Realme 11 Pro vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme 11 Pro
Realme 11 Pro
Realme

General

Launch Date May 15, 2023 September 14, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 97.99 cm³ 90.78 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.66 "/g 3.85 "/g
Weight 183 g 170 g
Height 161.7 mm 159.6 mm
Width 73.9 mm 72 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Astral Black
  • Sunrise Beige
  • Oasis Green
  • Black
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Soothing Sea
  • Caneel Bay

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.55 "
Resolution 1080 x 2412 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 90.4 % 90.1 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 402 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 950 nits 1300 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 116.54 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.03 mAh/cm³ 55.08 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Mali-G610 MC3

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 15 15

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureRealme 11 ProMotorola Edge 40 NeoPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.7 x 73.9 x 8.2159.6 x 72.0 x 7.9Edge 40 Neo is slightly smaller and thinner. May be more pocketable for some users.
Weight (g)183170Edge 40 Neo is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Display TypeAMOLEDpOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. pOLED can be slightly more power efficient. Subjective preference may play a role in perceived quality.
Size (inches)6.76.55Negligible size difference in real-world usage.
Resolution1080 x 24121080 x 2400Virtually identical sharpness.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120144Edge 40 Neo offers smoother scrolling and animations due to the higher refresh rate, particularly noticeable in games and fast-paced content.
Peak Brightness (nits)9501300Edge 40 Neo offers significantly better visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7050Mediatek Dimensity 7030Very similar performance, though benchmarks would be needed for precise comparison. Day-to-day usage differences likely negligible.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.6 GHz A78 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz A78 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)Minor clock speed difference; real-world performance likely very close.
GPUMali-G68 MC4Mali-G610 MC3G610 generally considered slightly more powerful than G68 MC4, potentially offering slightly better gaming performance.
RAM (GB)8/1212The reviewed Edge 40 Neo has more RAM than the reviewed Realme 11 Pro, enabling better multitasking and app switching. Realme does offer a 12GB RAM version, but it was not the one reviewed here.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)10050Realme boasts higher resolution, potentially capturing more detail. However, sensor size, pixel size and processing play a larger role in image quality. Motorola uses a larger sensor (1/1.55" vs 1/1.8") and larger pixel size (1.0µm vs 0.61µm), suggesting better low-light performance.
Selfie Camera (MP)1632Edge 40 Neo offers a higher resolution selfie camera, potentially resulting in more detailed self-portraits.
Video Recording4K@30fps, 1080p@120fps, 960fps slow-mo4K@30fps, 1080p@120fps, 240fps slow-moBoth offer excellent video recording capabilities. Differences in slow-motion capabilities cater to specific needs.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity suggests similar battery life, though actual usage will depend on various factors like display brightness and usage patterns.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Realme 11 Pro Advantages:

  • Higher Resolution Main Camera: Potentially captures more detail in well-lit conditions.

Motorola Edge 40 Neo Advantages:

  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: Smoother and more responsive user experience.
  • Brighter Display: Better outdoor visibility.
  • Lighter and More Compact: Easier to hold and carry.
  • Larger Main Camera Sensor: Potentially better low light performance.
  • Higher Resolution Selfie Camera: Better quality self-portraits.
  • More RAM in the reviewed model: Improved multitasking.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Realme 11 Pro: Users prioritizing a high-resolution main camera for detailed shots in good lighting conditions.

Motorola Edge 40 Neo: Users prioritizing a smooth and responsive display, excellent outdoor visibility, a lightweight design, and potentially better low-light camera performance. Gamers would appreciate the 144Hz display.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is display quality and smoothness? Prioritize the Edge 40 Neo for its 144Hz refresh rate and brighter display.
  2. Do you frequently use your phone in bright sunlight? The Edge 40 Neo's superior brightness is a significant advantage.
  3. Which camera features matter most? Consider the Realme for higher megapixel count if detail in well-lit conditions is paramount. Choose the Edge 40 Neo if low-light performance and selfie quality are more important.

My Choice: Motorola Edge 40 Neo

The Motorola Edge 40 Neo offers a more compelling overall package for my needs. The 144Hz display, brighter screen, lighter weight, and more compact design are significant advantages for daily use. While the Realme 11 Pro boasts a higher resolution main camera, the Edge 40 Neo's larger main sensor size and higher resolution selfie camera likely result in a better overall camera experience, particularly in low light. The extra RAM in the reviewed Edge 40 Neo is also a plus for multitasking. Although subjective, I prefer the overall feel of a lighter and more compact phone.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.