gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.
RAM (GB)8/126/8More RAM on the Realme 11 Pro allows for better multitasking and app switching.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)10050Higher resolution on Realme 11 Pro may offer more detail in photos, but image quality depends on various factors beyond resolution.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@30fps with EISUp to 1080p@30fpsRealme 11 Pro offers higher resolution video recording and Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) for smoother videos.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacities. Real-world battery life will depend on usage and software optimization.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Realme 11 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Display: Significantly sharper, brighter, and smoother due to AMOLED technology, higher resolution, and 120Hz refresh rate.
  • Better Performance: More powerful and efficient chipset, CPU, and GPU for smoother multitasking, gaming, and overall performance.
  • Enhanced Camera Capabilities: Higher resolution main camera and 4K video recording.

Xiaomi Poco C65 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Positioned in the low price range, offering greater affordability.

Trade-offs:

  • Poco C65: Sacrifices display quality, performance, and camera features for affordability.
  • Realme 11 Pro: Higher price for premium features.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Realme 11 Pro: Users who prioritize a high-quality display, smooth performance, and good camera capabilities. Ideal for gaming, multimedia consumption, and photography enthusiasts.

Xiaomi Poco C65: Budget-conscious users who primarily need a basic smartphone for calling, texting, and light internet browsing. Suitable for users who prioritize affordability over premium features.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco C65 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? For basic tasks, the Poco C65 might suffice. For demanding tasks and multimedia, the Realme 11 Pro is better.
  3. How important is display quality and performance? The Realme 11 Pro vastly outperforms the Poco C65 in these areas.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Student on a Tight Budget: Poco C65
  • Professional needing a reliable device: Realme 11 Pro
  • Mobile gamer: Realme 11 Pro
  • Casual user primarily for social media: Poco C65 (if budget is very limited), Realme 11 Pro (for a better experience).

My Choice: Realme 11 Pro

While the Xiaomi Poco C65 offers an attractive price point, the Realme 11 Pro's superior display, performance, and camera capabilities make it the better overall choice for me. The significantly improved user experience offered by the AMOLED display, 120Hz refresh rate, and the more powerful processor justifies the higher price. I prioritize a smooth and responsive user experience, and the Realme 11 Pro delivers that. The difference in daily usage would be significant enough for me to invest in the Realme 11 Pro. The Poco C65 would likely feel sluggish and frustrating in comparison, especially for tasks like gaming or multitasking.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.